Improving the cost, quality, and safety of perioperative care: A systematic review of the literature on implementation of the perioperative surgical home

被引:15
|
作者
Cline, Kayla M. [1 ]
Clement, Viviane [6 ]
Rock-Klotz, Jennifer [3 ]
Kash, Bita A. [2 ]
Steel, Christopher [4 ]
Miller, Thomas R. [5 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Mays Business Sch, 4113 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, 212 Adriance Lab Rd, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Amer Soc Anesthesiologists, 1061 Amer Lane, Schaumburg, IL USA
[4] Community Business Resources, 1325 Harrison St, Batesville, AR 72501 USA
[5] Amer Soc Anesthesiologists, Analyt & Res Serv, 1061 Amer Lane, Schaumburg, IL 60173 USA
[6] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Anthropol, 340 Spence St, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Surgical procedures operative; Case management; Perioperative care; Health care teams; ENHANCED RECOVERY; POPULATION HEALTH; CLINICAL PATHWAY; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; ARTHROPLASTY; PROTOCOL; MODEL; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109760
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: The perioperative surgical home (PSH) is a recent innovation in perioperative care delivery that coordinates the pre-, intra-, and post-operative elements of surgical care under one organizational umbrella. Although significant research supports the efficacy of individual elements of the PSH in improving outcomes, there is not a published systematic review of the efficacy of entire PSH programs in improving patient outcomes. This article summarizes descriptions of PSH programs available in the literature and examines outcomes of original studies of PSH implementation. Design: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify relevant articles on PSH implementation and synthesize our findings. Setting: The studies included in our review took place at multiple academic and community hospitals in the United States. Patients: Patients involved in the PSH studies included surgical patients of various ages and ASA classifications in various surgical specialties. Interventions: All studies included in our review involved the implementation of a PSH program. Measurements: Outcomes examined include length of stay, postoperative recovery, readmission rates, and patient discharge destination, among others. Main results: We identified 11 studies of PSH implementation that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most PSH programs described in these studies included an emphasis on preoperative education, standardization of care protocols in all phases of surgery, use of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia, and collaborative staffing models. PSH program implementation was often associated with decreased length of stay, decreased utilization of postoperative opioids, decreased utilization of the ICU, and increased probability of discharge to home. PSH implementation was not meaningfully associated with reductions in readmission rates. Findings for cost reductions following PSH implementation were mixed. Conclusions: Early evidence indicates that through elements that emphasize care coordination, standardization, and patient-centeredness, PSH programs can improve patient postoperative recovery outcomes and decrease hospital utilization.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Perioperative Surgical Home: Improving the Value and Quality of Care in Total Joint Replacement
    Chimento G.F.
    Thomas L.C.
    [J]. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2017, 10 (3) : 365 - 369
  • [2] Improving safety and outcomes in perioperative care: does implementation matter?
    Ludbrook, Guy L.
    Peden, Carol J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 128 (05) : 747 - 751
  • [3] How Well Is Quality Improvement Described in the Perioperative Care Literature? A Systematic Review
    Jones, Emma L.
    Lees, Nicholas
    Martin, Graham
    Dixon-Woods, Mary
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2016, 42 (05): : 196 - +
  • [4] Scaling up of safety and quality improvement interventions in perioperative care: a systematic scoping review of implementation strategies and effectiveness
    White, Michelle C.
    Ahuja, Shalini
    Peven, Kimberly
    McLean, Susanna Ritchie
    Hadi, Dina
    Okonkwo, Ijeoma
    Clancy, Olivia
    Turner, Maryann
    Henry, Jaymie Claire Ang
    Sevdalis, Nick
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 7 (10):
  • [5] The perioperative surgical home: An innovative, patient-centred and cost-effective perioperative care model
    Desebbe, Olivier
    Lanz, Thomas
    Kain, Zeev
    Cannesson, Maxime
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [6] Perioperative Systems as a quality model of perioperative medicine and surgical care
    Lee, Anna
    Kerridge, Ross K.
    Chui, Po Tong
    Chiu, Chun Hung
    Gin, Tony
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2011, 102 (2-3) : 214 - 222
  • [7] Perioperative structure and process quality and safety indicators: a systematic review
    Chazapis, M.
    Gilhooly, D.
    Smith, A. F.
    Myles, P. S.
    Haller, G.
    Grocott, M. P. W.
    Moonesinghe, S. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (01) : 51 - 66
  • [8] Is perioperative home the future of surgical patient care?
    Jun Chen
    Hong Liu
    [J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2015, 29 (03) : 173 - 175
  • [9] Is perioperative home the future of surgical patient care?
    Chen, Jun
    Liu, Hong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 29 (03): : 173 - 175
  • [10] A Systematic Literature Review of the Implementation of Cost of Quality
    Makhanya, B. B. S.
    Nel, H.
    Pretorius, J. H. C.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM), 2018, : 726 - 730