NoSQL Document Databases Assessment: Couchbase, CouchDB, and MongoDB

被引:1
|
作者
Carvalho, Ines [1 ]
Sa, Filipe [1 ,3 ]
Bernardino, Jorge [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Coimbra ISEC, Rua Pedro Nunes, P-3030199 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, CISUC Ctr Informat & Syst, P-3030290 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] CISeD Res Ctr Digital Serv Polytech Viseu, Campus Politecn, P-3504510 Viseu, Portugal
关键词
NoSQL Document Databases; OSSpal Methodology; Couchbase; CouchDB; MongoDB;
D O I
10.5220/0011352700003269
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
NoSQL document databases emerged as an alternative to relational databases to deal with large volumes of data. In this paper, we assess the top three free and open-source NoSQL document databases: Couchbase, CouchDB, and MongoDB. Through this analysis, we identify the main characteristics of each database. The OSSpal methodology, which combines quantitative and qualitative measures to assess open-source software was used. This methodology defines seven categories: functionality, operational software characteristics, software technology attributes, documentation, support and service, community and adoption, and development process. At the end, it is obtained a score that identify which is the best NoSQL document database.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 564
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance Evaluation of NoSQL Document Databases: Couchbase, CouchDB, and MongoDB
    Carvalho, Ines
    Sa, Filipe
    Bernardino, Jorge
    [J]. ALGORITHMS, 2023, 16 (02)
  • [2] Evaluation of NoSQL Databases: MongoDB, Cassandra, HBase, Redis, Couchbase, OrientDB
    Matallah, Houcine
    Belalem, Ghalem
    Bouamrane, Karim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE-IJSSCI, 2020, 12 (04): : 71 - 91
  • [3] Evaluation of Couchbase, CouchDB and MongoDB using OSSpal
    Calcada, Andre
    Bernardino, Jorge
    [J]. KDIR: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT - VOL 1: KDIR, 2019, : 427 - 433
  • [4] OSSpal Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison: Couchbase, CouchDB, and MongoDB
    Cardoso, Tiago
    Penela, Joao
    Rosa, Andre
    Wanzeller, Cristina
    Martins, Pedro
    Abbasi, Maryam
    [J]. MARKETING AND SMART TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 1, 2022, 279 : 141 - 150
  • [5] Automatic Mapping of MySQL Databases to NoSQL MongoDB
    Stanescu, Liana
    Brezovan, Marius
    Burdescu, Dumitru Dan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 FEDERATED CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2016, 8 : 837 - 840
  • [6] A survey on RDBMS and NoSQL Databases MySQL vs MongoDB
    Palanisamy, Sowndarya
    SuvithaVani, P.
    [J]. 2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATICS (ICCCI - 2020), 2020, : 55 - +
  • [7] Performance analysis of NoSQL and relational databases with MongoDB and MySQL
    Jose, Benymol
    Abraham, Sajimon
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 24 : 2036 - 2043
  • [8] Comparative Performance Analysis of NoSQL Cassandra and MongoDB Databases
    Araujo, Jose Maria A.
    de Moura, Alysson Cristiano E.
    da Silva, Silvia Laryssa B.
    Holanda, Maristela
    Ribeiro, Edward de Oliveira
    da Silva, Gladston Luiz
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 16TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI'2021), 2021,
  • [9] A Logical Database Design Methodology for MongoDB NoSQL Databases
    Mok, Wai Yin
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM21), 2021, : 1451 - 1455
  • [10] A performance comparison between NoSQL databases: MongoDB and ArangoDB
    Trevino-Villalobos, Marlen
    Viquez-Acuna, Leonardo
    QuirOs-Oviedo, Rocio
    Esquivel-Vega, Gaudy
    [J]. TECNOLOGIA EN MARCHA, 2019, 32 : 5 - 15