Integrated assessment of sustainability trade-offs and pathways for global bioenergy production: Framing a novel hybrid approach

被引:27
|
作者
Acosta-Michlik, Lilibeth [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lucht, Wolfgang [1 ,4 ]
Bondeau, Alberte [1 ]
Beringer, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Philippines, Sch Environm Sci & Management SESAM, Los Banos 4031, Laguna, Philippines
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Study Environm Change & Sustainabil CECS, Sch Geosci, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Humboldt Univ, Dept Geog, Berlin, Germany
来源
关键词
Bioenergy; Sustainable development; Integrated assessment; Sustainability trade-offs; Sustainability pathways; Land-use change; BIO-ENERGY; OIL PALM; BIOFUELS PRODUCTION; PUBLIC PREFERENCES; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; WATER FOOTPRINT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FOOD SECURITY; SOIL-EROSION; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Current controversies and debates on bioenergy production in the areas of greenhouse gases emission reduction, food and energy security, social exclusion and welfare erosion, and ecosystem deterioration attest to the challenges which the bioenergy sector has to overcome to achieve its global production potentials. Because it is yet an evolving sector, the sustainability of bioenergy production in different regions is very elusive. Experiences show that bioenergy policies in one region can have impacts not only on its own but also on other regions' social, economic and ecological sustainability. It is thus important to assess development pathways for bioenergy to exploit the potential benefits and forestall any unnecessary costs. This paper frames a novel hybrid approach for assessing bioenergy potentials for regions with diverging economic, social and ecological systems. The approach is based on a conceptual framework that takes into account trade-offs decisions on sustainability goals and production options in the assessment of bioenergy pathways. It combines different empirical techniques for the systematic investigation of trade-offs and pathways including fuzzy logic, conjoint, logit, and path analyses. To show the relevance and utility of these techniques for the integrated assessment of trade-offs and pathways in bioenergy development, we illustrated their application using results and data from previous related studies. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2791 / 2809
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Navigating sustainability trade-offs in global beef production
    Castonguay, Adam C.
    Polasky, Stephen
    H. Holden, Matthew
    Herrero, Mario
    Mason-D'Croz, Daniel
    Godde, Cecile
    Chang, Jinfeng
    Gerber, James
    Witt, G. Bradd
    Game, Edward T.
    A. Bryan, Brett
    Wintle, Brendan
    Lee, Katie
    Bal, Payal
    McDonald-Madden, Eve
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 6 (03) : 284 - +
  • [2] Navigating sustainability trade-offs in global beef production
    Adam C. Castonguay
    Stephen Polasky
    Matthew H. Holden
    Mario Herrero
    Daniel Mason-D’Croz
    Cecile Godde
    Jinfeng Chang
    James Gerber
    G. Bradd Witt
    Edward T. Game
    Brett A. Bryan
    Brendan Wintle
    Katie Lee
    Payal Bal
    Eve McDonald-Madden
    [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2023, 6 : 284 - 294
  • [3] Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs?
    Humpenoeder, Florian
    Popp, Alexander
    Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon
    Weindl, Isabelle
    Biewald, Anne
    Lotze-Campen, Hermann
    Dietrich, Jan Philipp
    Klein, David
    Kreidenweis, Ulrich
    Mueller, Christoph
    Rolinski, Susanne
    Stevanovic, Miodrag
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [4] Scenarios of global bioenergy production: The trade-offs between agricultural expansion, intensification and trade
    Lotze-Campen, Hermann
    Popp, Alexander
    Beringer, Tim
    Mueller, Christoph
    Bondeau, Alberte
    Rost, Stefanie
    Lucht, Wolfgang
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2010, 221 (18) : 2188 - 2196
  • [5] Conceptualising and managing trade-offs in sustainability assessment
    Morrison-Saunders, Angus
    Pope, Jenny
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 : 54 - 63
  • [6] Avoiding sustainability trade-offs in environmental assessment
    Gibson, Robert B.
    [J]. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2013, 31 (01) : 2 - 12
  • [7] Sustainability trade-offs in bioenergy development in the Philippines: An application of conjoint analysis
    Acosta, Lilibeth A.
    Eugenio, Elena A.
    Enano, Nelson H., Jr.
    Magcale-Macandog, Damasa B.
    Vega, Belita A.
    Macandog, Paula Beatrice M.
    Eugenio, Jemimah Mae A.
    Lopez, Marilou A.
    Salvacion, Arnold R.
    Lucht, Wolfgang
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 64 : 20 - 41
  • [8] Synergies and Trade-Offs for Sustainable Food Production in Sweden: An Integrated Approach
    Talle, Malin
    Wirehn, Lotten
    Ellstrom, Daniel
    Hjerpe, Mattias
    Huge-Brodin, Maria
    Jensen, Per
    Lindstrom, Tom
    Neset, Tina-Simone
    Wennergren, Uno
    Metson, Genevieve
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (03)
  • [9] Navigating sustainability and health trade-offs in global seafood systems
    Robinson, James P. W.
    Garrett, Angus
    Esclapez, Juan Carlos Paredes
    Maire, Eva
    Parker, Robert W. R.
    Graham, Nicholas A. J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (12)
  • [10] The triple-bottom-line: Framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice
    Coffman M.
    Umemoto K.
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2010, 12 (5) : 597 - 610