Timing of Thoracic Outlet Decompression after Thrombolysis for Primary Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Systematic Review

被引:16
|
作者
de Kleijn, Robert J. C. M. F. [1 ]
Schropp, Ludo [1 ]
Westerink, Jan [1 ]
de Borst, Gert J. [1 ]
Petri, Bart-Jeroen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
PAGET-SCHROETTER-SYNDROME; SUBCLAVIAN VEIN-THROMBOSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.083
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The optimal timing of decompression surgery after thrombolysis in patients with primary upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) is still a matter of debate. This system- atic review compares the safety and efficacy of early intervention versus postponed intervention in patients with primary UEDVT. Methods: A structured PUBMED, EMBASE, and COCHRANE search was performed for studies reporting on the timing of surgical intervention for primary UEDVT. Studies reporting on timing of decompression surgery in combination with recurrent thrombosis, bleeding complications, and symptom-free survival were included. Two treatment groups were defined; group A received surgical decompression within two weeks after thrombolysis and group B after two weeks or more. All end points were assessed in accordance with the reported outcomes in the included articles. Mean percentages were calculated using descriptive statistics. Results: Six articles (126 patients) were included: 87 patients in group A versus 39 in group B. In group A, bleeding complications occurred in 7% of patients versus 5% in group B. Two-third of the bleeding complications in group A occurred in patients receiving surgical decompression within 24 hr after thrombolysis while kept on intravenous heparin both preoperatively and post- operatively. Reported preoperative recurrent thrombosis was 7% in group A versus 11% in group B, another 13% had postoperative recurrent thrombosis versus 21% in group B. The effectiveness of both treatment strategies was comparable with a total of 89% of patients in group A with minimal or no symptoms at final follow-up compared with 90% in group B. The mean follow-up in group A was 35 months (1-168 months) and 28 months (1-168 months) in group B. Conclusions: Based on the limited available data presented in this review, early decompres- sion surgery within two weeks after catheter-directed thrombolysis seems as safe and effective as postponed surgical intervention in patients with primary UEDVT.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 661
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Same Admission Hybrid Treatment of Primary Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis with Thrombolysis, Transaxillary Thoracic Outlet Decompression, and Immediate Endovascular Evaluation
    Pesser, Niels
    Bode, Aron
    Goeteyn, Jens
    Hendriks, Joris
    van Nuenen, Bart F. L.
    van Sambeek, Marc R. H. M.
    Teijink, Joep A. W.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 71 : 249 - 256
  • [2] Outcome after thrombolysis and selective thoracic outlet decompression for primary axillary vein thrombosis
    Lokanathan, R
    Salvian, AJ
    Chen, JC
    Morris, C
    Taylor, DC
    Hsiang, YN
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (04) : 783 - 788
  • [3] Thoracic outlet syndrome (TROTS) registry: A study protocol for the primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis section
    Schropp, Ludo
    de Kleijn, Robert J. C. M. F.
    Westerink, Jan C.
    Nijkeuter, Mathilde
    Vonken, Evert-Jan
    van der Schaaf, Irene S.
    Goedee, H. Stephan
    Vrancken, Alexander F. J. E. J.
    van Hattum, Eline
    Petri, Bart-Jeroen
    de Borst, Gert
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [4] Optimal management of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: Is venous thoracic outlet syndrome underrecognized?
    Illig, Karl A.
    Gober, Leah
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2022, 10 (02) : 514 - 526
  • [5] PRIMARY DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS OF UPPER EXTREMITY
    ADAMS, JT
    MCEVOY, RK
    DEWEESE, JA
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1965, 91 (01) : 29 - &
  • [6] Thrombolysis and Surgical Decompression for Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
    Yin, Victoria
    V. Udelsman, Brooks
    Kim, Alexander T.
    Wightman, Sean C.
    Harano, Takashi
    Rosenberg, Graeme M.
    Atay, Scott M.
    Kim, Anthony W.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 303 : 134 - 140
  • [7] Is catheter directed thrombolysis without thoracic outlet decompression an acceptable management of upper limb deep vein thrombosis?
    Kiernan, D. A.
    Brophy, D.
    Cantwell, C.
    McCann, J.
    Mehigan, D.
    Sheehan, S.
    Dowdall, J.
    Barry, M. C.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 186 : S81 - S81
  • [8] Pharmacomechanical or ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty and provisional surgical decompression for upper extremity deep vein thrombosis due to thoracic outlet syndrome
    Stuck, Anna Katharina
    Engelberger, Rolf Peter
    Saengprakai, Wuttichai
    Kucher, Nils
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2016, 145 : 109 - 111
  • [9] Primary upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis
    Viera, AJ
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 1997, 162 (12) : 829 - 831
  • [10] PRIMARY AND SECONDARY DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS OF THE UPPER EXTREMITY
    THEISS, W
    ZAUS, M
    HEINZ, M
    KIEFHABER, M
    PINSKER, M
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1995, 73 (06) : 1107 - 1107