Radiological and hormonal responses of functioning pituitary adenomas after gamma knife radiosurgery

被引:39
|
作者
Choi, JY
Chang, JH
Chang, JW
Ha, Y
Park, YG
Chung, SS
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Neurosurg, Brain Res Inst, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Brain Korea Project Med Sci 21, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
gamma knife radiosurgery; functioning pituitary adenoma; tumor growth control; hormonal normalization;
D O I
10.3349/ymj.2003.44.4.602
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In this study, we examined patients with functioning pituitary adenoma that underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS). In particular, we assessed the effects of GKS on the growth and endocrinological response of the functioning pituitary adenoma. Forty-two cases of functioning pituitary adenoma treated with GKS were analyzed. The mean follow-up duration was 42.5 months (range 6-98), and the mean tumor volume was 1.4 cm(3) (range 0.1-3.8). Multiple isocenters, ranging from 1 to 6 in number (mean 2.7), were used. The tumor margin was covered by an isodose ranging from 50 to 90%. The margin dose was 18 to 40 Gy (mean 28.5) and the maximum dose varied from 35 to 80 Gy (mean 54.1). Tumor growth was controlled in 96.9% of the cases and tumor shrinkage occurred in 40.6% of the cases. Hormonal response was observed in 35 of the 42 (83.3%) patients after GKS, with a mean duration of 6.8 months. Sixteen of the 42 (38.1%) patients showed hormonal normalization, with a mean duration of 21 months. In our multivariate analysis, high integral dosage (p=0.005) and maximum dosage (p=0.001) correlated significantly with hormonal normalization. For patients with functioning pituitary adenoma, GKS can be effective in controlling tumor growth and inducing hormonal normalization, especially if patients are reluctant to undergo surgical resection, or are not able to undergo microsurgery under general anesthesia. It appears that early hormonal normalization can be induced by high maximum dosage (at least 50 Gy) and broad coverage of the target volume within the isodose curve, while keeping the maximum dose to the visual pathways below 9 Gy.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 607
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gamma Knife radiosurgery for functioning pituitary adenomas
    Kim, SH
    Huh, R
    Chang, JW
    Park, YG
    Chung, SS
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 72 : 101 - 110
  • [2] Hormonal and radiologic outcomes after gamma knife radiosurgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas
    Kara, Mujdat
    Yilmaz, Meltem
    Sengoz, Meric
    Peker, Selcuk
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 38 (02) : 486 - 492
  • [3] Gamma Knife radiosurgery and non-functioning pituitary adenomas
    Kovacs, Kalman
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 120 (03) : 645 - 645
  • [4] Gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas
    Izawa, M
    Hayashi, M
    Nakaya, K
    Satoh, H
    Ochiai, T
    Hori, T
    Takakura, K
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 93 : 19 - 22
  • [5] Gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas
    Jezkova, Jana
    Marek, Josef
    MINERVA ENDOCRINOLOGICA, 2016, 41 (03) : 366 - 376
  • [6] Gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas
    Atsuya Akabane
    Shozo Yamada
    Hidefumi Jokura
    Endocrine, 2005, 28 (1) : 87 - 91
  • [7] Gamma Knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas
    Hayashi, M
    Izawa, M
    Hiyama, H
    Nakamura, S
    Atsuchi, S
    Sato, H
    Nakaya, K
    Sasaki, K
    Ochiai, T
    Kubo, O
    Hori, T
    Takakura, K
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 72 : 111 - 118
  • [8] Pituitary adenomas:: is Gamma Knife® radiosurgery safe?
    Sheehan, J
    Steiner, L
    Laws, ER
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2005, 1 (01): : 2 - 3
  • [9] Pituitary adenomas: is Gamma Knife® radiosurgery safe?
    Jason Sheehan
    Ladislau Steiner
    Edward R Laws
    Nature Clinical Practice Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2005, 1 : 2 - 3
  • [10] MR imaging of pituitary adenomas after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery
    Tung, GA
    Noren, G
    Rogg, JM
    Jackson, IMD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (04) : 919 - 924