Clinical impact of 3-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex: a retrospective study of patients who received a zero-profile anchored spacer versus cage-plate construct

被引:13
|
作者
Xiao, Bowei [1 ]
Wu, Bingxuan [1 ]
Rong, Tianhua [1 ]
Cui, Wei [1 ]
Sang, Dacheng [1 ]
Liu, Baoge [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 119 South 4th Ring West RD, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cervical spondylosis; Spinal fusion device; Cervical atlas; Axis; Anterior cervical decompression and fusion; MOTION; SPINE; ALIGNMENT; RANGE; FLEXION; EXTENSION; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-021-06974-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To evaluate changes in the sagittal parameters of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex after three-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and identify the influential factors by comparing ACDF with a zero-profile anchored spacer (ACDF-Z) versus a cage-plate construct (ACDF-P). Methods The cohort comprised 106 patients who underwent three-level contiguous ACDF-Z or ACDF-P for cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Standing, flexion, and extension radiographs of cervical spine were obtained preoperatively, and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The assessed cervical sagittal parameters were the platform angle of the axis, Cobb angle, and range of motion (ROM) of C2-7, C0-, and C1-2. Results In both the ACDF-Z and ACDF-P groups, the Cobb angle of the upper cervical spine decreased and the C0-1 ROM increased from preoperatively to 3 and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.01). The alignment restoration was lost at 12 months compared with 3 months in the ACDF-Z group, but not in the ACDF-P group (P < 0.01). The ACDF-P group showed more loss of C2-7 ROM and more compensatory changes in C0-2 ROM than the ACDF-Z group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The Cobb angle decreased and ROM increased significantly as compensatory changes of the atlantooccipital or atlantoaxial joint after both types of ACDF, which may accelerate degeneration. The zero-profile anchored spacer had less impact on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex but was worse at maintaining the alignment restoration, which were contrary to the cage-plate construct. Surgeons should be aware of the impact of multi-level ACDFs on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex.
引用
收藏
页码:3656 / 3665
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Clinical impact of 3-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex: a retrospective study of patients who received a zero-profile anchored spacer versus cage-plate construct
    Bowei Xiao
    Bingxuan Wu
    Tianhua Rong
    Wei Cui
    Dacheng Sang
    Baoge Liu
    European Spine Journal, 2021, 30 : 3656 - 3665
  • [2] Adjacent-level biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion with anchored zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct: a finite element study
    Li, Xin-Feng
    Jin, Lin-Yu
    Liang, Chao-Ge
    Yin, Hong-Ling
    Song, Xiao-Xing
    BMC SURGERY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [3] Adjacent-level biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion with anchored zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct: a finite element study
    Xin-Feng Li
    Lin-Yu Jin
    Chao-Ge Liang
    Hong-Ling Yin
    Xiao-Xing Song
    BMC Surgery, 20
  • [4] Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Zhang, Jun
    Wang, Shanxi
    Tang, Xiangyu
    Xiong, Wei
    Wu, Hua
    Liu, Chaoxu
    Li, Feng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [5] Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Jun Zhang
    Shanxi Wang
    Xiangyu Tang
    Wei Xiong
    Hua Wu
    Chaoxu Liu
    Feng Li
    European Journal of Medical Research, 27
  • [6] Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer Versus Plate and Cage for 3-Level Contiguous Cervical Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Li
    Liu, Dan
    Wang, Mingjiao
    Huang, Yong
    Chen, Zhen
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 190 : 228 - 239
  • [7] Zero-Profile Spacer Versus Cage-Plate Construct in Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tong, Min-Ji
    Xiang, Guang-Heng
    He, Zi-Li
    Chen, De-Heng
    Tang, Qian
    Xu, Hua-Zi
    Tian, Nai-Feng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 104 : 545 - 553
  • [8] Incidence of dysphagia of zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion A meta-analysis
    Yang, Zhongmeng
    Zhao, Yao
    Luo, Jiaquan
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (25)
  • [9] Zero-profile anchored spacer versus conventional plate-cage construct in bilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yu
    Ju, Jidong
    Wu, Jinchun
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [10] Zero-profile anchored spacer versus conventional plate-cage construct in bilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu Zhang
    Jidong Ju
    Jinchun Wu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18