A penalized blind likelihood Kriging method for surrogate modeling

被引:18
|
作者
Zhang, Yi [1 ]
Yao, Wen [2 ]
Chen, Xiaoqian [2 ]
Ye, Siyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Aerosp Sci & Engn, Changsha 410073, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Mil Sci, Natl Innovat Inst Def Technol, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Kriging; Trend function; Stochastic process; Penalized blind likelihood; TREND FUNCTION; DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM; REGRESSION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-019-02368-7
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Surrogate modeling is commonly used to replace expensive simulations of engineering problems. Kriging is a popular surrogate for deterministic approximation due to its good nonlinear fitting ability. Previous researches demonstrate that constructing an appropriate trend function or a better stochastic process can improve the prediction accuracy of Kriging. However, they are not improved simultaneously to estimate the model parameters, thus limiting the further improvement on the prediction capability. In this paper, a novel penalized blind likelihood Kriging (PBLK) method is proposed to obtain better model parameters and improve the prediction accuracy. It improves the trend function and stochastic process with regularization techniques simultaneously. First, the formulation of the penalized blind likelihood function is introduced, which penalizes the regression coefficients and correlation parameters at the same time. It is a general expression and therefore can incorporate any type of penalty functions easily. To maximize the penalized blind likelihood function effectively and efficiently, a nested optimization algorithm is proposed to estimate the model parameters sequentially with gradient and Hessian information. As different regularization parameters can lead to different optimal model parameters and influence the prediction accuracy, a cross-validation-based grid search method is proposed to select good regularization parameters. The proposed PBLK method is tested on several analytical functions and two engineering examples, and the experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 474
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A penalized blind likelihood Kriging method for surrogate modeling
    Yi Zhang
    Wen Yao
    Xiaoqian Chen
    Siyu Ye
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2020, 61 : 457 - 474
  • [2] Step-by-Step Penalized Blind Kriging Methods for Surrogate Modeling
    Feng, Ziheng
    Li, Min
    Wang, Xiao
    Zhao, Jianxin
    Li, Xinmin
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [3] A Penalized Likelihood Method for Structural Equation Modeling
    Huang, Po-Hsien
    Chen, Hung
    Weng, Li-Jen
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2017, 82 (02) : 329 - 354
  • [4] A Penalized Likelihood Method for Structural Equation Modeling
    Po-Hsien Huang
    Hung Chen
    Li-Jen Weng
    Psychometrika, 2017, 82 : 329 - 354
  • [5] PENALIZED BLIND KRIGING IN COMPUTER EXPERIMENTS
    Hung, Ying
    STATISTICA SINICA, 2011, 21 (03) : 1171 - 1190
  • [6] An EM Approach to Blind Kriging with Adaptive Mean for Surrogate Modeling
    Deng, Hai-Song
    Gong, Fang
    Shen, Ju-Hua
    2015 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY (FSKD), 2015, : 455 - 459
  • [7] Frailty Modeling and Penalized Likelihood Methodology
    Vonta, Filia
    Koukouvinos, Christos
    Androulakis, Emmanouil
    2016 SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STOCHASTIC MODELS IN RELIABILITY ENGINEERING, LIFE SCIENCE AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT (SMRLO), 2016, : 451 - 455
  • [8] Analysis of computer experiments using penalized likelihood in Gaussian kriging models
    Li, RZ
    Sudjianto, A
    TECHNOMETRICS, 2005, 47 (02) : 111 - 120
  • [9] Kriging surrogate model with coordinate transformation based on likelihood and gradient
    Namura, Nobuo
    Shimoyama, Koji
    Obayashi, Shigeru
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 68 (04) : 827 - 849
  • [10] Kriging surrogate model with coordinate transformation based on likelihood and gradient
    Nobuo Namura
    Koji Shimoyama
    Shigeru Obayashi
    Journal of Global Optimization, 2017, 68 : 827 - 849