Dichorionic triplet pregnancies: risk of miscarriage and severe preterm delivery with fetal reduction versus expectant management. Outcomes of a cohort study and systematic review

被引:45
|
作者
Morlando, M. [1 ]
Ferrara, L. [2 ]
D'Antonio, F. [1 ]
Lawin-O'Brien, A. [2 ]
Sankaran, S. [3 ]
Pasupathy, D. [3 ,4 ]
Khalil, A. [1 ]
Papageorghiou, A. [1 ]
Kyle, P. [3 ]
Lees, C. [2 ]
Thilaganathan, B. [1 ]
Bhide, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ London, Fetal Maternal Med Unit, Acad Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London SW17 0RE, England
[2] Queen Charlottes & Chelsea Hosp, London W6 0XG, England
[3] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Fetal Med Unit, London, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Div Womens Hlth, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
Dichorionic triplets; embryo reduction; fetal reduction; mixed chorionicity; selective termination; triplet pregnancy; MULTIPLE PREGNANCIES; EMBRYO REDUCTION; BIRTH; CHORIONICITY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.13348
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background In trichorionic pregnancies, fetal reduction from three to two lowers the risk of severe preterm delivery, but provides no advantage in survival. Similar data for dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplets is not readily available. Objectives To document the natural history of DCTA triplets and the effect of reduction on the risk of miscarriage and severe preterm delivery, compared with expectant management. Search strategy Systematic search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Selection criteria DCTA triplets with three live fetuses at 814 weeks of gestation, outcome data with expectant management and/or reduction, miscarriage before 24 weeks of gestation and/or severe preterm delivery before 32-33 weeks of gestation. Data collection and analysis Five studies were included. Data from these were combined with data from three centres. Main results There were 331 DCTA triplets. The miscarriage rate was 8.9% (95% CI 5.8-13.3%) and the severe preterm delivery rate was 33.3% (95% CI 27.5-39.7%), with expectant management. The miscarriage rate was 14.5% (95% CI 7.626.2%) with a reduction of the monochorionic pair, 8.8% (95% CI 3.0-23.0%) with a reduction of one fetus of the monochorionic pair, and 23.5% (9.6-47.3%) with a reduction of the fetus with a separate placenta. Severe preterm delivery rates were 5.5% (95% CI 1.9-14-9%), 11.8% (95% CI 4.7-26.6%), and 17.6% (95% CI 6.2-41.0%), respectively. Conclusions In DCTA triplets, expectant management is a reasonable choice when the top priority is a liveborn infant. Where the priority is to minimise severe preterm delivery, the most advisable option is fetal reduction. Further studies are needed to clarify which particular technique is advisable to optimise the outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1060
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Risks of miscarriage or preterm delivery in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Anthoulakis, C.
    Dagklis, T.
    Mamopoulos, A.
    Athanasiadis, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (06) : 1351 - 1359
  • [2] Risks of miscarriage and preterm birth in dichorionic and trichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: A meta-analysis
    Anthoulakis, C.
    Dagklis, T.
    Mamopoulos, A.
    Petousis, S.
    Margioula-Siarkou, C.
    Athanasiadis, A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 : 124 - 124
  • [3] Risks of miscarriage and early preterm birth in trichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: new data and systematic review
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    Avgidou, K.
    Bakoulas, V.
    Sebire, N. J.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 (07) : 1912 - 1917
  • [4] Outcomes of fetal reduction versus expectant management in dichorionic triamniotic triplets
    Meng, Xinlu
    Huang, Jiaqi
    Yuan, Pengbo
    Wang, Xueju
    Shi, Xiaoming
    Zhao, Yangyu
    Wei, Yuan
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 43 (11) : 1442 - 1449
  • [5] Outcome of monochorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies: Expectant management versus fetal reduction
    Meng, Xinlu
    Wang, Ying
    Yuan, Pengbo
    Wang, Xueju
    Yin, Shaohua
    Shi, Huifeng
    Gong, Xiaoli
    Zhao, Yangyu
    Wei, Yuan
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2022, 42 (08) : 970 - 977
  • [6] Selective Fetal Reduction Versus Expectant Management in Triplet Pregnancies After IVF-ET
    Satti, Mohamed
    Abhari, Sina
    Abuzeid, Omar
    Rocha, Frederico G.
    Vettraino, Ivana
    Abuzeid, Mostafa
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 : 64S - 64S
  • [7] Pregnancy outcomes of dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: multifoetal pregnancy reduction versus expectant management
    Pei Cai
    Yan Ouyang
    Fei Gong
    Xihong Li
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20
  • [8] Pregnancy outcomes of dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: multifoetal pregnancy reduction versus expectant management
    Cai, Pei
    Ouyang, Yan
    Gong, Fei
    Li, Xihong
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [9] Perinatal outcomes in dichorionic diamniotic twins with multifetal pregnancy reduction versus expectant management A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jin, Bihui
    Huang, Qiongxiao
    Ji, Mengxia
    Yu, Zhizhi
    Shu, Jing
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (25) : E20730
  • [10] Neonatal outcomes in trial of vaginal birth versus repeat caesarean delivery in preterm pregnancies: A prospective cohort study
    Suresh, Sunitha C.
    Dude, Annie
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 (08) : 1319 - 1324