Seismic design of steel moment-resisting frame structures using multi objective optimization

被引:7
|
作者
Liu, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1193/1.1902952
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Design of seismic-resistant civil structural systems necessitates a balanced minimization of two general conflicting objective functions: the short-term construction investment and the long-term seismic risk. Many of the existing seismic design optimization procedures use single objectives of either the traditional minimum material usage (weight or cost) or the recent minimum expected life-cycle cost, while imposing constraints from relevant code specifications as well as additional seismic performance requirements. The resulting single optimized structural design may not always perform satisfactorily in terms of other important but competing merit objectives; the designer's individual risk-taking preference is not explicitly integrated into the design process. This paper presents a practical and general framework for design optimization of code-compliant seismic-resistant structures. Multiple objective functions, which reflect material usage, initial construction expenses, degree of design complexity, seismic structural performance, and lifetime seismic damage cost, respectively, are treated simultaneously as well as separately in the optimization process. Member-sizing problems of unbraced, regular planar, steel moment-resisting frames are selected as application examples. The resulting wide spread of optimized trade-off design alternatives enables structural engineers to actively select a cost-effective design solution that compromises conflicting merit objectives in a preferred manner.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 414
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of controlled steel moment-resisting frame structures
    Barroso, LR
    Winterstein, S
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2002, 31 (12): : 2049 - 2066
  • [2] Evaluation of the Seismic Behaviour of Modular Steel Moment-Resisting Frame Structures with Knee Braces
    Mokhtari, Mahdi
    Imanpour, Ali
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, STESSA 2022, 2022, 262 : 499 - 507
  • [3] Simplified assessment of the seismic collapse capacity of flexible moment-resisting steel frame structures
    Adam, C.
    Jaeger, C.
    STESSA 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, 2012, : 463 - 469
  • [4] Effect of higher modes on the seismic response and design of moment-resisting RC frame structures
    Maniatakis, Charilaos A.
    Psycharis, Ioannis N.
    Spyrakos, Constantine C.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2013, 56 : 417 - 430
  • [5] Single and multi-objective optimization of steel moment-resisting frame buildings under vehicle impact using evolutionary algorithms
    Sadeghi A.
    Kazemi H.
    Samadi M.
    Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, 2021, 6 (1)
  • [6] Fundamental period of irregular moment-resisting steel frame structures
    Young, Kelly
    Adeli, Hojjat
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2014, 23 (15): : 1141 - 1157
  • [7] Performance Assessment of Steel Moment-Resisting Frame Structures Using Fragility Methodology
    Mosallam, Ayman
    Zirakian, Tadeh
    Abdelaal, Ayman
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 144 (03)
  • [8] Health monitoring of a steel moment-resisting frame subjected to seismic loads
    Mosallam, Ayman
    Zirakian, Tadeh
    Abdelaal, Ayman
    Bayraktar, Alemdar
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2018, 140 : 34 - 46
  • [9] REMARKS ON THE APPROACHES FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF MOMENT-RESISTING STEEL FRAMES
    Bernuzzi, Claudio
    Chesi, Claudio
    Rodigari, Davide
    De Col, Riccardo
    INGEGNERIA SISMICA, 2018, 35 (02): : 37 - 47
  • [10] Seismic performance and design of bolted steel moment-resisting frames
    Astaneh-Asl, A
    ENGINEERING JOURNAL-AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION INC, 1999, 36 (03): : 105 - 120