Biophysical impacts of climate-smart agriculture in the Midwest United States

被引:42
|
作者
Bagley, Justin E. [1 ]
Miller, Jesse [1 ,2 ]
Bernacchi, Carl J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, EBI, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Plant Biol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] ARS, Global Change & Photosynth Res Unit, USDA, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
来源
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT | 2015年 / 38卷 / 09期
关键词
CO2; heat; transpiration; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; TRANSFER SCHEME LSX; LAND-COVER CHANGE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; BIOENERGY CROPS; ENERGY-BALANCE; MODEL GENESIS; SURFACE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; RESIDUE;
D O I
10.1111/pce.12485
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The potential impacts of climate change in the Midwest United States present unprecedented challenges to regional agriculture. In response to these challenges, a variety of climate-smart agricultural methodologies have been proposed to retain or improve crop yields, reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, retain soil quality and increase climate resilience of agricultural systems. One component that is commonly neglected when assessing the environmental impacts of climate-smart agriculture is the biophysical impacts, where changes in ecosystem fluxes and storage of moisture and energy lead to perturbations in local climate and water availability. Using a combination of observational data and an agroecosystem model, a series of climate-smart agricultural scenarios were assessed to determine the biophysical impacts these techniques have in the Midwest United States. The first scenario extended the growing season for existing crops using future temperature and CO2 concentrations. The second scenario examined the biophysical impacts of no-till agriculture and the impacts of annually retaining crop debris. Finally, the third scenario evaluated the potential impacts that the adoption of perennial cultivars had on biophysical quantities. Each of these scenarios was found to have significant biophysical impacts. However, the timing and magnitude of the biophysical impacts differed between scenarios. This study assessed the biophysical impacts of several climate-smart agricultural practices in the Midwest United States. Specifically we investigated the biophysical impacts of adapting crops to extended growing season length, expanding no-till agriculture, and the adoption of perennial cultivars. We found that each of these practices had significant biophysical impacts, but the seasonality and extent of the impacts differed between scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:1913 / 1930
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] From climate-smart agriculture to climate-smart landscapes
    Scherr S.J.
    Shames S.
    Friedman R.
    [J]. Agriculture & Food Security, 1 (1):
  • [2] What climate-smart agriculture means to members of the Global Alliance for climate-smart agriculture
    Alexander, Shinnola
    [J]. FUTURE OF FOOD-JOURNAL ON FOOD AGRICULTURE AND SOCIETY, 2019, 7 (01): : 21 - 30
  • [3] Climate-smart agriculture: adoption, impacts, and implications for sustainable development
    Ma, Wanglin
    Rahut, Dil Bahadur
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2024, 29 (05)
  • [4] Climate-smart agriculture: Greenhouse gas mitigation in climate-smart villages of Ghana
    Anuga, Samuel Weniga
    Fosu-Mensah, Benedicta Yayra
    Nukpezah, Daniel
    Ahenkan, Albert
    Gordon, Christopher
    Baye, Richmond Silvanus
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 5 (04) : 457 - 469
  • [5] Community-Level Impacts of Climate-Smart Agriculture Interventions on Food Security and Dietary Diversity in Climate-Smart Villages in Myanmar
    Hanley, Andrew
    Brychkova, Galina
    Barbon, Wilson John
    Noe, Su Myat
    Myae, Chan
    Thant, Phyu Sin
    McKeown, Peter C.
    Gonsalves, Julian
    Spillane, Charles
    [J]. CLIMATE, 2021, 9 (11)
  • [6] Climate-smart agriculture: making agriculture climate-friendly
    Torquebiau, Emmanuel
    [J]. CAHIERS AGRICULTURES, 2017, 26 (06):
  • [7] Harmonizing climate-smart and sustainable agriculture
    Peng, Bin
    Guan, Kaiyu
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2021, 2 (11): : 853 - 854
  • [8] Climate-smart agriculture: what is it good for?
    Taylor, Marcus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2018, 45 (01): : 89 - 107
  • [9] Climate-smart agriculture for food security
    Leslie Lipper
    Philip Thornton
    Bruce M. Campbell
    Tobias Baedeker
    Ademola Braimoh
    Martin Bwalya
    Patrick Caron
    Andrea Cattaneo
    Dennis Garrity
    Kevin Henry
    Ryan Hottle
    Louise Jackson
    Andrew Jarvis
    Fred Kossam
    Wendy Mann
    Nancy McCarthy
    Alexandre Meybeck
    Henry Neufeldt
    Tom Remington
    Pham Thi Sen
    Reuben Sessa
    Reynolds Shula
    Austin Tibu
    Emmanuel F. Torquebiau
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4 : 1068 - 1072
  • [10] IoT based climate-smart agriculture
    Goar, Vishal Kumar
    Tanwar, Pawan
    Kuri, Manoj
    [J]. Test Engineering and Management, 2019, 81 (11-12): : 6620 - 6624