Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review

被引:226
|
作者
Nilsson, C. [1 ,2 ]
Hessman, E. [3 ]
Sjoblom, H. [3 ]
Dencker, A. [2 ]
Jangsten, E. [2 ]
Mollberg, M. [2 ]
Patel, H. [2 ]
Sparud-Lundin, C. [2 ]
Wigert, H. [2 ]
Begley, C. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Boras, Fac Caring Sci Work Life & Social Welf, S-50190 Boras, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Hlth & Care Sci, Box 457, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Gothenburg Univ Lib, Biomed Lib, Box 416, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Chair Nursing & Midwifery, 24 DOlier St, Dublin 2, Ireland
来源
关键词
Fear of childbirth; Systematic review; Prevalence; W-DEQ; FOBS; Request for caesarean section; EMERGENCY CESAREAN-SECTION; NATIONAL BIRTH COHORT; 6 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; PREGNANT-WOMEN; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; SWEDISH WOMEN; SELF-EFFICACY; OBSTETRIC INTERVENTIONS; ANTENATAL EDUCATION; MATERNAL REQUEST;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Fear of Childbirth (FOC) is a common problem affecting women's health and wellbeing, and a common reason for requesting caesarean section. The aims of this review were to summarise published research on prevalence of FOC in childbearing women and how it is defined and measured during pregnancy and postpartum, and to search for useful measures of FOC, for research as well as for clinical settings. Methods: Five bibliographic databases in March 2015 were searched for published research on FOC, using a protocol agreed a priori. The quality of selected studies was assessed independently by pairs of authors. Prevalence data, definitions and methods of measurement were extracted independently from each included study by pairs of authors. Finally, some of the country rates were combined and compared. Results: In total, 12,188 citations were identified and screened by title and abstract; 11,698 were excluded and full-text of 490 assessed for analysis. Of these, 466 were excluded leaving 24 papers included in the review, presenting prevalence of FOC from nine countries in Europe, Australia, Canada and the United States. Various definitions and measurements of FOC were used. The most frequently-used scale was the W-DEQ with various cut-off points describing moderate, severe/intense and extreme/phobic fear. Different 3-, 4-, and 5/6 point scales and visual analogue scales were also used. Country rates (as measured by seven studies using W-DEQ with >= 85 cut-off point) varied from 6.3 to 14.8%, a significant difference (chi-square = 104.44, d.f. = 6, rho < 0.0001). Conclusions: Rates of severe FOC, measured in the same way, varied in different countries. Reasons why FOC might differ are unknown, and further research is necessary. Future studies on FOC should use the W-DEQ tool with a cut-off point of >= 85, or a more thoroughly tested version of the FOBS scale, or a three-point scale measurement of FOC using a single question as 'Are you afraid about the birth?' In this way, valid comparisons in research can be made. Moreover, validation of a clinical tool that is more focussed on FOC alone, and easier than the longer W-DEQ, for women to fill in and clinicians to administer, is required.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review
    C. Nilsson
    E. Hessman
    H. Sjöblom
    A. Dencker
    E. Jangsten
    M. Mollberg
    H. Patel
    C. Sparud-Lundin
    H. Wigert
    C. Begley
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18
  • [2] Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth: A systematic review
    Dencker, Anna
    Nilsson, Christina
    Begley, Cecily
    Jangsten, Elisabeth
    Mollberg, Margareta
    Patel, Harshida
    Wigert, Helena
    Hessman, Eva
    Sjoblom, Helen
    Sparud-Lundin, Carina
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2019, 32 (02) : 99 - 111
  • [3] The psychometric properties of fear of childbirth instruments: a systematic review
    Hoseini, Bibi Leila
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Mashhadi, Ali
    Rakhshani, Mohammad Hassan
    Babazadeh, Raheleh
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [4] Fear of childbirth in Iran: A systematic review of psychological intervention research
    Azizi, Marzieh
    Kamali, Mahsa
    Elyasi, Forouzan
    Shirzad, Mahboobeh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2021, 19 (05) : 401 - 420
  • [5] The effect of interventions in alleviating fear of childbirth in pregnant women: a systematic review
    Bakhteh, Azam
    Jaberghaderi, Nasrin
    Rezaei, Mansour
    Naghibzadeh, Zahra AL-Sadat
    Kolivand, Mitra
    Motaghi, Zahra
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 42 (01) : 5 - 21
  • [6] Prevalence and factors affecting the negative childbirth experiences: a systematic review
    Hosseini Tabaghdehi, Monirolsadate
    Kolahdozan, Sakineh
    Keramat, Afsaneh
    Shahhossein, Zohreh
    Moosazadeh, Mahmood
    Motaghi, Zahra
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (22): : 3849 - 3856
  • [7] Tokophobia (fear of childbirth): prevalence and risk factors
    Demsar, Karin
    Svetina, Matija
    Verdenik, Ivan
    Tul, Natasa
    Blickstein, Isaac
    Velikonja, Vislava Globevnik
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (02) : 151 - 154
  • [8] Antenatal fear of childbirth and emergency cesarean section delivery: a systematic narrative review
    Molgora, Sara
    Fenaroli, Valentina
    Cracolici, Elisa
    Saita, Emanuela
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 38 (04) : 436 - 454
  • [9] Interventions to treat fear of childbirth in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Webb, Rebecca
    Bond, Rod
    Romero-Gonzalez, Borja
    Mycroft, Rachel
    Ayers, Susan
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (12) : 1964 - 1977
  • [10] A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in preterm infants
    Weeks, Charlotte L.
    Marino, Luise, V
    Johnson, Mark J.
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2021, 40 (11) : 5576 - 5586