Influence of rectal prolapse on the asymmetry of the anal sphincter in patients with anal incontinence

被引:13
|
作者
Damon, H [1 ]
Henry, L [1 ]
Roman, S [1 ]
Barth, X [1 ]
Mion, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Edouard Herriot, Federat Specialites Digest, F-69437 Lyon 03, France
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-230X-3-23
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anal sphincter defects have been shown to increase pressure asymmetry within the anal canal in patients with fecal incontinence. However, this correlation is far from perfect, and other factors may play a role. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of rectal prolapse on anal pressure asymmetry in patients with anal incontinence. Methods: 44 patients, ( 42 women, mean age: 64 ( 11) years), complaining of anal incontinence, underwent anal vector manometry, endo-anal ultrasonography ( to assess sphincter defects) and pelvic viscerogram ( for the diagnosis of rectal prolapse). Resting and squeeze anal pressures, and anal asymmetry index at rest and during voluntary squeeze were determined by vector manometry. Results: Ultrasonography identified 19 anal sphincter defects; there were 9 cases of overt rectal prolapse, and 14 other cases revealed by pelvic viscerogram (recto-anal intussuception). Patients with rectal prolapse had a significantly higher anal sphincter asymmetry index at rest, whether patients with anal sphincter defects were included in the analysis or not (30 (3) % versus 20 (2) %, p < 0.005). Among patients without rectal prolapse, a higher anal sphincter asymmetry index during squeezing was found in patients with anal sphincter defects ( 27 ( 2) % versus 19 ( 2) %, p < 0.03). Conclusions: In anal incontinent patients, anal asymmetry index may be increased in case of anal sphincter defect and/or rectal prolapse. In the absence of anal sphincter defect at ultrasonogaphy, an increased anal asymmetry index at rest may point to the presence of a rectal prolapse.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of rectal prolapse on the asymmetry of the anal sphincter in patients with anal incontinence
    Henri Damon
    Luc Henry
    Sabine Roman
    Xavier Barth
    François Mion
    [J]. BMC Gastroenterology, 3
  • [2] Anal Sphincter Asymmetry in Anal Incontinence After Restorative Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer
    Sung-Bum Kang
    Nayoung Kim
    Kyoung-Ho Lee
    Young-Hoon Kim
    Jee Hyun Kim
    Jae-Sung Kim
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2008, 32 : 2083 - 2088
  • [3] Anal sphincter asymmetry in anal incontinence after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer
    Kang, Sung-Bum
    Kim, Nayoung
    Lee, Kyoung-Ho
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Kim, Jee Hyun
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 32 (09) : 2083 - 2088
  • [4] Rectal prolapse and anal incontinence
    Ballarin, A
    Vicenzi, L
    Mazzola, F
    Bonomo, S
    Ragusa, R
    Lolli, P
    Rosa, G
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH BIENNIAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, ECCP, 2003, : 203 - 206
  • [5] The value of sphincter asymmetry index in anal incontinence
    Jorge, JMN
    Habr-Gama, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2000, 15 (5-6) : 303 - 310
  • [6] The value of sphincter asymmetry index in anal incontinence
    J. Marcio N. Jorge
    Angelita Habr-Gama
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2000, 15 : 303 - 310
  • [7] ANAL PRESSURE STUDIES IN RECTAL PROLAPSE AND INCONTINENCE
    KEIGHLEY, MRB
    ARABI, Y
    SHINAGAWA, N
    ALEXANDERWILLIAMS, J
    [J]. GUT, 1978, 19 (05) : A457 - A458
  • [8] THE THIERSCH OPERATION FOR RECTAL PROLAPSE AND ANAL INCONTINENCE
    TURELL, R
    [J]. NEW YORK STATE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1954, 54 (06) : 791 - 795
  • [9] Anal sphincter trauma and anal incontinence in urogynecological patients
    Guzman Rojas, R. A.
    Kamisan Atan, I.
    Shek, K. L.
    Dietz, H. P.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 46 (03) : 363 - 366
  • [10] PHYSIOLOGICAL-STUDIES OF THE ANAL-SPHINCTER MUSCULATURE IN FECAL INCONTINENCE AND RECTAL PROLAPSE
    NEILL, ME
    PARKS, AG
    SWASH, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 68 (08) : 531 - 536