Validation of a clinicopathological and gene expression profile model to identify patients with cutaneous melanoma where sentinel lymph node biopsy is unnecessary

被引:23
|
作者
Johansson, I [1 ,2 ]
Tempel, D. [3 ]
Dwarkasing, J. T. [3 ]
Rentroia-Pacheco, B. [3 ]
Mattsson, J. [4 ]
Ny, L. [2 ]
Bagge, R. Olofsson [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Inst Clin Sci,Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] SkylineDx, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Sahlgrenska Ctr Canc Res,Dept Surg, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Univ Gothenburg, Wallenberg Ctr Mol & Translat Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
EJSO | 2022年 / 48卷 / 02期
关键词
CP-GEP model; Gene expression; Sentinel node; Melanoma; INTERDISCIPLINARY GUIDELINE; METASTASIS; DISSECTION; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In patients with cutaneous melanoma, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) serves as an important technique to asses disease stage and to guide adjuvant systemic therapy. A model using clinicopathologic and gene expression variables (CP-GEP; Merlin Assay) has recently been introduced to identify patients that may safely forgo SLNB. Herein we present data from an independent validation cohort of the CP-GEP model in Swedish patients. Methods: Archival histological material (primary melanoma tissue) from a prospectively collected cohort of 421 consecutive patients with pT1-T4 melanoma undergoing SLNB between 2006 and 2014 was analyzed using the CP-GEP model. CP-GEP combines Breslow thickness and patient age with the expression levels of eight genes from the primary melanoma. Stratification is based on their risk for nodal metastasis: CP-GEP Low Risk or CP-GEP High Risk. Results: The SLNB positivity rate was 13%. Of 421 primary melanomas, the CP-GEP model identified 86 patients as having a low risk for nodal metastasis. In patients with pT1-2 melanomas, the SLNB reduction rate was 35.4% (95% CI: 29.4-41.8) with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.5% (95% CI: 90.0-99.3). Among patients with pT1-3 melanomas, CP-GEP suggested a SLNB reduction rate of 24.0% (95% CI: 19.7 -28.8) and a NPV of 96.5% (95% CI: 90.1-99.3). Only one of 118 pT3 tumors was classified as CP-GEP Low Risk, and all pT4 tumors were classified as being high risk for nodal metastasis. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that CP-GEP can identify patients with a low risk for nodal metastasis. Patients with pT1-2 melanomas have the highest clinical benefit from using the test, where 35% of the patients could forgo a SLNB procedure. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 325
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of a clinicopathological and gene expression profile model for sentinel lymph node metastasis in primary cutaneous melanoma
    Mulder, E. E. A. P.
    Dwarkasing, J. T.
    Tempel, D.
    van der Spek, A.
    Bosman, L.
    Verver, D.
    Mooyaart, A. L.
    van der Veldt, A. A. M.
    Verhoef, C.
    Nijsten, T. E. C.
    Grunhagen, D. J.
    Hollestein, L. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 184 (05) : 944 - 951
  • [2] Validation of a clinicopathological and gene expression profile (CP-GEP) model for sentinel lymph node metastasis in primary cutaneous melanoma
    Mulder, E. E. A. P.
    Dwarkasing, J. T.
    Hollestein, L. M.
    Tempel, D.
    Bosman, L.
    Verver, D.
    Mooyaart, A. L.
    Van der Veldt, A. A. M.
    Verhoef, C.
    Nijsten, T. E. C.
    Grunhagen, D. J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 : 540 - 540
  • [3] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with cutaneous melanoma
    Belli, F
    Lenisa, L
    Gallino, G
    Maffioli, L
    Seregni, E
    Bombardieri, E
    Tragni, G
    Cascinelli, N
    XXIII NATIONAL CONGRESS SOCIETA ITALIANA DI CHIRURGIA ONCOLOGICA, 1999, : 367 - 372
  • [4] Cutaneous melanoma and sentinel lymph node biopsy: where are we today?
    Girod, Angelique
    Salmon, Remy
    Rodriguez, Jose
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2007, 94 (7-8) : 687 - 691
  • [5] Validation of a model combining clinicopathologic risk factors and a gene expression profile to identify primary melanoma patients who can safely forgo sentinel lymph node biopsy
    Meves, A.
    Yousaf, A. B.
    Tempel, D.
    Luna-Vargas, M.
    Chen, J.
    Dwarkasing, J.
    Kolodney, M. S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S766 - S766
  • [6] Cutaneous Melanoma and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
    A. C. J. van Akkooi
    J. H. W. de Wilt
    C. Verhoef
    A. M. M. Eggermont
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2008, 15 : 1808 - 1809
  • [7] Cutaneous melanoma and sentinel lymph node biopsy
    van Akkooi, A. C. J.
    de Wilt, J. H. W.
    Verhoef, C.
    Eggermont, A. M. M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (06) : 1808 - 1809
  • [8] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma
    Ribero, Simone
    Sportoletti Baduel, Eugenio
    Osella-Abate, Simona
    Dika, Emi
    Quaglino, Pietro
    Picciott, Franco
    Macripo, Giuseppe
    Bataille, Veronique
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI DERMATOLOGIA E VENEREOLOGIA, 2017, 152 (04): : 355 - 359
  • [9] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma
    de Oliveira, Andrea Fernandes
    Oliveira Santos, Ivan Dunshee de Abranches
    de Mello Tucunduva, Thais Cardoso
    Sanches, Luciana Garbelini
    Oliveira Filho, Renato Santos
    Simoes e Silva Enokihara, Milvia Maria
    Ferreira, Lydia Masako
    ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, 2007, 22 (05) : 332 - 336
  • [10] Gene expression profiling for molecular staging of cutaneous melanoma in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy
    Gerami, Pedram
    Cook, Robert W.
    Russell, Maria C.
    Wilkinson, Jeff
    Amaria, Rodabe N.
    Gonzalez, Rene
    Lyle, Stephen
    Jackson, Gilchrist L.
    Greisinger, Anthony J.
    Johnson, Clare E.
    Oelschlager, Kristen M.
    Stone, John F.
    Maetzold, Derek J.
    Ferris, Laura K.
    Wayne, Jeffrey D.
    Cooper, Chelsea
    Obregon, Roxana
    Delman, Keith A.
    Lawson, David
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 72 (05) : 780 - +