Comparison of sublingual therapeutic vaccine with antibiotics for the prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections

被引:59
|
作者
Lorenzo-Gomez, Maria F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Padilla-Fernandez, Barbara [4 ]
Garcia-Cenador, Maria B. [3 ]
Virseda-Rodriguez, Alvaro J. [2 ,3 ]
Martin-Garcia, Isidoro [5 ]
Sanchez-Escudero, Alfonso [6 ]
Vicente-Arroyo, Manuel J. [7 ]
Miron-Canelo, Jose A. [8 ]
机构
[1] IBSAL Salamanca Biomed Res Inst, Salamanca, Spain
[2] Univ Salamanca, Dept Surg, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[3] Univ Hlth Complex Salamanca, Dept Urol, Salamanca, Spain
[4] Univ Hosp Canary Isl Complex, Dept Urol, Tenerife, Spain
[5] Primary Care Ctr Univ Ctr, Salamanca, Spain
[6] Primary Care Ctr Penaranda, Salamanca, Spain
[7] Primary Care Ctr Capuchinos, Salamanca, Spain
[8] Univ Salamanca, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Salamanca 37007, Spain
关键词
recurrent urinary infections; bacterial vaccine; Uromune (MV 140); ESCHERICHIA-COLI; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; MUCOSAL; IMMUNIZATION; PREVENTION; VIRULENCE; FEMALE; BLIND; OM-89; CELLS;
D O I
10.3389/fcimb.2015.00050
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical impact of a prophylactic treatment with sublingual immunostimulation in the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) with the use of antibiotics. Material and Methods: Retrospective cohort study evaluating the medical records of 669 women with rUTIs; 339 had a 6-month prophylaxis with antibiotics and 360 a 3-month prophylaxis with a sublingual bacterial preparation (MV 140-Uromune (R)). The time frame after the prophylaxis-period until the appearance of a new infection (assessed by uroculture) was scored and followed during 1 year. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) and number needed to treat (NNT) were also calculated. Results: All patients treated with antibiotics experienced a new UTI during the scoring period of 12 months, being 19 days the median number of days free of UTIs (range 5-300). In the group treated with the bacterial preparation, 35 (9.7%) patients experienced an UTI in the same period. Kaplan-Meier curves comparing the accumulated survival (disease-free time) between both groups were significant different (P < 0.0001). The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 90.28% (87.18-93.38) and the number needed to treat (NNT) 1.1 (1.1-1.1). Conclusions: These results suggest that the treatment with this bacterial preparation significantly reduces the incidence of rUTIs, arising as an effective strategy to reduce the frequency of rUTIs. It reduces antibiotic consumption, matching the current recommendations due to the raise of antimicrobial resistance. Randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled, clinical trials are needed to establish, more accurately, the clinical impact of this bacterial preparation in patients with rUTIs.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-Effectiveness of a Sublingual Bacterial Vaccine for the Prophylaxis of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
    Carrion-Lopez, Pedro
    Martinez-Ruiz, Jesus
    Gimenez-Bachs, Jose Miguel
    Fernandez-Anguita, Pedro Jesus
    Diaz de Mera-Sanchez Migallon, Inmaculada
    Legido-Gomez, Oscar
    Rico-Marco, Saul
    Lorenzo-Sanchez, Marta Victoria
    Salinas-Sanchez, Antonio Santiago
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2022, : 730 - 736
  • [2] Analysis of the Efficacy of a Sublingual Bacterial Vaccine in the Prophylaxis of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection
    Carrion-Lopez, Pedro
    Martinez-Ruiz, Jesijs
    Libran-Garcia, Laura
    Miguel Gimenez-Bachs, Jose
    Pastor-Navarroa, Hector
    Salinas-Sancheza, Antonio S.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2020, 104 (3-4) : 293 - 300
  • [3] Evaluation of a therapeutic vaccine for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections versus prophylactic treatment with antibiotics
    Lorenzo-Gomez, M. F.
    Padilla-Fernandez, B.
    Garcia-Criado, F. J.
    Miron-Canelo, J. A.
    Gil-Vicente, A.
    Nieto-Huertos, A.
    Silva-Abuin, J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (01) : 127 - 134
  • [4] Evaluation of a therapeutic vaccine for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections versus prophylactic treatment with antibiotics
    M. F. Lorenzo-Gómez
    B. Padilla-Fernández
    F. J. García-Criado
    J. A. Mirón-Canelo
    A. Gil-Vicente
    A. Nieto-Huertos
    J. M. Silva-Abuin
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013, 24 : 127 - 134
  • [5] Prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections
    Vahlensieck, W.
    Bauer, H. -W.
    Piechota, H. J.
    Ludwig, M.
    Wagenlehner, F.
    UROLOGE, 2014, 53 (10): : 1468 - +
  • [6] Antibiotics for recurrent urinary tract infections
    Schooff, M
    Hill, K
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2005, 71 (07) : 1301 - 1302
  • [7] A sublingual nanofiber vaccine to prevent urinary tract infections
    Kelly, Sean H.
    Votaw, Nicole L.
    Cossette, Benjamin J.
    Wu, Yaoying
    Shetty, Shamitha
    Shores, Lucas S.
    Issah, Luqman A.
    Collier, Joel H.
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2022, 8 (47)
  • [9] PROPHYLAXIS OF RECURRENT URINARY-TRACT INFECTIONS
    GUIBERT, J
    MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES, 1991, 21 (2BIS): : 160 - 167
  • [10] Treatment and prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections
    Banas, B
    Kramer, B
    INTERNIST, 2005, 46 (12): : 1360 - +