Complications of stent placement in patients with esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Doosti-lrani, Amin [1 ,2 ]
Mansournia, Mohammad Ali [2 ]
Rahimi-Foroushani, Abbas [2 ]
Haddad, Peiman [3 ]
Holakouie-Naieni, Kourosh [2 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Canc Inst, Radiat Oncol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
EXPANDABLE METAL STENTS; CONVENTIONAL STENTS; ANTIREFLUX STENT; GASTRIC CARDIA; ENDOLUMINAL BRACHYTHERAPY; DISTAL ESOPHAGEAL; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ULTRAFLEX STENT; CLINICAL-TRIAL; PALLIATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0184784
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Palliative treatments and stents are necessary for relieving dysphagia in patients with esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to simultaneously compare available treatments in terms of complications. Methods Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi(2) test and was quantified by I-2. The results of this study were summarized in terms of Risk Ratio (RR). The random effects model was used to report the results. The rank probability for each treatment was calculated using the p-score. Results Out of 17855 references, 24 RCTs reported complications including treatment related death (TRD), bleeding, stent migration, aspiration, severe pain and fistula formation. In the ranking of treatments, thermal ablative therapy (p-score = 0.82), covered Evolution (R) stent (p-score = 0.70), brachytherapy (p-score = 0.72) and antireflux stent (p-score = 0.74) were better treatments in the network of TRD. Thermal ablative therapy (p-score = 0.86), the conventional stent (p-score = 0.62), covered Evolution (R) stent (p-score = 0.96) and brachytherapy (p-score = 0.82) were better treatments in the network of bleeding complications. Covered Evolution (R) (p-score = 0.78), uncovered (p-score = 0.88) and irradiation stents (p-score = 0.65) were better treatments in network of stent migration complications. In the network of severe pain, Conventional self-expandable nitinol alloy covered stent (p-score = 0.73), polyflex (p-score = 0.79), latex prosthesis (p-score = 0.96) and brachytherapy (p-score = 0.65) were better treatments. Conclusion According to our results, thermal ablative therapy, covered Evolution (R) stents, brachytherapy, and antireflux stents are associated with a lower risk of TRD. Moreover, thermal ablative therapy, conventional, covered Evolution (R) and brachytherapy had lower risks of bleeding. Overall, fewer complications were associated with covered Evolution (R) stent and brachytherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment-related complications in patients with esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Holakouie-Naieni, Kourosh
    Mansournia, Mohammad Ali
    Doosti-Irani, Amin
    Rahimi-Foroushani, Abbas
    Haddad, Peiman
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2021, 19 (01): : 37 - 48
  • [2] Clinical outcomes following stent placement in refractory benign esophageal stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Hassan, Cesare
    Frazzoni, Leonardo
    Miglio, Rossella
    Repici, Alessandro
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 48 (02) : 141 - 148
  • [3] Impact of Stent Versus Stent and Additional Modality for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Rodriguez, Andrea C.
    Lai, Andrew
    Shiani, Ashok
    Lipka, Seth
    Shen, Huafeng
    Lalama, Miguel
    Clayton, Steven B.
    Pinkas, Haim
    Kumar, Ambuj
    Brady, Patrick
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S736 - S737
  • [4] Stent placement to prevent strictures after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Bao-zhen
    Zhang, Yue
    Wang, Yi-dan
    Liao, Ye
    Zhang, Jing-jing
    Wu, Yu-fan
    Xiao, Ting-yue
    Sun, Si-yu
    Guo, Jin-tao
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2021, 34 (09)
  • [5] Obesity and mortality in patients with esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gupta, Arjun
    Majumder, Kaustav
    Arora, Nivedita
    Singh, Preet Paul
    Singh, Siddharth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (04)
  • [6] Systematic review and network meta-analysis: neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locoregional esophageal cancer
    Huang, Ta-Chen
    Hsu, Chih-Hung
    Lin, Chia-Chi
    Tu, Yu-Kang
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 45 (11) : 1023 - 1028
  • [7] Complications Associated With Esophageal Stenting. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tahir, Muhammad
    Bain, Andrew
    Rivera, Ramon E.
    Singh, Amanpal
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S177 - S178
  • [8] Prediction models for patients with esophageal or gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    van den Boorn, H. G.
    Engelhardt, E. G.
    van Kleef, J.
    Sprangers, M. A. G.
    van Oijen, M. G. H.
    Abu-Hanna, A.
    Zwinderman, A. H.
    Coupe, V. M. H.
    van Laarhoven, H. W. M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [9] Esophageal dilation in head and neck cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moss, William J.
    Pang, John
    Orosco, Ryan K.
    Weissbrod, Philip A.
    Brumund, Kevin T.
    Weisman, Robert A.
    Brigger, Matthew T.
    Coffey, Charles S.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2018, 128 (01): : 111 - 117
  • [10] Esophageal Stent in Acute Refractory Variceal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
    Songtanin, Busara
    Kahathuduwa, Chanaka
    Nugent, Kenneth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (02)