Vulnerability market as a public-good auction with privacy preservation

被引:3
|
作者
Vakilinia, Iman [1 ]
Sengupta, Shamik [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Florida, Sch Comp, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
Vulnerability market; Security management; Public-good auction; Privacy-preserving auction; Price of anarchy; SECURITY; SCHEME; PROOF;
D O I
10.1016/j.cose.2020.101807
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Exploitations of zero-day vulnerabilities cause enormous damages to organizations. Hence, organizations would invest in buying zero-day vulnerabilities to patch their systems. On the other hand, hackers are interested in buying zero-day vulnerabilities to exploit their targets. Considering such a market, the vulnerability finder decides whether to sell the vulnerability information to the organizations or to the hackers in the black market. In this paper, we model the vulnerability market as a public-good auction where the organizations collaboratively bid for the vulnerability information. In this case, an organization determines how much to invest in the vulnerability information to maximize its payoff. First, we characterize the auction and study the bidding strategies in centralized and decentralized approaches, and then, we compare the efficiency of the coalition. Moreover, as the bidding value in such an auction is sensitive information, we present a novel privacy-preserving mechanism based on cryptographic primitives to protect the organizations' bidding value. Our mechanism can also be applicable in other public-good auctions. Security analysis and performance evaluation are conducted showing the practicality of our proposed mechanism. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public-good games and the Balinese
    Veszteg, Robert F.
    Narhetali, Erita
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 37 (09) : 660 - 675
  • [2] Public-good provision with many participants
    Hellwig, MF
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2003, 70 (03): : 589 - 614
  • [3] Congestion effects in a public-good economy
    María C. Gallastegui
    Fritz Grafe
    Elena Inarra
    [J]. Journal of Economics, 1997, 66 : 189 - 204
  • [4] Vaccination as personal public-good provision
    Reddinger, J. Lucas
    Charness, Gary
    Levine, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2024, 224 : 481 - 499
  • [5] A public-good approach to environmental economy
    Choi, Jai-Young
    Yu, Eden S. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2019, 15 (03) : 269 - 280
  • [6] Congestion effects in a public-good economy
    Gallastegui, MC
    Grafe, F
    Inarra, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 66 (02) : 189 - 204
  • [7] What are the equilibria in public-good experiments?
    Wolff, Irenaeus
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2017, 150 : 83 - 85
  • [8] Contests with Alternative Public-Good Prizes
    Baik, Kyung Hwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMIC THEORY, 2016, 18 (04) : 545 - 559
  • [9] Partisanship, priming and participation in public-good schemes
    Briguglio, Marie
    Delaney, Liam
    Wood, Alex
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2018, 55 : 136 - 150
  • [10] A funding model for public-good clinical trials
    Winship, Ingrid M.
    McNeil, John
    Simes, R. John
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2013, 199 (02) : 90 - 91