Off-design simulation and performance of molten salt cavity receivers in solar tower plants under realistic operational modes and control strategies

被引:58
|
作者
Tehrani, S. Saeed Mostafavi [1 ]
Taylor, Robert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Mech & Mfg Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Concentrated solar power; Tower; Off-design; Energy and exergy analysis; Control strategies; SURFACE THERMAL-RADIATION; HEAT-TRANSFER FLUID; POWER-PLANT; NATURAL-CONVECTION; PARABOLIC TROUGH; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; DYNAMIC SIMULATION; HELIOSTAT FIELD; STORAGE-SYSTEM; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.032
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Solar irradiation is intermittent, but concentrated solar thermal (CST) plants are typically designed and analyzed solely based on their steady design point. Unlike coal power plants, however, CST plants frequently experience thermal loads well above and below their rated design point, leading to off-design operation for much of the operational year. Importantly, if a latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) system is employed, the receiver inlet temperature can vary under these conditions. To date, there is a clear lack of knowledge for how to handle off-design conditions in terms of developing appropriate control strategies to maximize the receiver thermal output and its operational region. In this study, a thermal model was developed and validated that is suitable for design/off-design performance analyses of molten salt cavity receivers in both steady state and transient conditions. The study investigated two control strategies - a fixed receiver flow rate (FF) and fixed receiver outlet temperature (FT) - for their off-design performance in each of two off-design operational modes (storage and non-storage). Solar field utilization (SFU) is variable in non-storage mode, but in the storage mode, it is whether variable or fixed at design point (SFU = 1). The feasible operating region in this study refers to the zone restricted by maximum allowable operational parameters defined based on design point analysis, mainly maximum receiver outlet temperature, maximum flow rate, and maximum receiver surface temperature. Through this analysis, it was found that receiver inlet temperatures above the design point (560 K) degrade the receiver performance in both control strategies and under all operational modes. The results also revealed that the maximum allowable receiver inlet temperature that maintains the receiver operation inside the feasible region could not go beyond 700 K or 600 K with the FF and FT strategies (in the storage mode with variable or fixed SFU), respectively. These values also indicate the charging cut-off temperature for the fluid flowing out in LHTES systems. In the non-storage mode, the receiver inlet temperature is remained constant at design point by varying the SFU over the time. While the design point direct normal irradiation (DNI) was 900 W m(-2), the maximum allowable DNI is 700 W m(-2) and 500 W m(-2) with the FF and FT strategies, respectively. These results motivate a hybrid control strategy that switches between the FF and FT strategies to maximize the performance and the number of operational hours of a CST plant during the day. As a final aspect of this study, off-design receiver efficiency correlations are developed that can be used in any simulation environment to accurately predict receiver performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 715
页数:18
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] MODELING ON/OFF-DESIGN PERFORMANCE OF SOLAR TOWER PLANTS USING SATURATED STEAM
    Colzi, F.
    Petrucci, S.
    Manzolini, G.
    Chacarteguia, R.
    Silva, P.
    Campanari, S.
    Sanchez, D.
    [J]. ES2010: PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, VOL 2, 2010, : 637 - 648
  • [2] PART LOAD BEHAVIOR OF MOLTEN SALT CAVITY RECEIVER SOLAR TOWER PLANTS UNDER STORAGE MODE OPERATIONAL MODE
    Tehrani, S. Saeed Mostafavi
    Taylor, Robert A.
    Ghazani, Ardalan Shafiei
    Saberi, Pouya
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, VOL 1, 2016,
  • [3] Optimization of Solar Tower molten salt cavity receivers for maximum yield based on annual performance assessment
    Schoettl, Peter
    Bern, Gregor
    van Rooyen, De Wet
    Pretel, Jose Antonio Fernandez
    Fluri, Thomas
    Nitz, Peter
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2020, 199 : 278 - 294
  • [4] Solar Tower Power Plants of Molten Salt External Receivers in Algeria: Analysis of Direct Normal Irradiation on Performance
    Rouibah, Abdelkader
    Benazzouz, Djamel
    Kouider, Rahmani
    Al-Kassir, Awf
    Garcia-Sanz-Calcedo, Justo
    Maghzili, K.
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (08):
  • [5] Switchover control strategies for improving performance of refrigeration systems under off-design conditions
    Kulkarni, MR
    Eiamworawutthikul, C
    [J]. HEAT TRANSFER ENGINEERING, 2001, 22 (05) : 41 - 49
  • [6] Off-design performance comparison of an organic Rankine cycle under different control strategies
    Hu, Dongshuai
    Zheng, Ya
    Wu, Yi
    Li, Saili
    Dai, Yiping
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 156 : 268 - 279
  • [7] Optimization of Solar Tower molten salt cavity receivers for maximum yield based on annual performance assessment (vol 199, pg 278, 2020)
    Schottl, Peter
    Bern, Gregor
    van Rooyen, De Wet
    Pretel, Jose Antonio Fernandez
    Fluri, Thomas
    Fraunhofer, Peter Nitz
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2021, 230 : 1199 - 1199
  • [8] Off-design performance of molten salt-driven Rankine cycles and its impact on the optimal dispatch of concentrating solar power systems
    Hamilton, William T.
    Newman, Alexandra M.
    Wagner, Michael J.
    Braun, Robert J.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 220 (220)
  • [9] Off-design performance of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle combined with organic Rankine cycle for maritime nuclear propulsion system under different control strategies
    He, Xinyu
    Du, Yadong
    Yang, Ce
    Hu, Chenxing
    Zhang, Hanzhi
    Zhao, Ben
    Gao, Jianbing
    Zhao, Wei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (15) : 23020 - 23038