Acute pulmonary embolism in patients presenting pulmonary deterioration after hospitalisation for non-critical COVID-19

被引:7
|
作者
Friz, Hernan Polo [1 ]
Gelfi, Elia [1 ]
Orenti, Annalisa [4 ]
Motto, Elena [1 ]
Primitz, Laura [1 ]
Donzelli, Tino [1 ]
Intotero, Marcello [2 ]
Scarpazza, Paolo [3 ]
Vighi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Cimminiello, Claudio [5 ]
Boracchi, Patrizia [4 ]
机构
[1] ASST Vimercate, Internal Med, Med Dept, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[2] ASST Vimercate, Diagnost Dept, Radiol, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[3] ASST Vimercate, Med Dept, Pulmonol, Vimercate Hosp, Vimercate, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Lab Med Stat Epidemiol & Biometry GA Maccacaro, Milan, Italy
[5] Italian Soc Angiol & Vasc Pathol, SIAPAV, Res & Study Ctr, Milan, Italy
关键词
COVID-19; venous thromboembolism; pulmonary embolism; d-dimer; CT angiography; RISK; RULE;
D O I
10.1111/imj.15307
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Emerging evidence suggests an association between COVID-19 and acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Aims To assess the prevalence of APE in patients hospitalised for non-critical COVID-19 who presented clinical deterioration, and to investigate the association of clinical and biochemical variables with a confirmed diagnosis of APE in these subjects. Methods All consecutive patients admitted to the internal medicine department of a general hospital with a diagnosis of non-critical COVID-19, who performed a computer tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for respiratory deterioration in April 2020, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Results Study populations: 41 subjects, median (interquartile range) age: 71.7 (63-76) years, CPTA confirmed APE = 8 (19.51%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.82-34.87%). Among patients with and without APE, no significant differences were found with regards symptoms, comorbidities, treatment, Wells score and outcomes. The optimal cut-off value of d-dimer for predicting APE was 2454 ng/mL, sensitivity (95% CI): 63 (24-91), specificity: 73 (54-87), positive predictive value: 36 (13-65), negative predictive value: 89 (71-98) and AUC: 0.62 (0.38-0.85). The standard and age-adjusted d-dimer cut-offs, and the Wells score >= 2 did not associate with confirmed APE, albeit a cut-off value of d-dimer = 2454 ng/mL showed an relative risk: 3.21; 95% CI: 0.92-13.97; P = 0.073. Heparin at anticoagulant doses was used in 70.73% of patients before performing CTPA. Conclusion Among patients presenting pulmonary deterioration after hospitalisation for non-critical COVID-19, the prevalence of APE is high. Traditional diagnostic tools to identify high APE pre-test probability patients do not seem to be clinically useful. These results support the use of a high index of suspicion for performing CTPA to exclude or confirm APE as the most appropriate diagnostic approach in this clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1242
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Post-acute prevalence of occult pulmonary embolism after hospitalisation for Covid-19
    van Voorthuizen, E. L.
    Peters, J. B.
    Leentjens, J.
    Van den Heuvel, M. M.
    Prokop, M.
    Van den Borst, B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [2] PULMONARY EMBOLISM RISK STRATIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19 AND ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM
    Golubykh, Konstantin
    Aladham, Ahmed
    Kovalenko, Iuliia
    Lnu, Kriti
    Wert, Yijin
    Ramesh, Navitha
    [J]. CHEST, 2022, 162 (04) : 1508A - 1508A
  • [3] Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism
    Koc, Ibrahim
    Yildiz, Ozlem
    Babalik, Mesiha
    Isigibol, Rahime Ozgur
    Ozmen, Sevda Unalli
    Zeytinoglu, Duygu
    Savas, Nazan Nalci
    Yapici, Ilhami
    Celikten, Halil
    Demirsoy, Sedat
    Deniz, Olgun
    [J]. TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 260 (02): : 127 - 133
  • [4] Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with and without COVID-19
    Trimaille, Antonin
    Curtiaud, Anais
    Matsushita, Kensuke
    Marchandot, Benjamin
    Von Hunolstein, Jean-Jacques
    Sato, Chisato
    Leonard-Lorant, Ian
    Sattler, Laurent
    Grunebaum, Lelia
    Ohana, Mickael
    Ohlmann, Patrick
    Jesel, Laurence
    Morel, Olivier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [5] Acute Pulmonary Embolism and COVID-19
    Poyiadji, Neo
    Cormier, Peter
    Patel, Parth Y.
    Hadied, Mohamad O.
    Bhargava, Pallavi
    Khanna, Kanika
    Nadig, Jeffrey
    Keimig, Thomas
    Spizarny, David
    Reeser, Nicholas
    Klochko, Chad
    Peterson, Edward L.
    Song, Thomas
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (03) : E335 - E338
  • [6] Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Patients Is Not Related to a Deterioration of Tissue Oxygenation
    Cicco, Sebastiano
    Albanese, F.
    Didonna, R.
    Magistro, A.
    Vacca, A.
    Cariddi, C.
    Lauletta, G.
    Pappagallo, F.
    Solimando, A. G.
    Ria, R.
    [J]. OXYGEN TRANSPORT TO TISSUE XLIII, 2022, 1395 : 99 - 103
  • [7] OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH PULMONARY EMBOLISM WITH HISTORY OF COVID-19 ARE AS POOR AS PATIENTS WITH PULMONARY EMBOLISM WITH SEVERE COVID-19
    Ho, Timothy D.
    Nandakumar, Shonit
    Zhong, Lily
    To, Magnus
    Heineke, Hyunju
    Ayutyanont, Napatkamon
    Kubomoto, Scott
    Sangodkar, Sandeep
    Biswas, Mimi S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 2077 - 2077
  • [8] Prevalence of Acute Pulmonary Embolism at Autopsy in Patients With COVID-19
    Zuin, Marco
    Engelen, Matthias M.
    Bilato, Claudio
    Vanassche, Thomas
    Rigatelli, Gianluca
    Verhamme, Peter
    Vandenbriele, Christophe
    Zuliani, Giovanni
    Roncon, Loris
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 171 : 159 - 164
  • [9] COVID-19 Complicated by Acute Pulmonary Embolism
    Xie, Yuanliang
    Wang, Xiang
    Yang, Pei
    Zhang, Shutong
    [J]. RADIOLOGY-CARDIOTHORACIC IMAGING, 2020, 2 (02):
  • [10] Acute pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 disease
    Kalemci, Serdar
    Sarihan, Aydin
    Zeybek, Arife
    Kargi, Ahmet Bulent
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 319 : 151 - 151