共 50 条
Validation of the one pass measure for motivational interviewing competence
被引:34
|作者:
McMaster, Fiona
[1
]
Resnicow, Ken
[2
]
机构:
[1] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Fac Med Sci, Cambridge CB1 1PT, England
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词:
Motivational interviewing;
Validation;
Practitioner competence;
DRINKING OUTCOMES;
CLINICIAN;
EMPATHY;
SKILLS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.014
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Objective: This paper examines the psychometric properties of the OnePass coding system: a new, user-friendly tool for evaluating practitioner competence in motivational interviewing (MI). We provide data on reliability and validity with the current gold-standard: Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity tool (MITI). Methods: We compared scores from 27 videotaped MI sessions performed by student counselors trained in MI and simulated patients using both OnePass and MITI, with three different raters for each tool. Reliability was estimated using intra-class coefficients (ICCs), and validity was assessed using Pearson's r. Results: OnePass had high levels of inter-rater reliability with 19/23 items found from substantial to almost perfect agreement. Taking the pair of scores with the highest inter-rater reliability on the MITI, the concurrent validity between the two measures ranged from moderate to high. Validity was highest for evocation, autonomy, direction and empathy. Conclusion: OnePass appears to have good inter-rater reliability while capturing similar dimensions of MI as the MITI. Despite the moderate concurrent validity with the MITI, the OnePass shows promise in evaluating both traditional and novel interpretations of MI. Practice implications: OnePass may be a useful tool for developing and improving practitioner competence in MI where access to MITI coders is limited. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 505
页数:7
相关论文