Reasoning about Topological and Cardinal Direction Relations Between 2-Dimensional Spatial Objects

被引:20
|
作者
Cohn, Anthony G. [1 ,2 ]
Li, Sanjiang [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Weiming [5 ]
Renz, Jochen [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Comp, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & Informat Technol, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Quantum Computat & Intelligent Syst, AMSS UTS Joint Res Lab, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[4] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Xian, Peoples R China
[5] Baidu China Co Ltd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Comp Sci, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
CONSISTENCY;
D O I
10.1613/jair.4513
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Increasing the expressiveness of qualitative spatial calculi is an essential step towards meeting the requirements of applications. This can be achieved by combining existing calculi in a way that we can express spatial information using relations from multiple calculi. The great challenge is to develop reasoning algorithms that are correct and complete when reasoning over the combined information. Previous work has mainly studied cases where the interaction between the combined calculi was small, or where one of the two calculi was very simple. In this paper we tackle the important combination of topological and directional information for extended spatial objects. We combine some of the best known calculi in qualitative spatial reasoning, the RCC8 algebra for representing topological information, and the Rectangle Algebra (RA) and the Cardinal Direction Calculus (CDC) for directional information. We consider two different interpretations of the RCC8 algebra, one uses a weak connectedness relation, the other uses a strong connectedness relation. In both interpretations, we show that reasoning with topological and directional information is decidable and remains in NP. Our computational complexity results unveil the significant differences between RA and CDC, and that between weak and strong RCC8 models. Take the combination of basic RCC8 and basic CDC constraints as an example: we show that the consistency problem is in P only when we use the strong RCC8 algebra and explicitly know the corresponding basic RA constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 532
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reasoning of cardinal direction relations of points based on one-dimensional topological relations
    Yang, Nan
    Wei, Ling
    Deng, Cheng-Yu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2008, : 1384 - +
  • [2] Reasoning about cardinal directions between extended objects
    Liu, Weiming
    Zhang, Xiaotong
    Li, Sanjiang
    Ying, Mingsheng
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2010, 174 (12-13) : 951 - 983
  • [3] Reasoning Mechanism for Cardinal Direction Relations
    Kor, Ah-Lian
    Bennett, Brandon
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: METHODOLOGY, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS, AIMSA 2010, 2010, 6304 : 32 - 41
  • [4] Presentation and reasoning of spatial objects direction relations based on strings
    Guo, P
    Yang, J
    Gao, Y
    Chen, HZ
    [J]. Progress in Intelligence Computation & Applications, 2005, : 675 - 682
  • [5] Reasoning about the inverse of cardinal direction relation
    Wang M.
    Hao Z.
    [J]. Information Technology Journal, 2010, 9 (05) : 935 - 941
  • [6] An model for spatial reasoning on the orientation relations between heterogeneous objects in three dimensional space
    Huo, Linlin
    Ouyang, Jihong
    Sun, Wei
    [J]. Journal of Information and Computational Science, 2012, 9 (14): : 4109 - 4121
  • [7] Fuzzy topological relations between fuzzy spatial objects
    唐新明
    Wolfgang Kainz
    [J]. 测绘科学, 2006, (S1) : 64 - 68
  • [8] Fuzzy topological relations between fuzzy spatial objects
    Tang, Xinming
    Fang, Yu
    Kainz, Wolfgang
    [J]. FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4223 : 324 - 333
  • [9] Research on classification of topological relations between spatial objects
    Guo, P
    Luo, Y
    Huang, FT
    [J]. Progress in Intelligence Computation & Applications, 2005, : 683 - 690
  • [10] Heterogeneous composition reasoning of direction relations with topological relations
    Liu, Yongshan
    Ma, Zhongwei
    Han, Xiangchun
    [J]. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2010, 6 (13): : 4379 - 4390