MCDM-Based R&D Project Selection: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:13
|
作者
de Souza, Dalton Garcia Borges [1 ,2 ,3 ]
dos Santos, Erivelton Antonio [4 ,5 ]
Soma, Nei Yoshihiro [1 ,2 ,6 ]
da Silva, Carlos Eduardo Sanches [4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Aeronaut Inst Technol, Div Comp Sci, BR-12 22890 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Inst Sci & Technol, BR-12247014 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Lorena Sch Engn, BR-12602810 Lorena, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Itajuba, Inst Ind Engn & Management, BR-37500903 Itajuba, Brazil
[5] Jose Rosario Vellano Univ, Dept Adm Course, BR-37132440 Alfenas, Brazil
[6] Univ Taubate, Dept Mech Engn, BR-12020270 Taubate, SP, Brazil
[7] Minist Educ, Secretariat Higher Educ, BR-70047900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
research and development; portfolio management; decision support systems; multi-attribute decision making; systematic literature review; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; DEVELOPMENT PORTFOLIO SELECTION; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; MAKING TECHNIQUES; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; MEAN-GINI; TOPSIS; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/su132111626
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
From small spin-offs deploying innovative software to big pharmaceutical complexes making vaccines, Research and Development (R&D) Project Portfolio Selection (PPS) is an essential strategic process for various companies. It was never easy to select a set of projects among many feasible possibilities, even for yesterday's paces. However, the world is rapidly changing, and so is R&D PPS. The portfolio objectives excel profit in the same manner that model constraints go beyond budget limitations. In parallel, project selection approaches and solving algorithms followed the increase of computational power. Despite all those changes, the importance of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods and the decision criteria used for R&D PPS, there is still room for a systematic literature review (SLR) for the topic. Thus, this paper offers an SLR of the existing literature from the half-century, 1970, and onward MCDM-based R&D PPS performed in Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection. We provide a comprehensive picture of this field, show how it is changing, and highlight standard practices and research opportunities in the area. We perform a broad classification of the MCDM methods, categorized by the nature of alternatives, types of integration approach, the MCDM method itself, and types of uncertainty, by the 66 studies in the SLR database. The portfolios' classification obeys the application domain and the number of projects. We have also explored all the 263 criteria found in the literature by grouping them according to experts from five Brazilian R&D organizations that together manage portfolios valued around US$ 5 billion a year, accounting for 38% of all Brazilian annual expenditure in R&D projects. We also include a bibliometric analysis of the considered papers and research opportunities highlighted or not explored by researchers. Given the increasing number of decision-making approaches and new technologies available, we hope to provide guidance on the topic and promote knowledge production and growth concerning the usage of MCDM methods and decision criteria in R&D PPS.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] R&D project selection versus R&D project generation
    Bordley, RF
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1998, 45 (04) : 407 - 413
  • [2] Addressing R&D Investment Decisions: a Critical Review and Comparison of R&D Project Selection Methods
    Verbano, Chiara
    Nosella, Anna
    Venturini, Karen
    Turra, Federica
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION, 2009, : 537 - +
  • [3] A MCDM-based framework for blockchain consensus protocol selection
    Filatovas, Ernestas
    Marcozzi, Marco
    Mostarda, Leonardo
    Paulavicius, Remigijus
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 204
  • [4] Classification of R&D projects and selection of R&D project management concept
    Kuchta, Dorota
    Skowron, Dorota
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2016, 46 (05) : 831 - 841
  • [5] R&D project selection - Martino,JP
    Martin, M
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1997, 44 (03) : 332 - 332
  • [6] The concept of effectiveness in R&D project selection
    Lee, M
    Om, K
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1997, 13 (5-6) : 511 - 524
  • [7] A decision framework for R&D project selection
    Coldrick, S
    Lawson, CP
    Ivey, PC
    Lockwood, C
    [J]. IEMC-2002: IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS: MANAGING TECHNOLOGY FOR THE NEW ECONOMY, 2002, : 413 - 418
  • [8] A PC-based decision support for R&D project selection
    Tan, RR
    [J]. INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT - THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP: THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP, 1997, : 396 - 396
  • [9] A fuzzy approach to R&D project portfolio selection
    Carlsson, Christer
    Fuller, Robert
    Heikkila, Markku
    Majlender, Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2007, 44 (02) : 93 - 105
  • [10] A MCDM-based model for vendor selection: a case study in the particleboard industry
    Reza Zanjirani Farahani
    Moslem Fadaei
    [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2012, 23 (4) : 685 - 690