The EU's Request for Arbitration Under the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement
被引:0
|
作者:
Dolle, Tobias
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
FratiniVergano European Lawyers, Woluwe St Lambert, Belgium
FratiniVergano European Lawyers, Singapore, SingaporeFratiniVergano European Lawyers, Woluwe St Lambert, Belgium
Dolle, Tobias
[1
,2
]
Medina, Lourdes
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
FratiniVergano European Lawyers, Woluwe St Lambert, Belgium
FratiniVergano European Lawyers, Singapore, SingaporeFratiniVergano European Lawyers, Woluwe St Lambert, Belgium
Medina, Lourdes
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] FratiniVergano European Lawyers, Woluwe St Lambert, Belgium
[2] FratiniVergano European Lawyers, Singapore, Singapore
Trade law;
EU trade law;
Trade dispute;
International trade dispute settlement;
Trade Agreements;
Dispute Settlement;
Arbitration;
WTO Dispute Settlement;
Export restrictions;
Forum clauses;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号:
030207 ;
摘要:
On 20 June 2019, the European Union's (EU's) Delegation to Ukraine submitted a Note Verbale to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine requesting ion behalf of the European Union, the establishment of an arbitration panel pursuant to Article 306 of the Association Agreement of 21 March 2014 between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part'. The dispute concerns Ukraine's export restrictions on timber and unsawn wood of certain species, as well as on unprocessed timber of all species, for a period of ten years. While the restrictions appear to be legally difficult to justify for Ukraine, the more interesting and noteworthy element to this dispute is that it is the first trade dispute that the EU is pursuing under a bilateral preferential trade agreement, even though it relates to disciplines that mirror World Trade Organization (%VTO) rules and could as well be pursued in the framework of WTO dispute settlement. The article reviews the case and discusses the significance and the EU's deliberate choice of dispute settlement within the context of the trade agreement.
机构:
Univ Birmingham, Sch Law, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, EnglandUniv Birmingham, Sch Law, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
Dragneva, Rilka
Wolczuk, Kataryna
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Birmingham, Ctr Russian Eurasian & East European Studies, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, EnglandUniv Birmingham, Sch Law, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
机构:
Nicolaus Copernicus Univ Torun, Fac Polit Sci & Int Studies, Torun, PolandNicolaus Copernicus Univ Torun, Fac Polit Sci & Int Studies, Torun, Poland
机构:
Univ Latvia, Fac Social Sci, Dept Polit Sci, Lomonosova St 1A, LV-1019 Riga, LatviaUniv Latvia, Fac Social Sci, Dept Polit Sci, Lomonosova St 1A, LV-1019 Riga, Latvia
机构:
Leiden Univ, Fac Governance & Global Affairs, Inst Secur & Global Affairs, Leiden, NetherlandsLeiden Univ, Fac Governance & Global Affairs, Inst Secur & Global Affairs, Leiden, Netherlands
Dimitrova, Antoaneta L.
Dragneva, Rilka
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Law Sch, Birmingham, W Midlands, EnglandLeiden Univ, Fac Governance & Global Affairs, Inst Secur & Global Affairs, Leiden, Netherlands