Impact of Resident and Fellow Participation on Surgical Outcomes in Breast Conserving Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Srour, Marissa K. [1 ]
Manguso, Nicholas [1 ]
Mirocha, James [2 ]
Chung, Alice [1 ]
Giuliano, Armando E. [1 ]
Amersi, Farin [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Res Inst, CTSI, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
Positive margin rates; Breast conserving surgery; Resident education; Surgical trainee; ONCOLOGY CONSENSUS GUIDELINE; AMERICAN SOCIETY; IRRADIATION; MARGINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.07.014
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Few studies examine the impact of surgical trainee involvement on tumor-free margins in breast conserving surgery (BCS). Our objective was to investigate the impact of resident and fellow involvement on positive margins rates following BCS for invasive breast cancer (BC). DESIGN: We identified female patients who had BCS for BC between January 2005 to December 2015. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Around 1089 patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: Of 1089 patients, mean age was 63 (range 43-99) years. Around 768 patients (70.1%) required pre-operative localization, and 328 patients (29.9%) had a palpable cancer. Nonpalpable cancers had a smaller volume of specimen tissue excised (p = 0.0005) compared to palpable cancers, and no significant difference was observed in the positive margin rate between the nonpalpable group compared to the palpable group (24.7% nonpalpable vs. 25.3% palpable, p = 0.88). Nonpalpable cancer positive margin rates were 23.9% (n = 102/427) for cases performed by an attending surgeon, 25.0% (n = 15/60) with a junior resident (PGY 2-3), 28.6% (n = 8/28) with a senior resident (PGY 4-5), and 25.7% (n = 65/253) with a fellow, which were not statistically significant (p = 0.89). Palpable cancer positive margin rates were 27.6% (n = 47/170) for cases performed by an attending, 13.9% (n = 5/36) with an intern (PGY-1), 40.9% (n = 9/22) with a junior resident, 0% (n = 0/8) with a senior resident, and 23.9% (n = 22/92) with a fellow, which were also not significantly different (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Resident and fellow participation in BCS for BC does not appear to impact the rate of positive margins. ((C) 2019 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 149
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resident and Fellow Participation in Breast Surgery: A NSQIP Clinical Outcomes Analysis
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Pyfer, Bryan
    Chen, Lilian
    Czerniecki, Brian
    Tchou, Julia
    Fisher, Carla
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 : 21 - 21
  • [2] Resident and Fellow Participation in Breast Surgery: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP Clinical Outcomes Analysis
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Pyfer, Bryan
    Chen, Lilian
    Czerniecki, Brian
    Tchou, Julia
    Fisher, Carla
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 221 (05) : 988 - 994
  • [3] Resident and Fellow Participation in Breast Surgery: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP Clinical Outcomes Analysis
    Hansen, N.
    BREAST DISEASES, 2016, 27 (03): : 205 - 205
  • [4] Are Breast Cancer Outcomes Compromised by General Surgical Resident Participation in the Operation?
    Tsigonis, Abraham M.
    Landercasper, Jeffrey
    Al-Hamadani, Mohammed
    Linebarger, Jared H.
    Vang, Choua A.
    Johnson, Jeanne M.
    Marchese, Edward
    Marcou, Kristen A.
    Hudak, Jane M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 72 (06) : 1109 - 1117
  • [5] Surgical opinion of cosmetic outcomes following breast conserving surgery for primary breast cancer
    Hopper, N.
    Jones, N.
    Williams, R. J.
    Vaughan-Williams, E.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 5 (03): : 7 - 7
  • [6] Potential impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive breast cancer
    Pengel, K. E.
    Schlief, A.
    Paape, A.
    Teertstra, J.
    Muller, S.
    Bartelink, H.
    Rutgers, E.
    Gilhuijs, K. G. A.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 6 (07): : 62 - 62
  • [7] Impact of fellow compared to resident assistance on outcomes of minimally invasive surgery
    Sherif Aly
    Susanna W. L. de Geus
    Cullen O. Carter
    Teviah E. Sachs
    Donald T. Hess
    Jennifer F. Tseng
    Luise I. M. Pernar
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 1554 - 1562
  • [8] Impact of fellow compared to resident assistance on outcomes of minimally invasive surgery
    Aly, Sherif
    de Geus, Susanna W. L.
    Carter, Cullen O.
    Sachs, Teviah E.
    Hess, Donald T.
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    Pernar, Luise I. M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (02): : 1554 - 1562
  • [9] Impact of surgical margin status and time interval between surgery and radiotherapy on outcome after breast conserving therapy for invasive breast cancer
    Schramm, A
    Eiermann, W
    Feldmann, H
    Raab, G
    Molls, M
    Würschmidt, F
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2002, 178 : 3 - 3
  • [10] Outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery compared to breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients
    Farooqi, Nifasat
    Vohra, Lubna
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : 246 - 247