共 43 条
Knowledge transfer and home-market innovativeness: A comparison of emerging and advanced economy multinationals
被引:9
|作者:
Steinberg, Philip J.
[1
,7
]
Urbig, Diemo
[2
,3
,7
]
Procher, Vivien D.
[4
,5
,7
]
Volkmann, Christine
[6
]
机构:
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Innovat Management & Strategy, Nettelbosje 2, NL-9747 AE Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Brandenburg Univ Technol Cottbus Senftenberg, Inst Business & Econ, Pl Deutsch Einheit 1, D-03046 Cottbus, Germany
[3] Indiana Univ Bloomington, Inst Dev Strategies, 1315 East 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[4] Philipps Univ Marburg, Sch Business & Econ, Univ Str 25, D-35037 Marburg, Germany
[5] RWI Leibniz Inst Wirtschaftsforsch, Hohenzollernstr 1-3, D-45128 Essen, Germany
[6] Univ Wuppertal, Schumpeter Sch Business & Econ, Gaussstr 20, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany
[7] Univ Wuppertal, Jackstadt Ctr Entrepreneurship & Innovat Res, Gaussstr 20, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany
关键词:
Catch-up strategies;
Knowledge transfer;
Knowledge integration;
Emerging market multinationals;
Technological upgrading;
Innovation and R&
D;
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT;
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE;
MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES;
ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY;
INTERNATIONALIZATION;
FLOWS;
FIRM;
ACQUISITION;
ENTERPRISES;
SUBSIDIARIES;
D O I:
10.1016/j.intman.2021.100873
中图分类号:
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号:
12 ;
1201 ;
1202 ;
120202 ;
摘要:
Emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs) increasingly access foreign technology and knowledge by internationalizing their R&D activities. Since technological laggardness hinders efficient knowledge transfer, a successful catch-up with advanced-economy multinational enterprises (AMNEs) requires EMNEs to transfer foreign knowledge across national boundaries more effectively. However, we lack a clear understanding of how EMNEs manage this knowledge transfer and integration and to what extent the employment and effectiveness of corresponding facilitation mechanisms may differ from AMNEs. Adopting a sender-recipient model and drawing on arguments from learning theory and transaction costs economics, we suggest that EMNEs benefit more from and, consequently, are more likely to engage in mechanisms to increase recipient capabilities and sender motivation. In a comparative analysis of Chinese, Indian, German, and U.S. MNEs and focusing on frequent international exchange of R&D personnel regarding recipient capabilities and the governance of foreign R&D activities regarding sender motivation, we observe positive relationships with home-market innovation for EMNEs, but not for AMNEs. Moreover, we observe that EMNEs exploit this positive effect and are more likely to use these mechanisms when focusing on technology- than on market-seeking.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文