Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review

被引:5
|
作者
Hamad, Khalid [1 ]
Konan, Sujith [1 ]
机构
[1] UCLH, Orthopaed Dept, 1st Floor,250 Euston Rd, London NW1 2PG, England
关键词
ETO; Extended trochanteric osteotomy; Revision hip arthroplasty; ETO union rate; Aseptic loosening; Prosthetic joint infection; FEMORAL OSTEOTOMY; 2-STAGE REVISION; RISK-FACTORS; FIXATION; OUTCOMES; RATES; SAFE;
D O I
10.1186/s42836-022-00115-w
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) in revision hip arthroplasty provides direct access to the femoral medullary canal and facilitates removal of implants and re-implantation. This study looks at objective outcomes of ETO from a systematic review of the literature and a case series of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases with ETOs from the authors' local institution. Methods (1) The National Institutes of Health (NIH) national library of medicine was searched for studies related to ETO and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) technique were followed. (2) Case series of 23 revision THAs with ETOs from University College London Hospital (UCLH) were retrospectively analyzed with a minimum of 2-year follow-up for radiological outcomes. Results (1) The main revision THAs diagnoses were aseptic loosening (880/1,386; 63.4%), prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (301/1,386; 21.7%) and periprosthetic THA fractures (78/1,386; 5.6%). Other diagnoses, including non-specified reasons for THA revision in the chosen studies, accounted for 9.2% (127/1,386). The total mean was a union rate of 95.2%, an infection eradication rate of 91.6%, a femoral stem subsidence rate of 16.6%, with the rate of subsidence more than 5 mm being 10.7%. ETO proximal migration was reported in 7.8% of ETOs; however, it rarely required re-attachment (0.9%). Intraoperative fracture during revision THA with ETO was reported to be at a rate of 5%; while postoperative femoral fracture rate was at 7.8%. (2) All 24 cases had radiographic union at 3 to 6 months and there was no reported femoral stem subsidence. Conclusion The overall outcome of this literature review provides moderate-quality evidence indicating that ETO provides safe outcome for revision THAs in single and 2-stage revision surgeries with low ETO non-union, femoral stem subsidence, greater trochanter (GT) proximal migration and fracture rates in the different diagnoses groups of revision THA at over 2-year follow up. In the case series group, there was radiographic union of all ETOs with no reported femoral stem subsidence or periprosthetic fractures.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review
    Khalid Hamad
    Sujith Konan
    [J]. Arthroplasty, 4
  • [2] Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Wyles, Cody C. C.
    Hannon, Charles P. P.
    Viste, Anthony
    Perry, Kevin I. I.
    Trousdale, Robert T. T.
    Berry, Daniel J. J.
    Abdel, Matthew P. P.
    [J]. JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [3] Outcomes and Risk Factors of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
    Malahias, Michael-Alexander
    Gkiatas, Ioannis
    Selemon, Nicolas A.
    De Filippis, Roberto
    Gu, Alex
    Greenberg, Alex
    Sculco, Peter K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (11): : 3410 - 3416
  • [4] Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty
    Chen, WM
    McAuley, JP
    Engh, CA
    Hopper, RH
    Engh, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (09): : 1215 - 1219
  • [5] Extended trochanteric osteotomy is a safe procedure in two-stage hip revision: a systematic review of the literature
    Cacciola, Giorgio
    Giustra, Fortunato
    Bosco, Francesco
    Aprato, Alessandro
    De Meo, Federico
    Cavaliere, Pietro
    Vezza, Daniele
    Giachino, Matteo
    Sabatini, Luigi
    Masse, Alessandro
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2023, 33 (07): : 2695 - 2702
  • [6] Extended trochanteric osteotomy is a safe procedure in two-stage hip revision: a systematic review of the literature
    Giorgio Cacciola
    Fortunato Giustra
    Francesco Bosco
    Alessandro Aprato
    Federico De Meo
    Pietro Cavaliere
    Daniele Vezza
    Matteo Giachino
    Luigi Sabatini
    Alessandro Massè
    [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2023, 33 : 2695 - 2702
  • [7] Trochanteric osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Sundaram, Kavin
    Siddiqi, Ahmed
    Kamath, Atul F.
    Higuera-Rueda, Carlos A.
    [J]. EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2020, 5 (08) : 477 - 485
  • [8] Extended trochanteric osteotomy via the direct lateral approach in revision hip arthroplasty
    MacDonald, SJ
    Cole, C
    Guerin, J
    Rorabeck, CK
    Bourne, RB
    McCalden, RW
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (417) : 210 - 216
  • [9] Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Followed by Cemented Impaction Allografting in Revision Hip Arthroplasty
    Charity, John
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    Gusmao, David
    Bauze, Adrian
    Timperley, John
    Gie, Graham
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (01): : 154 - 160
  • [10] Biomechanical comparison of extended trochanteric osteotomy and slot osteotomy for femoral component revision in total hip arthroplasty
    Khanna, Gaurav
    Bourgeault, Craig A.
    Kyle, Richard F.
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 22 (05) : 599 - 602