Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Versus Watchful Waiting and Pelvic Floor Disorders in Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:54
|
作者
Wu, You [1 ,2 ]
McInnes, Natalia [2 ,3 ]
Leong, Yvonne [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Room B4-401,800 Commissioners Rd East, London, ON N6H 5W9, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Populat Hlth Res Inst, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
postpartum; pelvic floor disorders; muscle training; systematic review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; FECAL INCONTINENCE; POSTNATAL URINARY; SEXUAL FUNCTION; FOLLOW-UP; EXERCISES; DYSFUNCTION; CHILDBIRTH; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1097/SPV.0000000000000513
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is often recommended to treat postpartum urinary incontinence (UI). However, the role of postpartum PFMT in pelvic organ prolapse (POP), sexual function, and anal incontinence (AI) remains unclear. We therefore aim to assess the efficacy of postpartum PFMT on these pelvic floor disorders. Methods: This study is a meta-analysis consisting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro. We also sought after grey literature including conference proceedings. We included RCTs comparing PFMT versus watchful waiting in women with stage II or less POP within 1 year postpartum. Two authors independently performed study screening, risk of bias assessments, and data extraction. Results: Fifteen RCTs (3845 patients) were included. Women undergoing PFMT less likely report bothersome POP symptoms (risk ratio [RR], 0.48 [0.30-0.76]; very low-quality evidence). There is no significant difference in the number of women with stage II or greater POP (RR, 0.74 [0.45-1.24]; moderate-quality evidence). Fewer women receiving PFMT report the presence of sexual dysfunction (RR, 0.48 [0.30-0.77]; low-quality evidence). There is no significant difference in AI symptoms (RR, 1.11 [0.82-1.51]), but PFMT may be more beneficial for women with anal sphincter injuries (standardized mean differencein AI scores, -0.57 [-1.12 to -0.02]; low-quality evidence). Women receiving PFMT less likely report UI (RR, 0.44 [0.25-0.75]; moderate-quality evidence) with a more pronounced effect on stress UI (SUI). Conclusions: At present, it remains uncertain whether postpartum PFMT improves POP symptoms because of very low-quality evidence, and more high-quality RCTs are needed in this area. The POP staging will likely not change with postpartum PFMT. The PFMT may result in improved postpartum sexual function compared to watchful waiting, and may provide benefit for AI in women with anal sphincter injuries. Postpartum PFMT likely reduces the risk of UI, particularly stress urinary incontinence symptoms. There is currently little evidence about postpartum PFMT and long-term pelvic floor function.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 149
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pelvic floor muscle training in telerehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hao, Jie
    Yao, Zixuan
    Remis, Andreas
    Huang, Biying
    Li, Yanfei
    Yu, Xin
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 309 (05) : 1753 - 1764
  • [2] Pelvic floor muscle training in telerehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jie Hao
    Zixuan Yao
    Andréas Remis
    Biying Huang
    Yanfei Li
    Xin Yu
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2024, 309 : 1753 - 1764
  • [3] Pelvic floor muscle training for women with lumbopelvic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vesentini, Giovana
    Prior, Joanna
    Ferreira, Paulo H.
    Hodges, Paul W.
    Rudge, Marilza
    Ferreira, Manuela L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2020, 24 (10) : 1865 - 1879
  • [4] Pelvic floor and abdominal muscle cocontraction in women with and without pelvic floor dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vesentinia, Giovana
    El Dib, Regina
    Rachele Righesso, Leonardo Augusto
    Piculo, Fernanda
    Marini, Gabriela
    Rago Ferraz, Guilherme Augusto
    Paranhos Calderon, Iracema de Mattos
    Pascon Barbosa, Angelica Mercia
    Cunha Rudge, Marilza Vieira
    [J]. CLINICS, 2019, 74
  • [5] The efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Chunbo
    Gong, Yuping
    Wang, Bei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (07) : 981 - 992
  • [6] The efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chunbo Li
    Yuping Gong
    Bei Wang
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2016, 27 : 981 - 992
  • [7] The effect of pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a meta-analysis
    Ting Wang
    Zhengfang Wen
    Meng Li
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2022, 33 : 1789 - 1801
  • [8] The effect of pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Ting
    Wen, Zhengfang
    Li, Meng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (07) : 1789 - 1801
  • [9] Supervised versus unsupervised pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of women with urinary incontinence - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kharaji, Ghazal
    ShahAli, Shabnam
    Ebrahimi-Takamjani, Ismail
    Sarrafzadeh, Javad
    Sanaei, Fateme
    Shanbehzadeh, Sanaz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 (07) : 1339 - 1349
  • [10] Supervised versus unsupervised pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of women with urinary incontinence — a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ghazal Kharaji
    Shabnam ShahAli
    Ismail Ebrahimi-Takamjani
    Javad Sarrafzadeh
    Fateme Sanaei
    Sanaz Shanbehzadeh
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2023, 34 : 1339 - 1349