The Impact of COVID-19 on Plastic Surgery Home Program Match Rates

被引:17
|
作者
Faletsky, Adam [1 ,2 ]
Zitkovsky, Helen [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Lifei [1 ]
机构
[1] Lahey Hosp & Med Ctr, Burlington, MA USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
integrated; match; plastic surgery; trends; COVID-19; visiting subinternships; audition rotations; away rotations; home program; ROTATIONS; APPLICANTS;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000002981
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Historically, integrated plastic surgery is one of the most competitive specialties in the residency match. In the 2020-2021 residency application cycle, plastic surgery programs were forced to adjust how they select applicants because of the COVID-19 pandemic disrupting visiting subinternships. We hypothesize that a higher proportion of plastic surgery applicants matched at their home institution during the 2020-2021 application cycle secondary to the implementation of COVID-19-related restrictions. Methods Between March 24 and 27, 2021, we used publicly available, online plastic surgery-specific spreadsheets to analyze plastic surgery applicant information over the course of 3 application cycles (2018-2019, 2019-2020, and 2020-2021) for the top 50 plastic surgery programs. We collected data corresponding to the matched plastic surgery applicants' medical school, the institution at which they matched, and whether they had previous communication with their matched program. Results Our search yielded information on 128 applicants from the 2019 match cycle, 129 applicants from the 2020 match cycle, and 133 applicants from the 2021 application cycle. In 2019 and 2020, 15 (11.7%) and 22 (17.1%) plastic surgery applicants matched at their home program, respectively. In 2021, 32 (24.1%) of plastic surgery applicants matched at their home program (P = 0.032). When stratified by reputation rank, home program match rates among programs ranked 1-25 in 2021 had a large increase over the 2020 match cycle (28.4% vs 16.7%), whereas the home match rates of programs ranked 26-50 in 2021 (17.3%) held level with that of 2020 (17.6%). Conversely, for those not matched to their home programs, only 20 (19.8%) in 2021 reported having had any prior contact with their matched programs compared with 54 (50.5%) in 2020 (P < 0.001). Conclusions The 2020-2021 plastic surgery application cycle matched a significantly higher proportion of applicants at their home institution. With the temporary discontinuation of visiting subinternships during the 2020-2021 application cycle, it is likely that both plastic surgery programs and applicants compensate for this loss of in-person exposure by turning to home applicants and home institutions, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 6
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Plastic Surgery Match Rates
    Lopez, Christopher D.
    Girard, Alisa
    Bekisz, Jonathan M.
    Suresh, Visakha
    Yang, Robin
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 149 (06) : 1270E - 1271E
  • [2] COVID-19 Effects on 2021 Home Program Match Rates at Integrated Plastic Surgery Programs
    Ranti, Daniel L.
    Liu, Helen
    Wasserburg, J. Roscoe
    Rutland, John W.
    Katz, Abigail
    Zoghbi, Yasmina
    Sayegh, Farah
    Taub, Peter J.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 149 (02) : 368E - 369E
  • [3] Staying Close to Home: The Effects of COVID-19 on the Plastic Surgery Residency Match
    Hollins, Andrew W.
    Zhang, Gloria X.
    Stoehr, Jenna R.
    Atia, Andrew
    Sergesketter, Amanda R.
    Wickenheisser, Victoria A.
    Ko, Jason H.
    Phillips, Brett T.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (09) : E3864
  • [4] Home Sweet Home: The Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Antezana, Luis A.
    Rode, Matthew
    Muro-Cardenas, Jose
    Xie, Katherine
    Weissler, Jason
    Bakri, Karim
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 150 (02) : 492E - 494E
  • [5] The Student You Know: Orthopedic Surgery Home Program Match Rates and Geographic Relationships Before and After COVID-19
    Nestler, Anthony J.
    Feibel, Benjamin M.
    Beason, Austin M.
    Besserman, Kathryn
    Mounce, Samuel D.
    Bailey, James R.
    Delfino, Kristin R.
    Allan, Donald G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 80 (03) : 476 - 482
  • [6] The Impact of COVID-19 on the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match
    Whisonant, Cees T.
    Shahriari, Shawhin R. K.
    McDonald, Casey
    Hough, Tyler
    Ederle, Amanda C.
    Borah, Gregory L.
    [J]. SURGERY JOURNAL, 2022, 08 (03): : E257 - E261
  • [7] COVID-19 and the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match: An Update on Match Trends by Applicant Location
    Kebede, Sara
    Marxen, Troy
    Om, Anjali
    Bakayoko, Ngafla
    Losken, Albert
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (09) : E4527
  • [8] Effect of COVID-19 on Geographic Distribution of the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match
    Om, Anjali
    Losken, Albert
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (06) : E3676
  • [9] Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Asadourian, Paul A.
    Murphy, Alexander, I
    Marano, Andrew A.
    Rohde, Christine H.
    Wu, June K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 78 (06) : 1923 - 1929
  • [10] The Impact of COVID-19 on Plastic Surgery Residency Training
    Nicola Zingaretti
    Filippo Contessi Negrini
    Alessandro Tel
    Marco Mario Tresoldi
    Vittorio Bresadola
    Pier Camillo Parodi
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2020, 44 : 1381 - 1385