SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF POLICY SCENARIOS

被引:0
|
作者
Streimikiene, Dalia [1 ]
Mikalauskiene, Asta [1 ]
Barakauskaite-Jakubauskiene, Neringa [1 ]
机构
[1] Vinius Univ, Kaunas Fac Humanities, LT-44280 Kaunas, Lithuania
来源
关键词
sustainability; policy scenarios; assessment of policy scenarios; the European Union; ANALYSIS MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
During EU Framework 7 project PLANETS 10 policy scenarios were developed by applying 6 models covering different modelling philosophies and ranging from Top-down to Bottom-up models. These policy scenarios were developed by combining 2 alternatives climate targets and 5 different modes of achieving the different climate change mitigation targets. Analysis of scenarios results provides a lot of information however it is difficult to judge about these scenarios and to develop policy recommendations as some scenarios show better results according contradicting criteria such as costs and GHG emission reduction therefore the sustainability assessment approach was proposed seeking to rank policy scenarios. Criteria for sustainability assessment of policy scenarios were developed based on EU sustainable energy policy targets: increase use of renewable, increase of energy use efficiency and GHG emissions reduction. These main EU energy policy targets are called 20/20/20. The European Union's '20/20/20' targets for 2020 are the following: reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20% comparing with 1990 level (to become a 30% reduction if other major global economies join); increase the share of renewable in the final energy consumption to 20% and to achieve 20% improvement in energy efficiency compared to the level in 2020 if existing trends were to continue. Therefore EU energy policy scenarios were ranked based on these criteria and scenario costs. The results of multi-criteria analysis performed in the paper allow indentifring the best EU energy policy scenarios in terms of energy sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 184
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Alternative agricultural policy scenarios, sector modelling and indicators: A sustainability assessment
    Lehtonen, H
    Aakkula, J
    Rikkonen, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2005, 26 (04): : 63 - 93
  • [2] Sustainability assessment framework for scenarios - SAFS
    Arushanyan, Yevgeniya
    Ekener, Elisabeth
    Moberg, Asa
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 63 : 23 - 34
  • [3] Assessment of agricultural sustainability in changing scenarios
    Goswami, Prashant
    Nishad, Shiv Narayan
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2014, 106 (04): : 552 - 557
  • [4] Perceptions of biomass energy sustainability in policy scenarios of China
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Liu, Qiqi
    Yang, Lu
    Yang, Qing
    Li, Yujiao
    Yang, Yu
    Zhou, Chao
    Wang, Xu
    Wang, Yang
    Gao, Guofu
    Liu, Wenxiang
    Cheng, Ping
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (17)
  • [5] Measuring the sustainability of policy scenarios: Emergy-based strategic environmental assessment of the Chinese paper industry
    Ren, Jing-Ming
    Zhang, Lei
    Wang, Ru-song
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (02) : 156 - 161
  • [6] Simulating the impacts of policy scenarios on the sustainability performance of infrastructure projects
    Yao Hong
    Shen Liyin
    Tan Yongtao
    Hao Jianli
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 20 (08) : 1060 - 1069
  • [7] Assessment of energy efficiency and sustainability scenarios in the transport system
    López E.
    Monzón A.
    Pfaffenbichler P.C.
    [J]. European Transport Research Review, 2012, 4 (1) : 47 - 56
  • [8] Wind energy expansion scenarios - A spatial sustainability assessment
    Eichhorn, Marcus
    Masurowski, Frank
    Becker, Raik
    Thraen, Daniela
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 180 : 367 - 375
  • [9] Sustainability assessment of development scenarios: methodology and application to Thailand
    Nijkamp, P
    Vreeker, R
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 33 (01) : 7 - 27
  • [10] Recent assessment of disinflation policy scenarios for Slovenia
    Bekö, J
    Festic, M
    [J]. EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2005, 53 (02): : 222 - 237