Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease

被引:7
|
作者
Zhao, Xue-Dong [1 ]
Zhao, Guan-Qi [1 ]
Wang, Xiao [1 ]
Shi, Shu-Tian [1 ]
Zheng, Wen [1 ]
Guo, Rui-Feng [1 ]
Nie, Shao-Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Inst Heart Lung & Blood Vessel Dis, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
Myocardial infarction; Multivessel disease; Non-culprit lesion; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Timing; DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; MULTI-VESSEL REVASCULARIZATION; GUIDELINE FOCUSED UPDATE; ARTERY-DISEASE; ACC/AHA GUIDELINE; CULPRIT LESION; STRATEGIES; DURATION; ANGIOPLASTY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.05.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Studies have shown that staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-culprit lesions is beneficial for prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease. However, the optimal timing of staged revascularization is still controversial. This study aimed to find the optimal timing of staged revascularization. Methods A total of 428 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI and staged PCI were included. According to the time interval between primary and staged PCI, patients were divided into three groups (<= 1 week, 1-2 weeks, and 2-12 weeks after primary PCI). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal re-infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke. Cox regression model was used to assess the association between staged PCI timing and risk of MACE. Results During the follow-up, 119 participants had MACEs. There was statistical difference in MACE incidence among the three groups (<= 1 week: 23.0%; 1-2 weeks: 33.0%; 2-12 weeks: 40.0%; P = 0.001). In the multivariable adjustment model, the timing interval of staged PCI <= 1 week and 1-2 weeks were both significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.24-0.65; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.93, respectively], mainly attributed to a lower risk of repeat revascularization (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.70; HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18-0.7), compared with a strategy of 2-12 weeks later of primary PCI. Conclusions The optimal timing of staged PCI for non-culprit vessels should be within two weeks after primary PCI for STEMI patients.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 362
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease
    Xue-Dong ZHAO
    Guan-Qi ZHAO
    Xiao WANG
    Shu-Tian SHI
    Wen ZHENG
    Rui-Feng GUO
    Shao-Ping NIE
    [J]. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2018, 15 (05) : 356 - 362
  • [2] Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease
    Xue-Dong ZHAO
    Guan-Qi ZHAO
    Xiao WANG
    Shu-Tian SHI
    Wen ZHENG
    Rui-Feng GUO
    Shao-Ping NIE
    [J]. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology., 2018, 15 (05) - 362
  • [3] TIMING OF STAGED PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION PATIENTS WITH MULTIVESSEL DISEASE
    Li Jianqiang
    Li Yue
    Zhao Jiyi
    Xue Jingyi
    Kong Yihui
    Guo Hong
    Li Weimin
    [J]. HEART, 2013, 99 : E177 - E178
  • [4] Optimal Timing of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Nonculprit Vessel in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease
    Kim, Inna
    Kim, Min Chul
    Jeong, Hae Chang
    Park, Keun Ho
    Sim, Doo Sun
    Hong, Young Joon
    Kim, Ju Han
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Cho, Jeong Gwan
    Park, Jong Chun
    Seung, Ki-Bae
    Chang, Kiyuk
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    [J]. KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2017, 47 (01) : 36 - 43
  • [5] Culprit Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Multivessel and Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Disease
    Hannan, Edward L.
    Samadashvili, Zaza
    Walford, Gary
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    Stamato, Nicholas J.
    Venditti, Ferdinand J.
    Sharma, Samin
    King, Spencer B., III
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (01) : 22 - 31
  • [6] Culprit Only or Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease
    Hougaard, Mikkel
    Jensen, Lisette O.
    Thayssen, Per
    Farkas, Dora K.
    Terkelsen, Christian J.
    Tilsted, Hans-Henrik
    Maeng, Michael
    Junker, Anders
    Lassen, Jens F.
    Hansen, Knud N.
    Puho, Erzsebet
    Sorensen, Henrik T.
    Thuesen, Leif
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (20) : B10 - B10
  • [7] Percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease
    Thomas, Michael P.
    Bates, Eric R.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 32 (06) : 755 - 760
  • [8] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Multivessel Disease and ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction When, Not Whether
    Applegate, Robert J.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (17) : 1777 - 1779
  • [9] Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease
    Cui, Kongyong
    Lyu, Shuzheng
    Song, Xiantao
    Liu, Hong
    Yuan, Fei
    Xu, Feng
    Zhang, Min
    Wang, Wei
    Zhang, Mingduo
    Zhang, Dongfeng
    Tian, Jinfan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 124 (03): : 334 - 342
  • [10] Optimal timing of delayed percutaneous coronary intervention in stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Zhao, Q.
    Xu, H.
    Lv, J.
    Zhao, Y.
    Yang, Y.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 2524 - 2524