First-trimester screening versus non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome at high-risk pregnant women in Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Vietnam: A cost-utility analysis

Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a relatively new technology for diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies in the context of a developing country like Vietnam. Currently, first-trimester screening (FTS) is more conventional in Vietnam. NIPT is assumed to be more accurate than other maternal screening but is also more costly. The purpose of the study was to perform a cost-utility analysis comparing the FTS and NIPT for Down syndrome for high-risk pregnant women (over 35-year-old) in Vietnam. Methods: Decision tree model and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used. Results: With the modelling population of 27,232 over 35 years of age pregnant women, FTS helps detect 218.5 cases of the fetus with Down syndrome compared with 247.2 cases when screening with NIPT. In addition, NIPT reduced 1384 false-positive cases compared to FTS. From a societal perspective, NIPT-dominated FTS. Compared to FTS, adopting an NIPT would cost an additional of USD 3,800 for each additional quality-adjusted life-year gained. Conclusions: NIPT is a cost-effective alternative to FTS for prenatal screening for Down syndrome with high-risk pregnant women. This is a very first attempt on cost-utility analysis of prenatal screening methods for Down syndrome in Vietnam and recommendations are made for future research to determine the most cost-effectiveness methods.