Fast simulators for satellite cloud optical centroid pressure retrievals; evaluation of OMI cloud retrievals

被引:39
|
作者
Joiner, J. [1 ]
Vasilkov, A. P. [2 ]
Gupta, P. [3 ,7 ]
Bhartia, P. K. [1 ]
Veefkind, P. [4 ]
Sneep, M. [4 ]
de Haan, J. [4 ]
Polonsky, I. [5 ]
Spurr, R. [6 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Atmospheres Lab, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] Sci Syst & Applicat Inc, Lanham, MD USA
[3] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
[4] Royal Dutch Meteorol Inst KNMI, De Bilt, Netherlands
[5] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[6] RTSolutions Inc, Cambridge, MA USA
[7] Univ Space Res Assoc, Columbia, MD USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
OZONE MONITORING EXPERIMENT; RADIATIVE-TRANSFER; RAMAN-SCATTERING; COLUMN RETRIEVAL; SOLAR-RADIATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; TOP PRESSURE; OXYGEN; GOME; BAND;
D O I
10.5194/amt-5-529-2012
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The cloud Optical Centroid Pressure (OCP) is a satellite-derived parameter that is commonly used in trace-gas retrievals to account for the effects of clouds on near-infrared through ultraviolet radiance measurements. Fast simulators are desirable to further expand the use of cloud OCP retrievals into the operational and climate communities for applications such as data assimilation and evaluation of cloud vertical structure in general circulation models. In this paper, we develop and validate fast simulators that provide estimates of the cloud OCP given a vertical profile of optical extinction. We use a pressure-weighting scheme where the weights depend upon optical parameters of clouds and/or aerosols. A cloud weighting function is easily extracted using this formulation. We then use fast simulators to compare two different satellite cloud OCP retrievals, from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), with estimates based on collocated cloud extinction profiles from a combination of CloudSat radar and MODIS visible radiance data. These comparisons are made over a wide range of conditions to provide a comprehensive validation of the OMI cloud OCP retrievals. We find generally good agreement between OMI cloud OCPs and those predicted by CloudSat. However, the OMI cloud OCPs from the two independent algorithms agree better with each other than either does with the estimates from CloudSat/MODIS. Differences between OMI cloud OCPs and those based on CloudSat/MODIS may result from undetected snow/ice at the surface, cloud 3-D effects, cases of low clouds obscurred by ground-clutter in CloudSat observations and by opaque high clouds in CALIPSO lidar observations, and the fact that CloudSat/CALIPSO only observes a relatively small fraction of an OMI field-of-view.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 545
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementation of cloud retrievals for TES atmospheric retrievals: 2. Characterization of cloud top pressure and effective optical depth retrievals
    Eldering, Annmarie
    Kulawik, Susan S.
    Worden, John
    Bowman, Kevin
    Osterman, Greg
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2008, 113 (D16)
  • [2] The sensitivity of ice cloud optical and microphysical passive satellite retrievals to cloud geometrical thickness
    Hong, Gang
    Yang, Ping
    Huang, Hung-Lung
    Baum, Bryan A.
    Hu, Yongxiang
    Platnick, Steven
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2007, 45 (05): : 1315 - 1323
  • [3] Fast cloud parameter retrievals of MIPAS/Envisat
    Spang, R.
    Arndt, K.
    Dudhia, A.
    Hoepfner, M.
    Hoffmann, L.
    Hurley, J.
    Grainger, R. G.
    Griessbach, S.
    Poulsen, C.
    Remedios, J. J.
    Riese, M.
    Sembhi, H.
    Siddans, R.
    Waterfall, A.
    Zehner, C.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (15) : 7135 - 7164
  • [4] Quantifying the Dependence of Satellite Cloud Retrievals on Instrument Uncertainty
    Shea, Yolanda L.
    Wielicki, Bruce A.
    Sun-Mack, Sunny
    Minnis, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2017, 30 (17) : 6959 - 6976
  • [5] Exploiting the sensitivity of two satellite cloud height retrievals to cloud vertical distribution
    Henken, C. K. Carbajal
    Doppler, L.
    Lindstrot, R.
    Preusker, R.
    Fischer, J.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2015, 8 (08) : 3419 - 3431
  • [6] Broken and inhomogeneous cloud impact on satellite cloud particle effective radius and cloud-phase retrievals
    Wolters, Erwin L. A.
    Deneke, Hartwig M.
    van den Hurk, Bart J. J. M.
    Meirink, Jan Fokke
    Roebeling, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2010, 115
  • [7] Cloud retrievals from satellite data using optimal estimation: evaluation and application to ATSR
    Poulsen, C. A.
    Siddans, R.
    Thomas, G. E.
    Sayer, A. M.
    Grainger, R. G.
    Campmany, E.
    Dean, S. M.
    Arnold, C.
    Watts, P. D.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2012, 5 (08) : 1889 - 1910
  • [8] The effects of scattering angle and cumulus cloud geometry on satellite retrievals of cloud droplet effective radius
    Vant-Hull, Brian
    Marshak, Alexander
    Remer, Lorraine A.
    Li, Zhanqing
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2007, 45 (04): : 1039 - 1045
  • [9] Correction of Rayleigh scattering effects in cloud optical thickness retrievals
    Wang, MH
    King, MD
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D22) : 25915 - 25926
  • [10] Improving Satellite-Based Convective Cloud Growth Monitoring with Visible Optical Depth Retrievals
    Sieglaff, Justin M.
    Cronce, Lee M.
    Feltz, Wayne F.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2014, 53 (02) : 506 - 520