Screening and Follow-Up of Living Kidney Donors: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines

被引:80
|
作者
Tong, Allison [1 ,2 ]
Chapman, Jeremy R. [3 ]
Wong, Germaine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Bruijn, Jeanine [1 ,4 ]
Craig, Jonathan C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Ctr Kidney Res, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Westmead Hosp, Ctr Transplant & Renal Res, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Social & Behav Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Living donor; Clinical practice guidelines; Kidney transplantation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TRANSPLANTATION; HEALTH; METAANALYSIS; AGREEMENT; APPRAISAL; FRAMEWORK; DONATION; KAPPA;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3182328276
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
To minimize the health risks faced by living kidney donors, multiple clinical practice guidelines have been developed on the assessment and care of potential donors. This study aims to compare the quality, scope, and consistency of these guidelines. We searched for guidelines on living kidney donation in electronic databases, guideline registries, and relevant Web sites to February 21, 2011. Methodological quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Education (AGREE) instrument. Textual synthesis was used to compare guideline recommendations. Ten guidelines, published from 1996 to 2010, were identified. Although generally comprehensive, scope varied considerably and mostly appeared to lack methodological rigor. Many recommendations were consistent, but important differences were evident, particularly for thresholds for comorbidities which precluded donation; obesity/overweight (body mass index, 30-35 kg/m(2)), diabetes/prediabetes (fasting blood glucose level, 6.1-7.0 mmol/L and oral glucose tolerance test, 7.8-11.1 mmol/L), hypertension (130/85 to 140/90 mm Hg), cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and nephrolithiasis. The importance of informed voluntary consent, genuine motivation, support, and psychological health were recognized but difficult to implement as specific tools for conducting psychosocial assessments were not recommended. Multiple major guidelines for living kidney donation have been published recently, resulting in unnecessary duplicative efforts. Most do not meet standard processes for development, and important recommendations about thresholds for exclusion based on comorbidities are contradictory. There is an urgent need for international collaboration and coordination to ensure, where possible, that guidelines for living donation are consistent, evidence based, and comprehensive to promote best outcomes for a precious resource.
引用
收藏
页码:962 / 972
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening and Follow Up of Living Kidney Donors: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    Tong, A.
    Chapman, J.
    Wong, G.
    de Bruijn, J.
    Craig, J. C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 : 507 - 507
  • [2] Current Practice in Psychosocial Evaluation and Follow-Up of Living Kidney Donors
    Clifton, E.
    Winder, G.
    Bakhai, D.
    Yadav, A.
    Zimbrean, P.
    Liapakis, A.
    Lentine, K.
    Andacoglu, O.
    Deng, Y.
    Holmes, R.
    Jaber, L.
    Jackson, W.
    Joyce, M.
    Emamaullee, J.
    Kalil, R.
    Kumar, V.
    Laflen, J.
    Prashar, R.
    Rubman, S.
    Doshi, M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (06) : S1096 - S1096
  • [3] Follow-up of patients with keratinocyte carcinoma: systematic review of clinical practice guidelines
    Mirali, Sara
    Tang, Evan
    Drucker, Aaron
    Beecker, Jennifer
    Bissonnette, Robert
    Catherall, Helen
    Gooderham, Melinda
    Hawkins, Nicole
    Hong, Chih-Ho
    Levell, Nick
    McKenzie, Jo-Ann Lapointe
    Papp, Kim
    Turchin, Irina
    Chan, An-Wen
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 187 : 170 - 170
  • [4] Follow-up of Patients With Keratinocyte Carcinoma A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Mirali, Sara
    Tang, Evan
    Drucker, Aaron M.
    Turchin, Irina
    Gooderham, Melinda
    Levell, Nick
    Beecker, Jennifer
    Bissonnette, Robert
    Catherall, Helen
    Mckenzie, Jo-Ann Lapointe
    Hawkins, Nicole
    Hong, Chih-Ho
    Kalia, Sunil
    Papp, Kim
    Chan, An-Wen
    [J]. JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 159 (01) : 87 - 94
  • [5] Evaluation and follow-up of living kidney donors
    Giessing, M
    Schönberger, B
    Fritsche, L
    Budde, K
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2004, 129 (04) : 147 - 150
  • [6] Retrospective follow-up of living kidney donors
    Jehan, S
    Benalia, H
    Mouquet, C
    Bitker, MO
    [J]. PRESSE MEDICALE, 1998, 27 (33): : 1680 - 1680
  • [7] A Systematic Review of Different Countries' Clinical Practice Guidelines for Screening and Follow-Up of Individuals at High Risk of Melanoma
    Watts, C.
    Dieng, M.
    Morton, R.
    Mann, G.
    Menzies, S.
    Cust, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2013, 11 : 10 - 11
  • [8] Are American follow-up recommendations in endocrinology actionable? A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines
    Francisco J. Barrera
    Karina Raygoza-Cortez
    Mariana García-Leal
    Juan P. Brito
    Naykky M. Singh Ospina
    René Rodríguez-Gutiérrez
    [J]. Endocrine, 2021, 72 : 375 - 384
  • [9] Are American follow-up recommendations in endocrinology actionable? A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines
    Barrera, Francisco J.
    Raygoza-Cortez, Karina
    Garcia-Leal, Mariana
    Brito, Juan P.
    Ospina, Naykky M. Singh
    Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2021, 72 (02) : 375 - 384
  • [10] Clinical practice guidelines for identification, screening and follow-up of individuals at high risk of primary cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review
    Watts, C. G.
    Dieng, M.
    Morton, R. L.
    Mann, G. J.
    Menzies, S. W.
    Cust, A. E.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 172 (01) : 33 - 47