Strengthening health technology assessment systems in the global south: a comparative analysis of the HTA journeys of China, India and South Africa

被引:41
|
作者
MacQuilkan, Kim [1 ]
Baker, Peter [2 ]
Downey, Laura [2 ]
Ruiz, Francis [2 ]
Chalkidou, Kalipso [2 ]
Prinja, Shankar [3 ]
Zhao, Kun [4 ]
Wilkinson, Thomas [1 ]
Glassman, Amanda [5 ]
Hofman, Karen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Publ Hlth, Fac Hlth Sci, Prior Cost Effect Lessons Syst Strengthening Sout, Room 231,27 St Andrews Rd, ZA-2193 Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Imperial Coll London, Inst Global Hlth Innovat, Global Hlth & Dev Grp, London, England
[3] PGIMER, Sch Publ Hlth, Chandigarh, India
[4] Minist Hlth, China Natl Hlth Dev Res Ctr CHNHDR, Div Hlth Technol Assessment & Policy Evaluat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Ctr Global Dev, Washington, DC USA
来源
GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION | 2018年 / 11卷 / 01期
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Capacity building; south-south collaboration; LMICs; priority-setting; HTA; MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES; INSURANCE COVERAGE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; PRIORITY; CHALLENGES; CONTEXT; ASIA;
D O I
10.1080/16549716.2018.1527556
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Resource allocation in health is universally challenging, but especially so in resource-constrained contexts in the Global South. Pursuing a strategy of evidence-based decision-making and using tools such as Health Technology Assessment (HTA), can help address issues relating to both affordability and equity when allocating resources. Three BRICS and Global South countries, China, India and South Africa have committed to strengthening HTA capacity and developing their domestic HTA systems, with the goal of getting evidence translated into policy. Through assessing and comparing the HTA journey of each country it may be possible to identify common problems and shareable insights. Objectives: This collaborative paper aimed to share knowledge on strengthening HTA systems to enable enhanced evidence-based decision-making in the Global South by: Identifying common barriers and enablers in three BRICS countries in the Global South; and Exploring how South-South collaboration can strengthen HTA capacity and utilisation for better healthcare decision-making. Methods: A descriptive and explorative comparative analysis was conducted comprising a Within-Case analysis to produce a narrative of the HTA journey in each country and an AcrossCase analysis to explore both knowledge that could be shared and any potential knowledge gaps. Results: Analyses revealed that China, India and South Africa share many barriers to strengthening and developing HTA systems such as: (1) Minimal HTA expertise; (2) Weak health data infrastructure; (3) Rising healthcare costs; (4) Fragmented healthcare systems; and (5) Significant growth in non-communicable diseases. Stakeholder engagement and institutionalisation of HTA were identified as two conducive factors for strengthening HTA systems. Conclusion: China, India and South Africa have all committed to establishing robust HTA systems to inform evidence-based priority setting and have experienced similar challenges. Engagement among countries of the Global South can provide a supportive platform to share knowledge that is more applicable and pragmatic.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Law and Social Policy in the Global South: Brazil, China, India, South Africa
    Le Bail, Marie
    Chen, Davy
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2024, 26 (01) : 87 - 89
  • [2] A health systems strengthening approach to malaria control in South Africa
    Makubalo, L. E.
    Mahlasela, L.
    [J]. ACTA TROPICA, 2005, 95 : S75 - S75
  • [3] South-South Cooperation and global development in a multipolar world: China and India in Africa
    Banik, Dan
    Mawdsley, Emma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 35 (04) : 539 - 548
  • [4] Health technology assessment in South Africa - future promise
    Mueller, Debjani B.
    Govender, Moreshnee
    Basu, Debashis
    [J]. SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 101 (05): : 286 - 287
  • [5] Health technology assessment - a new initiative in South Africa
    Govender, Moreshnee
    Letshokgohla, Motlatso Elias
    Basu, Debashis
    [J]. SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 100 (06): : 334 - 334
  • [6] Evaluation of the impact of access to electricity: A comparative analysis of South Africa, China, India and Brazil
    Pereira, Marico Giannini
    Sena, Jose Antonio
    Vasconcelos Freitas, Marcos Aurelio
    da Silva, Neilton Fidelis
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (03): : 1427 - 1441
  • [7] Landscape analysis of health technology assessment (HTA): systems and practices in Asia
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    Rattanavipapong, Waranya
    Lin, Lydia Wenxin
    Dabak, Saudamini Vishwanath
    Gibbons, Brent
    Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
    Toh, Kai Yee
    Cher, Boon Piang
    Pearce, Fiona
    Bayani, Diana Beatriz S.
    Nakamura, Ryota
    Pwu, Raoh-Fang
    Shafie, Asrul Akmal
    Adhikari, Deepika
    Prinja, Shankar
    Babidge, Wendy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 35 (06) : 416 - 421
  • [8] Key Players in Global Health: How Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa Are Influencing the Game
    Cha, V.
    [J]. VESTNIK MEZHDUNARODNYKH ORGANIZATSII-INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2011, 6 (04): : 135 - 137
  • [9] A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE SYSTEMS IN UNITED STATES, SOUTH AFRICA AND TURKEY
    Seyhun, O.
    Can, H.
    Erdol, S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A20 - A20
  • [10] An assessment of progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS)
    Marten, Robert
    McIntyre, Diane
    Travassos, Claudia
    Shishkin, Sergey
    Longde, Wang
    Reddy, Srinath
    Vega, Jeanette
    [J]. LANCET, 2014, 384 (9960): : 2164 - 2171