Measurement of surface dose in an MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for IMRT beam geometries

被引:9
|
作者
Lim-Reinders, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Keller, Brian M. [1 ,3 ]
Sahgal, Arjun [1 ,3 ]
Chugh, Brige [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Anthony [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Odette Canc Ctr, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Med Sci Bldg,1 Kings Coll Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fac Med, 149 Coll St,Suite 504, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
关键词
electron return effect; hypofractionated partial breast irradiation; magnetic dose effects; MR-Linac; MRIgRT; optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters; surface dose; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MONTE-CARLO; CALCULATION ALGORITHM; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPACT; FEASIBILITY; ACCELERATOR; THERAPY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1002/mp.14185
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aims to measure the surface dose on an anthropomorphic phantom for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans treated in a 1.5 T magnetic resonance (MR)-Linac. Previous studies have used Monte Carlo programs to simulate surface dose and have recognized high surface dose as a potential limiting factor for the MR-Linac; however, to our knowledge surface dose measurement for clinical plans has not yet been published. Given the novelty of the MR-Linac, it is important to perform in vivo measurements of a potentially dose-limiting factor such as surface dose when moving forward for clinical use. Methods Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were used on an anthropomorphic phantom. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans were generated to treat a near-surface breast tumor in the phantom. The tumor was treated with 2, 3, 5, 7, and 9 beam IMRT plans with a 1.5 T MR-Linac using a 7-MV photon beam. The plans were generated in a Monte Carlo treatment planning system (TPS) capable of modeling magnetic field effects. The surface dose was sampled in seven locations on the surface surrounding the planning target volume (PTV), and in two different OSLD configurations with the dosimeters measuring water equivalent depths of 0.16 and 0.64 mm. The TPS was used to estimate the doses at the OSLD locations. In addition, MR images were taken of a pork belly with and without an OSLD placed anteriorly placed to determine the effect of an OSLD on image fidelity. Results For the 3, 5, 7, and 9-beam configurations, surface doses were approximately half that of the prescription dose to the simulated tumor, although the magnitude of the skin dose relative to the prescription is certainly also dependent on individual patient anatomy. The general trend for both TPS and measurements was that the greater the number of beams, the lower the skin doses and dose readings; also, with increasing numbers of beams, doses at shallow depths become lower relative to deeper depths. The MR images showed that the presence of the OSLD did not induce clinically relevant geometric distortions or intensity differences. Conclusions To our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to experimentally measure the surface dose in an MR-Linac for IMRT plans. This study has explored the use of OSLDs to measure in vivo surface dose in a clinical setting. OSLDs may be used to measure skin dose clinically when there are concerns of skin radiation burns and near-surface toxicity. Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters are promising devices for in vivo surface dosimetry in an MR-Linac.
引用
收藏
页码:3133 / 3142
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surface and near-surface dose measurements at beam entry and exit in a 1.5 T MR-Linac using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters
    Kim, Anthony
    Lim-Reinders, Stephanie
    Ahmad, Syed Bilal
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Keller, Brian M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (04):
  • [2] Out-of-field dose assessment for a 1.5 T MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters
    Zhang, Yan
    Yan, Shaojie
    Cui, Zhen
    Wang, Yungang
    Li, Zhenjiang
    Yin, Yong
    Li, Baosheng
    Quan, Hong
    Zhu, Jian
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (07) : 4027 - 4037
  • [3] Skin Dose Comparison Between a 1.5 T MR-Linac and a Conventional Linac Using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters for Patients with Intracranial Tumors
    Kim, A.
    Mccann, C.
    Ruschin, M.
    Tseng, C.
    Sahgal, A.
    Keller, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E660 - E660
  • [4] Use of Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters, OSLDs, for an Independent Verification of Dose Delivered by IMRT Treatments
    Sharma, R.
    Jursinic, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [5] Measurement of radiation dose with BeO dosimeters using optically stimulated luminescence technique in radiotherapy
    Sahin, Serdar
    Tanir, A. Gunes
    Meric, Niyazi
    Aydinkarahaliloglu, Ercan
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2015, 103 : 31 - 36
  • [6] Patient Surface Dose Measurements Using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters in Scanning Proton Beam Therapy for Breast Cancer
    Yu, J.
    Strauss, D.
    Langner, U.
    Langen, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3501 - 3501
  • [7] Dose Effect of Transverse Magnetic Field on IMRT Plans Delivered in an MR-Linac
    Chen, X.
    Prior, P.
    Schultz, C. J.
    Li, X. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S98 - S98
  • [8] Measurement of Dose at Interfaces Using a Heterogeneous Phantom in a MR-Linac
    Ahmad, S.
    Paudel, M.
    Sahgal, A.
    Sarfehnia, A.
    Keller, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E551 - E551
  • [9] The measurement of entrance surface dose using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for determining average glandular dose in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurement and simulation study
    Chusin, Thunyarat
    Yabsantia, Sumalee
    Matsubara, Kosuke
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (01):
  • [10] Evaluation of Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters as An In-Vivo Dosimeter for Breast Surface Dose Measurement
    Harrop, S.
    Cao, F.
    Kohli, K.
    Harvey, E.
    Dubrowski, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)