Good implant survival after acetabular revision with extensive impaction bone grafting and uncemented components

被引:13
|
作者
Perlbach, R. [1 ,2 ]
Palm, L. [1 ,2 ]
Mohaddes, M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Ivarsson, I. [1 ,2 ]
Schilcher, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Orthoped Surg, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Orthoped, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Registerctr VGR, Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2020年 / 102B卷 / 02期
关键词
HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; ALLOGRAFT; RECONSTRUCTION; MIGRATION; FAILURE; PROSTHESES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0584.R2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims This single-centre observational study aimed to describe the results of extensive bone impaction grafting of the whole acetabular cavity in combination with an uncemented component in acetabular revisions performed in a standardized manner since 1993. Methods Between 1993 and 2013, 370 patients with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range (IQR) 63 to 79 years) underwent acetabular revision surgery. Of these, 229 were more than ten years following surgery and 137 were more than 15 years. All revisions were performed with extensive use of morcellized allograft firmly impacted into the entire acetabular cavity, followed by insertion of an uncemented component with supplementary screw fixation. All types of reoperation were captured using review of radiographs and medical charts, combined with data from the local surgical register and the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Results Among patients with possible follow-up of ten and 15 years, 152 and 72 patients remained alive without revision of the acetabular component. The number of deaths was 61 and 50, respectively. Of those who died, six patients in each group had a reoperation performed before death. The number of patients with a reoperation was 22 for those with ten-year follow-up and 21 for those with 15 years of follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier implant survival rate for aseptic loosening among all 370 patients in the cohort was 96.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.1 to 98.5) after ten years and 92.8% (95% CI 89.2 to 96.6) after 15 years. Conclusion Extensive bone impaction grafting combined with uncemented revision components appears to be a reliable method with favourable long-term survival. This technique offers the advantage of bone stock restoration and disputes the long-standing perception that uncemented components require > 50% of host bone contact for successful implant survival.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 204
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impaction grafting for acetabular revision: Bringing back the bone
    Argenson, JN
    Paratte, S
    Flecher, X
    Aubaniac, JM
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2004, 27 (09) : 967 - 968
  • [2] Uncemented Cups and Impaction Bone Grafting for Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes
    D'Apolito, Rocco
    Zagra, Luigi
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (10)
  • [3] Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup
    Buttaro, Martin A.
    Comba, Fernando
    Pusso, Rodolfo
    Piccaluga, Francisco
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 466 (10) : 2482 - 2490
  • [4] The biological approach in acetabular revision surgery: impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup
    Colo, Ena
    Rijnen, Wim H. C.
    Schreurs, Berend Willem
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 25 (04) : 361 - 367
  • [5] Acetabular revision in THA using tantalum augments combined with impaction bone grafting
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Bangert, Yannic
    Schwantes, Bernd
    Gebauer, Matthias
    Kendoff, Daniel
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 23 (04) : 359 - 365
  • [6] Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture
    Eelco Bronsema
    Martijn A. J. te Stroet
    Maartje Zengerink
    Albert van Kampen
    B. Willem Schreurs
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 2441 - 2446
  • [7] Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture
    Bronsema, Eelco
    te Stroet, Martijn A. J.
    Zengerink, Maartje
    van Kampen, Albert
    Schreurs, B. Willem
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (12) : 2441 - 2446
  • [8] Favorable survival of acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting in dysplastic hips
    Somford, Matthijs P.
    Bolder, Stefan B. T.
    Gardeniers, Jean W. M.
    Slooff, Tom J. J. H.
    Schreurs, B. Willem
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 466 (02) : 359 - 365
  • [9] Uncemented Cups and Impaction Bone Grafting for Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes (vol 15, 3728, 2022)
    D'Apolito, Rocco
    Zagra, Luigi
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (16)
  • [10] Impaction grafting and acetabular reinforcement in revision hip replacement
    Pitto, RP
    Di Muria, GV
    Hohmann, D
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1998, 22 (03) : 161 - 164