Qualitative and quantitative detection of CNS in meat products via GC/MS and GFAP ELISA-comparison of methods

被引:1
|
作者
Griessbach, Maria [1 ]
Baumann, Daniela [2 ]
Biedermann, Wolfgang [2 ]
Krex, Christian [1 ]
Kunath, Oliver [1 ]
Truyen, Uwe [2 ]
Luecker, Ernst [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Inst Lebensmittelhyg, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Tierhyg & Offentliches Vetinarwesen, Leipzig, Germany
来源
ARCHIV FUR LEBENSMITTELHYGIENE | 2007年 / 58卷 / 06期
关键词
BSE; CNS detection; FAME; GFAP; comparison of methods;
D O I
10.2377/0003-925X-58-208
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
To protect the consumer from the pathogenic agent of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE), the regulation 999/2001 defines specified risk materials (SRM), which must be removed from feedstuff and the food chain. Especially, tissues of the central nervous system (CNS), originating from cattle, sheep and goat, over the age of 12 months, are counted as SRM. In this study, two methods for CNS detection were compared regarding to the quality of CNS detection. The detection of Glial Fibrillary Acid Protein (GFAP) by means of an ELISA and the analysis of CNS typical fatty acids (FA) by means of Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) were developed at the Institute of Food Hygiene, Both methods were examined for the quality of CNS detection. As parameters for the validation intermediate precision, accuracy and recovery were chosen. For this study, internal and external reference materials with three different heating steps (85 degrees C, 115 degrees C and 133 degrees C) were analysed. Both methods correctly identified all CNS-negative samples. False positive results were not detected. Based on the actual state of law, a categorisation of SRM was carried out by the GC-MS method. All SRM positive samples could be identified correctly. Intermediate precision of both methods was comparable to previously published data of CNS detection methods based on GFAP-ELISA (Schmidt et al., 2001; Hossner et al., 2006; Schebo(R) Biotech, 2007). Accuracy of both methods was given in samples heated up to 35 degrees C. Only the analysis of FA was in a position to detect the true CNS content in samples heated up to 115 'C and 133 'C. Recovery of the GFAP-ELISA ranged from 0 to 83.8%, whereas the recovery of the GC/MS was good (74.9-86.4%).
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 213
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative detection of horse contamination in cooked meat products by ELISA
    Samadpour, Mansour (ms@iehinc.com), 1600, AOAC International (101):
  • [2] Quantitative Detection of Beef Contamination in Cooked Meat Products by ELISA
    Thienes, Cortlandt P.
    Masiri, Jongkit
    Benoit, Lora A.
    Barrios-Lopez, Brianda
    Samuel, Santosh A.
    Krebs, Richard A.
    Cox, David P.
    Dobritsa, Anatoly P.
    Nadala, Cesar
    Samadpour, Mansour
    JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 102 (03) : 898 - 902
  • [3] Quantitative Detection of Pork Contamination in Cooked Meat Products by ELISA
    Thienes, Cortlandt P.
    Masiri, Jongkit
    Benoit, Lora A.
    Barrios-Lopez, Brianda
    Samuel, Santosh A.
    Cox, David P.
    Dobritsa, Anatoly P.
    Nadala, Cesar
    Samadpour, Mansour
    JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 101 (03) : 810 - 816
  • [4] Quantitative Detection of Horse Contamination in Cooked Meat Products by ELISA
    Thienes, Cortlandt P.
    Masiri, Jongkit
    Benoit, Lora A.
    Barrios-Lopez, Brianda
    Samuel, Santosh A.
    Cox, David P.
    Dobritsa, Anatoly P.
    Nadala, Cesar
    Samadpour, Mansour
    JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 101 (03) : 817 - 823
  • [5] Comparison of immunofluorescence method with histochemical and ELISA methods focusing on wheat protein detection in meat products
    Petrasova, Michaela
    Pospiech, Matej
    Tremlova, Bohuslava
    Tauferova, Alexandra
    Marcincak, Slavomir
    FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 28 (06) : 1094 - 1104
  • [6] QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DETECTION OF EGG-WHITE IN HEAT-TREATED MEAT-PRODUCTS BY MEANS OF ELISA
    RING, C
    MANZ, J
    WINDISCH, M
    ARCHIV FUR LEBENSMITTELHYGIENE, 1990, 41 (03): : 69 - 70
  • [7] Quantitative Detection of Chicken and Turkey Contamination in Cooked Meat Products by ELISA
    Thienes, Cortlandt P.
    Masiri, Jongkit
    Benoit, Lora A.
    Barrios-Lopez, Brianda
    Samuel, Santosh A.
    Meshgi, Mahzad A.
    Cox, David P.
    Dobritsa, Anatoly P.
    Nadala, Cesar
    Samadpour, Mansour
    JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 102 (02) : 557 - 563
  • [8] Real Time Detection of Aroma Compounds in Meat and Meat Products by SIFT-MS and Comparison to Conventional Techniques (SPME-GC-MS)
    Flores, Monica
    Olivares, Alicia
    Dryahina, Kseniya
    Spanel, Patrik
    CURRENT ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 9 (04) : 622 - 630
  • [9] Comparison of new immunofluorescence method for detection of soy protein in meat products with immunohistochemical, histochemical, and ELISA methods
    Petrasova, Michaela
    Pospiech, Matej
    Lukaskova, Zuzana Rezacova
    Tremlova, Bohuslava
    ACTA VETERINARIA BRNO, 2014, 83 : S65 - S69
  • [10] Quantitative Comparison of Trace Organonitrate Explosives Detection by GC-MS and GC-ECD2 Methods with Emphasis on Sensitivity
    Gregory, Kerin E.
    Kunz, Roderick R.
    Hardy, Dennis E.
    Fountain, Augustus Way, III
    Ostazeski, Stanley A.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC SCIENCE, 2011, 49 (01) : 1 - 7