共 50 条
A systematic review of automated feeder detection software for locoregional treatment of hepatic tumors
被引:24
|作者:
Cui, Z.
[1
]
Shukla, P. A.
[2
]
Habibollahi, P.
[3
]
Park, H. S.
[3
]
Fischman, A.
[4
]
Kolber, M. K.
[3
]
机构:
[1] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Div Intervent Radiol, Dept Radiol, MSB F-506, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiol, Div Vasc & Intervent Radiol, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, Div Vasc & Intervent Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词:
Cone-beam computed tomography;
Liver neoplasm;
Automated feeder detection;
Angiography;
Digital subtraction;
CONE-BEAM CT;
TRANSCATHETER ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION;
VESSEL-DETECTION SOFTWARE;
CONVENTIONAL TRANSARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION;
SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA;
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY;
FEEDING VESSELS;
EMBOLIZATION;
IDENTIFICATION;
ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.011
中图分类号:
R8 [特种医学];
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100207 ;
1009 ;
摘要:
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of current literature describing the efficacy and technical outcomes of transarterial liver therapies using automated feeder detection (AFD) software. Materials and methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A structured search was performed in the PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase databases of patients undergoing locoregional therapy of liver tumors utilizing AFD software. Demographic data, procedure data (including radiometrics) and tumor response rate were recorded. Where available, performance of AFD was compared to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) without AFD. Results: A total of 14 full-text manuscripts met inclusion criteria, comprising 1042 tumors in 604 patients (305 men, 156 women; mean age, 68.6 +/- 6.0 [SD] years), including 537 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 8 with metastases from neuroendocrine tumors, and 59 patients without reported etiology. Reported sensitivity of AFD ranged between 86% and 98.5%, compared to DSA alone (38% - 64%) or DSA in combination with CBCT (69% - 81%). Three studies reported tumor response by modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) guidelines, with complete response in the range of 60% - 69%. Conclusion: AFD is a promising new technology for the identification of intrahepatic and extrahepatic tumor-feeding arteries and should be considered a useful adjunct to conventional DSAand CBCT in the treatment of liver tumors. (c) 2020 Societe francaise de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:439 / 449
页数:11
相关论文