Use of landscape-level river signatures in conservation planning: a South African case study

被引:0
|
作者
Roux, D [1 ]
de Moor, F
Cambray, J
Barber-James, H
机构
[1] CSIR, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Albany Museum, Grahamstown, South Africa
来源
CONSERVATION ECOLOGY | 2002年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A strategy for assigning priorities in biodiversity conservation was developed for the rivers of the proposed Greater Addo Elephant National Park (GAENP) in South Africa. Due to the limited availability of biological information on the freshwater ecosystems of this area, a desktop approach, supplemented by aerial and land surveys, was used to devise a new river classification typology. This typology incorporated landscape attributes as surrogates for biodiversity patterns, resulting in defined physical "signatures" for each river type. Riverine biodiversity is considered to be conserved by including rivers of each type as defined by the respective signatures. Where options existed, and two or more rivers shared the same signature, a simple procedure was used to assign priorities to "similar" rivers for conservation. This procedure considered the extent of transformation, degree of inclusion within the park, irreplaceability or uniqueness, and geomorphological diversity of each river. The outcome of the study was that 18 of the 31 rivers within the GAENP must be conserved to achieve representation of all of the biodiversity patterns identified. It is concluded that, given further development and testing, the river signature concept holds promise for elevating the river focus in general conservation planning exercises.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combining Landscape-Level Conservation Planning and Biodiversity Offset Programs: A Case Study
    Jared G. Underwood
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2011, 47 : 121 - 129
  • [2] Combining Landscape-Level Conservation Planning and Biodiversity Offset Programs: A Case Study
    Underwood, Jared G.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 47 (01) : 121 - 129
  • [3] Landscape-level thresholds and newt conservation
    Denoel, Mathieu
    Ficetola, G. Francesco
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (01) : 302 - 309
  • [4] Landscape-level naturalness of conservation easements in a mixed-use matrix
    Nakisha Fouch
    Robert F. Baldwin
    Patrick Gerard
    Caitlin Dyckman
    David M. Theobald
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34 : 1967 - 1987
  • [5] Landscape-level naturalness of conservation easements in a mixed-use matrix
    Fouch, Nakisha
    Baldwin, Robert F.
    Gerard, Patrick
    Dyckman, Caitlin
    Theobald, David M.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2019, 34 (08) : 1967 - 1987
  • [6] Planning for Implementation: Landscape-Level Restoration Planning in an Agricultural Setting
    Thompson, Bill A.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2011, 19 (01) : 5 - 13
  • [7] Simulating the impact of landscape-level biodiversity guidelines: A case study
    Andison, David W.
    Marshall, Peter L.
    [J]. Forestry Chronicle, 75 (04): : 655 - 665
  • [8] Simulating the impact of landscape-level biodiversity guidelines: A case study
    Andison, DW
    Marshall, PL
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 1999, 75 (04): : 655 - 665
  • [9] Incorporating Archaeological Resources in Landscape-Level Planning and Management
    Doelle, William H.
    Barker, Pat
    Cushman, David
    Heilen, Michael
    Herhahn, Cynthia
    Rieth, Christina
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 4 (02): : 118 - 131
  • [10] Identifying and prioritizing ungulate migration routes for landscape-level conservation
    Sawyer, Hall
    Kauffman, Matthew J.
    Nielson, Ryan M.
    Horne, Jon S.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2009, 19 (08) : 2016 - 2025