Enhancing integrated palliative care: what models are appropriate? A cross-case analysis

被引:21
|
作者
Payne, Sheila [1 ]
Eastham, Rachael [2 ]
Hughes, Sean [1 ]
Varey, Sandra [2 ]
Hasselaar, Jeroen [3 ]
Preston, Nancy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Div Hlth Res, Int Observ End Life Care, Lancaster LA1 4YG, England
[2] Univ Lancaster, Div Hlth Res, Lancaster LA1 4YG, England
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Anaesthesiol Pain & Palliat Med, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE | 2017年 / 16卷
关键词
Integrated care; Palliative care; Qualitative research; End-of-life care; Physician-patient relations; Continuity of care; Hospice; Advanced disease; Delivery of health care; Primary health care; SUPPORT; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-017-0250-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Effective integration between hospices, palliative care services and other local health care services to support patients with palliative care needs is an important international priority. A previous model suggests that integration involves a cumulative stepped process of engagement with other organisations labelled as 'support, supplant or supplement', but the extent to which this model currently applies in the United Kingdom is unknown. We aimed to investigate accounts of hospice integration with local health care providers, using the framework provided by the model, to determine how service users and healthcare professionals perceived palliative care services and the extent of integration experienced. Methods: Longitudinal organisational case study methods were employed using qualitative serial interviews (interval 3 months) with patients and family carers focusing on how services responded to their needs; and group interviews with health professionals. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed by qualitative content analysis and combined across data sources. Results: The study focused on four hospices in northern England, including 34 patients (diagnosis: 17 cancer, 10 COPD, 7 heart failure), 65% female, mean age 66 (range 44-89), 13 family carers of these patients (48% partners), and 23 health care professionals. While some care fell short of expectations, all patients reported high levels of satisfaction and valued continuity of care and efficient information sharing. All hospices supported and supplemented local providers, with three hospices also supplanting local provision by providing in-patient facilities. Conclusion: UK hospices predominantly operate in ways that support and supplement other providers. In addition, some also supplant local services, taking over direct responsibility and funding in-patient care. They all contributed to integration with local services, with greater blurring of boundaries than defined by the original model. Integrated care offers the necessary flexibility to respond to changes in patient needs, however, constraints from funding drivers and a lack of clear responsibilities in the UK can result in shortfalls in optimal service delivery. Integrating hospice care with local healthcare services can help to address demographic changes, predominantly more frail older people, and disease factors, including the needs of those with non-malignant conditions. This model, tested in the UK, could serve as an example for other countries.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enhancing integrated palliative care: what models are appropriate? A cross-case analysis
    Sheila Payne
    Rachael Eastham
    Sean Hughes
    Sandra Varey
    Jeroen Hasselaar
    Nancy Preston
    BMC Palliative Care, 16
  • [2] What matters in learning communities for inclusive education: a cross-case analysis
    Walton, Elizabeth
    Carrington, Suzanne
    Saggers, Beth
    Edwards, Chris
    Kimani, Wacango
    PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATION, 2022, 48 (01) : 134 - 148
  • [3] Multiplying the use of space and what it implies in practice: a cross-case analysis
    Brinkoe, Rikke
    Nielsen, Susanne Balslev
    JOURNAL OF FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 16 (02) : 197 - 216
  • [4] A framework of the institutional policies and practice environments of nurse practitioner primary care models: A cross-case analysis
    Hogan, Tory H.
    Maurer, Nicholas R.
    Stevens, Lena
    Hefner, Jennifer L.
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 47 (04) : 369 - 379
  • [5] Financing networks of care: a cross-case analysis from six countries
    Dintrans, Pablo Villalobos
    Roder-DeWan, Sanam
    Wang, Huihui
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [6] Perceptions towards integrated care through the narrative of practicing social workers and psychologists in PHC: a cross-case analysis
    Ryapolova, Nadezhda
    Galea, Jerome T.
    Greene, Karah Y.
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2023, 31 (01) : 75 - 85
  • [7] Advanced energy retrofit projects: cross-case analysis of integrated system design
    Gultekin-Bicer, Pelin
    Anumba, Chimay J.
    Leicht, Robert M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18 (06) : 453 - 466
  • [8] Implementation of interprofessional team-based care: A cross-case analysis
    Sibbald, Shannon L.
    Ziegler, Bianca R.
    Maskell, Rachelle
    Schouten, Karen
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2021, 35 (05) : 654 - 661
  • [10] Doing Cross-Case Analysis: Online and Off
    Khan, Samia
    Mirzaee, Vanesa
    VanWynsberghe, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2010, 9 (04): : 448 - 448