Measuring the effects of environmental policies on electricity markets risk

被引:5
|
作者
Inzunza, Andres [1 ,2 ]
Munoz, Francisco D. [3 ,6 ]
Moreno, Rodrigo [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Energy Ctr, Plaza Ercilla 847, Santiago 8370450, Chile
[2] MIT, MIT Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Cambridge, MA 01239 USA
[3] Univ Adolfo Ibanez, Fac Ingn & Ciencias, Santiago, Chile
[4] Univ Chile, Dept Elect Engn, Santiago 8370450, Chile
[5] Imperial Coll London, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
[6] Inst Sistemas Complejos Ingn, Santiago, Chile
关键词
CVaR optimization; Renewable portfolio standard; Carbon tax; Electricity generation planning; Power systems economics; PORTFOLIO THEORY; ENERGY-STORAGE; OPTIMIZATION; INVESTMENT; GENERATION; RENEWABLES; STANDARDS; EMISSIONS; AVERSION; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105470
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies how environmental policies, such as renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and carbon taxes, might contribute to reducing risk exposure in the electricity generation sector. We illustrate this effect by first computing long-term market equilibria of the Chilean generation sector for the year 2035 using a risk-averse planning model, considering uncertainty of hydrological scenarios and fossil fuel prices as well as distinct levels of risk aversion, but assuming no environmental policies in place. We then compare these risk-averse equilibria to generation portfolios obtained by imposing several levels of RPS and carbon taxes in a market with risk-neutral firms, separately. Our results show that the implementation of both policies can provide incentives for investments in portfolios of generation technologies that limit the risk exposure of the system, particularly when high levels of RPS (35%) or high carbon taxes (35 $/tonCO2) are applied. However, we find that in the case of a hydrothermal system, the resulting market equilibria under RPS policies yield expected generation cost and risk levels (i.e. standard deviation of costs) that are more similar to the efficient portfolios determined using a risk-averse planning model than the ones we find under the carbon tax.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Modeling and Simulation of Electricity Markets under Different Environmental Policies
    Fu, Xinhua
    Zhao, Chen
    Zhang, Shaohua
    Wang, Xian
    [J]. SYSTEM SIMULATION AND SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, PT II, 2012, 327 : 34 - 43
  • [3] Measuring crisis from climate risk spillovers in European electricity markets
    Zhao, Wanli
    Zhai, Xiangyang
    Ji, Qiang
    Liu, Zhenhua
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 134
  • [4] Quantifying the effects of different support policies for renewables on European electricity markets
    Winkler, Jenny
    Klobasa, Marian
    [J]. 2014 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET (EEM), 2014,
  • [5] Measuring Efficiency in Wholesale Electricity Markets
    Bowden, Nicholas S.
    [J]. Electricity Journal, 2009, 22 (05): : 34 - 38
  • [6] Measuring welfare in restructured electricity markets
    Mansur, Erin T.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2008, 90 (02) : 369 - 386
  • [7] Risk management in electricity markets
    Basterfield, David
    Bundt, Thomas
    Nordt, Kevin
    [J]. MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2010, 36 (06) : 525 - 533
  • [8] Competition and environmental policies in an electricity sector
    Chaton, Corinne
    Guillerminet, Marie-Laure
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 : 215 - 228
  • [9] Measuring Heterogeneous Effects of Environmental Policies Using Panel Data
    Steigerwald, Douglas G.
    Vazquez-Bare, Gonzalo
    Maier, Jason
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2021, 8 (02) : 277 - 313
  • [10] Assessing long-term effects of demand response policies in wholesale electricity markets
    Cepeda, Mauricio
    Saguan, Marcelo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 74 : 142 - 152