Effect of Clinical Decision-Support Systems A Systematic Review

被引:740
|
作者
Bright, Tiffani J.
Wong, Anthony
Dhurjati, Ravi
Bristow, Erin
Bastian, Lori
Coeytaux, Remy R.
Samsa, Gregory
Hasselblad, Vic
Williams, John W.
Musty, Michael D.
Wing, Liz
Kendrick, Amy S.
Sanders, Gillian D.
Lobach, David
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Duke Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL-RECORD; PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY; PROMOTING SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; HEALTH INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; LABORATORY MONITORING ALERTS; PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS; INNER-CITY SETTINGS; QUALITY-OF-CARE; COMPUTERIZED REMINDERS;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite increasing emphasis on the role of clinical decision-support systems (CDSSs) for improving care and reducing costs, evidence to support widespread use is lacking. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of CDSSs on clinical outcomes, health care processes, workload and efficiency, patient satisfaction, cost, and provider use and implementation. Data Sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science through January 2011. Study Selection: Investigators independently screened reports to identify randomized trials published in English of electronic CDSSs that were implemented in clinical settings; used by providers to aid decision making at the point of care; and reported clinical, health care process, workload, relationship-centered, economic, or provider use outcomes. Data Extraction: Investigators extracted data about study design, participant characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and quality. Data Synthesis: 148 randomized, controlled trials were included. A total of 128 (86%) assessed health care process measures, 29 (20%) assessed clinical outcomes, and 22 (15%) measured costs. Both commercially and locally developed CDSSs improved health care process measures related to performing preventive services (n = 25; odds ratio [OR], 1.42 [95% CI, 1.27 to 1.58]), ordering clinical studies (n = 20; OR, 1.72 [CI, 1.47 to 2.00]), and prescribing therapies (n = 46; OR, 1.57 [CI, 1.35 to 1.82]). Few studies measured potential unintended consequences or adverse effects. Limitations: Studies were heterogeneous in interventions, populations, settings, and outcomes. Publication bias and selective reporting cannot be excluded. Conclusion: Both commercially and locally developed CDSSs are effective at improving health care process measures across diverse settings, but evidence for clinical, economic, workload, and efficiency outcomes remains sparse. This review expands knowledge in the field by demonstrating the benefits of CDSSs outside of experienced academic centers.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / U77
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of chemotherapy prescription clinical decision-support systems on the chemotherapy process: A systematic review
    Rahimi, Rezvan
    Moghaddasi, Hamid
    Rafsanjani, Khadijeh Arjmandi
    Bahoush, Gholamreza
    Kazemi, Alireza
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 122 : 20 - 26
  • [2] Tight glycemic control and computerized decision-support systems: a systematic review
    Eslami, Saeid
    Abu-Hanna, Ameen
    de Jonge, Evert
    de Keizer, Nicolette F.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 (09) : 1505 - 1517
  • [3] Tight glycemic control and computerized decision-support systems: a systematic review
    Saeid Eslami
    Ameen Abu-Hanna
    Evert de Jonge
    Nicolette F. de Keizer
    [J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2009, 35 : 1505 - 1517
  • [4] Clinical decision-support systems: Evaluating the evaluation
    Hornberger, J
    Goldstein, MK
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2000, 20 (01) : 130 - 131
  • [5] Mobile Clinical Decision Support Systems - A Systematic Review
    Dwivedi, Rahul
    Ghahramani, Fereshteh
    Mahapatra, RadhaKanta
    [J]. AMCIS 2017 PROCEEDINGS, 2017,
  • [6] THE COMPUTER AND CLINICAL DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS IN PRIMARY CARE
    TAYLOR, TR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1990, 30 (02): : 137 - 140
  • [7] PHILOSOPHIES FOR THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS
    HEATHFIELD, HA
    WYATT, J
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 1993, 32 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [8] A Systematic Review of Clinical Decision Support Systems for Clinical Oncology Practice
    Pawloski, Pamela A.
    Brooks, Gabriel A.
    Nielsen, Matthew E.
    Olson-Bullis, Barbara A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2019, 17 (04): : 331 - 338
  • [9] A SYSTEMATIC R-AND-D AGENDA FOR DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS
    KHOONG, CM
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING '94, VOL III: LINKAGE AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 1994, 53 : 136 - 141
  • [10] Towards effective clinical decision support systems: A systematic review
    Hak, Francini
    Guimaraes, Tiago
    Santos, Manuel
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):