The effect of flow confinement on laminar shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions

被引:16
|
作者
Lusher, David J. [1 ]
Sandham, Neil D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Aerodynam & Flight Mech Grp, Boldrewood Campus, Southampton SO16 7QF, Hants, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
boundary layer separation; compressible boundary layers; shock waves; LOW-FREQUENCY UNSTEADINESS; 3-DIMENSIONAL SEPARATION; WAVE; TRANSITION; FRAMEWORK; TOPOLOGY;
D O I
10.1017/jfm.2020.354
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Numerical work on shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions (SBLI) to date has largely focused on span-periodic quasi-two-dimensional (quasi-2-D) configurations that neglect the influence lateral confinement has on the core flow. The present study is concerned with the effect of flow confinement on Mach 2 laminar SBLI in rectangular ducts. An oblique shock generated by a wedge forms a conical swept SBLI with sidewall boundary layers before reflecting from the bottom wall of the domain. Multiple large regions of flow-reversal are observed on the sidewalls, bottom wall and at the corner intersection. The main interaction is found to be strongly three-dimensional and highly dependent on the geometry of the duct. Comparison to quasi-2-D span-periodic simulations showed sidewalls strengthen the interaction by 31 % for the baseline configuration with an aspect ratio of one. The length of the shock generator and subsequent trailing edge expansion fan position was shown to be a critical parameter in determining the central separation length. By shortening the length of the shock generator, modification of the interaction and suppression of the central interaction is demonstrated. Parametric studies of shock strength and duct aspect ratio were performed to find limiting behaviours. For the largest aspect ratio of four, three-dimensionality was visible across 30 % of the span width away from the wall. The topology of the three-dimensional separation is shown to be similar to 'owl-like' separations of the first kind. Reflection of the initial conical swept SBLI is found to be the most significant factor determining the flow structures downstream of the main interaction.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SHOCK-WAVE BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTIONS IN LAMINAR TRANSONIC FLOW
    BRILLIANT, HM
    ADAMSON, TC
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1974, 12 (03) : 323 - 329
  • [2] PREDICTION OF HYPERSONIC LAMINAR BOUNDARY-LAYER SHOCK-WAVE INTERACTIONS
    HODGE, BK
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1977, 15 (07) : 903 - 904
  • [3] FLOW SEPARATION IN SHOCK-WAVE BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTIONS
    HAMED, A
    KUMAR, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1994, 116 (01): : 98 - 103
  • [4] SHOCK-WAVE LAMINAR BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTION IN SUPERCRITICAL TRANSONIC FLOW
    BODONYI, RJ
    SMITH, FT
    [J]. COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 1986, 14 (02) : 97 - 108
  • [5] Transitional shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions in hypersonic flow
    Sandham, N. D.
    Schuelein, E.
    Wagner, A.
    Willems, S.
    Steelant, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2014, 752 : 349 - 382
  • [6] ADIABATIC LAMINAR BOUNDARY-LAYER/SHOCK-WAVE INTERACTIONS ON FLARED AXISYMMETRIC BODIES
    HORTON, HP
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1971, 9 (11) : 2141 - &
  • [7] Effects of vibrational nonequilibrium on hypersonic shock-wave/laminar boundary-layer interactions
    Hao, Jiaao
    Wen, Chih-Yung
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS IN HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2018, 97 : 136 - 142
  • [8] Convective instabilities in a laminar shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction
    Niessen, Sebastien E. M.
    Groot, Koen J.
    Hickel, Stefan
    Terrapon, Vincent E.
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2023, 35 (02)
  • [9] Incipient Separation in Laminar Ramp-Induced Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions
    Grisham, James R.
    Dennis, Brian H.
    Lu, Frank K.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2018, 56 (02) : 524 - 531
  • [10] INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SHOCK-WAVE AND HYPERSONIC LAMINAR BOUNDARY-LAYER NEAR CONVEX CORNER
    HAWBOLDT, RJ
    SULLIVAN, PA
    GOTTLIEB, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1995, 32 (05) : 783 - 790