Flexible Etherified and Esterified Triphenylethylene Derivatives and Their Evaluation on ER-positive and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cell Lines

被引:1
|
作者
Hassan, Aya S. [1 ]
Wober, Jannette [2 ]
Vollmer, Gunter [2 ]
Abadi, Ashraf H. [1 ]
Ahmed, Nermin S. [1 ]
机构
[1] German Univ Cairo, Fac Pharm & Biotechnol, Dept Pharmaceut Chem, Cairo 11835, Egypt
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Biol, Inst Zool, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
关键词
MCF-7; Ridaifen; SERM; Tamoxifen; YEAST SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; ADJUVANT BREAST; RIDAIFEN-F; TAMOXIFEN; DRUG; DESIGN; ANALOGS; ANGIOGENESIS; ASSOCIATION; ANTAGONISM;
D O I
10.1002/cmdc.202100720
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Tamoxifen (TAM) is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) with potential clinical benefits for all stages of breast cancer. TAM is primarily metabolized to more potent metabolites via polymorphic CYP2D6. This affects the clinical outcome of TAM treatment. Herein we report novel TAM analogues that can avoid metabolism via CYP2D6. The novel analogues bear a flexible skeleton. Compounds have either an ester group on ring C or homodiaminoalkoxy groups on rings B and C. Compound 6 (E/Z-4-[1-[4-(2-diethylaminoethoxy)phenyl]-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-methyl[propenyl]phenol) was found to be ten-fold more potent than TAM on MCF-7 cells (GI(50)=0.15 mu M). It showed fivefold greater inhibitory activity on MDA-MB-231 cells than TAM (GI(50)=1.71 mu M). Compound 13 (4-{3,3-bis-[4-(3-dimethylaminopropoxy)phenyl]-2-methylallyl}methoxybenzene) was the most potent among the homodiaminoalkoxy derivatives (GI(50)=0.44) on both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines, respectively. Furthermore, the COMPARE algorithm suggested that it has different molecular targets from those of some other reported anticancer drugs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vitro evaluation of dioscin and protodioscin against ER-positive and triple-negative breast cancer
    Bouchmaa, Najat
    Ben Mrid, Reda
    Bouargalne, Youssef
    Ajouaoi, Sana
    Cacciola, Francesco
    El Fatimy, Rachid
    Nhiri, Mohamed
    Zyad, Abdelmajid
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):
  • [2] New Treatment Options in ER-Positive, HER2-Positive and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Steger, Guenther
    Bell, Richard
    Cameron, David
    Dent, Rebecca A.
    Jackisch, Christian
    [J]. BREAST CARE, 2013, 8 (02) : 155 - 157
  • [3] Identification of a prognostic LncRNA signature for ER-positive, ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancers
    Liu, Dingxie
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 183 (01) : 95 - 105
  • [4] Identification of a prognostic LncRNA signature for ER-positive, ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancers
    Dingxie Liu
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2020, 183 : 95 - 105
  • [5] Claudin Expression in Triple Negative and ER-Positive Breast Carcinoma
    Malik, M. A.
    Cohen, C.
    Adams, A.
    Wang, J.
    Oprea, G. M.
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 56A - 56A
  • [6] Claudin Expression in Triple Negative and ER-Positive Breast Carcinoma
    Malik, M. A.
    Cohen, C.
    Adams, A.
    Wang, J.
    Oprea, G. M.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 56A - 56A
  • [7] Neoadjuvant Therapy: Current Landscape and Future Horizons for ER-Positive/HER2-Negative and Triple-Negative Early Breast Cancer
    Bischoff, Herve
    Espie, Marc
    Petit, Thierry
    [J]. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024,
  • [8] Finding the positive in triple-negative breast cancer
    Carey, Lisa A.
    [J]. NATURE CANCER, 2021, 2 (05) : 476 - 478
  • [9] Finding the positive in triple-negative breast cancer
    Lisa A. Carey
    [J]. Nature Cancer, 2021, 2 : 476 - 478
  • [10] Met and HGF inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines
    Gaule, Patricia Brid
    Collins, Denis
    Walsh, Naomi
    Duffy, Michael J.
    Crown, John
    O'Donovan, Norma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)