Inter-individual variation in the efficient stimulation site for magnetic brainstem stimulation

被引:12
|
作者
Shirota, Yuichiro [1 ]
Hanajima, Ritsuko
Hamada, Masashi
Terao, Yasuo
Matsumoto, Hideyuki
Tsutsumi, Ryosuke
Ohminami, Shinya
Furubayashi, Toshiaki [2 ,3 ]
Ugawa, Yoshikazu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Div Neurosci,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
[2] Fukushima Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Fukushima, Japan
[3] Tohoku Bunka Gakuen Univ, Fac Med Sci & Welf, Dept Rehabil, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
关键词
Brainstem stimulation; Pyramidal tract; Inter-individual variation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); FORAMEN MAGNUM LEVEL; CORTICOSPINAL TRACT; MOTOR CORTEX; CEREBELLUM; HUMANS; EXCITABILITY; PATHWAYS; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2011.03.025
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To investigate inter-individual variation in the efficiency of magnetic brainstem stimulation (BST) with regard to the stimulation site. Methods: We studied 31 healthy subjects, using a right hand muscle as a recording site. Three stimulation sites were compared: BST over the inion (inion BST), and BST over the midpoint between the inion and the right (ipsilateral BST) or left (contralateral BST) mastoid process. Five suprathreshold BSTs were performed for each stimulation site using the same stimulation intensity. The mean peak-to-peak amplitudes of motor evoked potential (MEP) were compared. The active motor threshold (AMT) and onset latency for inion BST and ipsilateral BST were also measured and compared. Results: Contralateral BST did not evoke discernible MEPs in most subjects. In 21 subjects (67.7%), ipsilateral BST elicited larger MEPs than inion BST did, and AMT for ipsilateral BST was lower than or equal to the AMT for inion BST in all subjects. Ipsilateral BST elicited shorter latency in such subjects. Conclusions: The suitable stimulation site for BST differed among subjects. About two-thirds showed larger MEP to ipsilateral BST. Significance: These findings might help us to find an efficient stimulation site for BST in each subject. (C) 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2044 / 2048
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inter-individual variability in optimal current direction for transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex
    Balslev, Daniela
    Braet, Wouter
    McAllister, Craig
    Miall, R. Chris
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2007, 162 (1-2) : 309 - 313
  • [2] Inter-individual Variability in Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms
    Lopez-Alonso, Virginia
    Cheeran, Binith
    Rio-Rodriguez, Dan
    Fernandez-del-Olmo, Miguel
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2014, 7 (03) : 372 - 380
  • [3] Determinants of Inter-Individual Variability in Corticomotor Excitability Induced by Paired Associative Stimulation
    Minkova, Lora
    Peter, Jessica
    Abdulkadir, Ahmed
    Schumacher, Lena, V
    Kaller, Christoph P.
    Nissen, Christoph
    Kloeppel, Stefan
    Lahr, Jacob
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [5] Inter-individual variation shapes the human microbiome
    Wissel, Emily F.
    Smith, Leigh K.
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2019, 42
  • [6] Inter-individual variation in morphine clearance in children
    Altamimi, Mohammed I.
    Choonara, Imti
    Sammons, Helen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 71 (06) : 649 - 655
  • [7] Inter-individual variation in midazolam clearance in children
    Altamimi, Mohammed I.
    Sammons, Helen
    Choonara, Imti
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2015, 100 (01) : 95 - 100
  • [8] Inter-individual variation shapes the human microbiome
    Wissel, Emily F.
    Smith, Leigh K.
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2019, 42
  • [9] Inter-individual variation in morphine clearance in children
    Mohammed I. Altamimi
    Imti Choonara
    Helen Sammons
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2015, 71 : 649 - 655
  • [10] Inter-individual behavioural variation in the crested porcupine
    Mori, Emiliano
    Ferrari, Caterina
    MAMMALIA, 2021, 85 (03) : 269 - 272