Accuracy of diagnostic tests in multiple sclerosis - a systematic review

被引:26
|
作者
Schaeffler, N. [1 ]
Koepke, S. [2 ]
Winkler, L. [1 ]
Schippling, S. [1 ]
Inglese, M. [3 ]
Fischer, K. [1 ]
Heesen, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Neuroimmunol & Clin MS Res INiMS, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Dept Hlth Sci, Hamburg, Germany
[3] NYU, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
来源
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA | 2011年 / 124卷 / 03期
关键词
multiple sclerosis diagnosis; test accuracy; cerebrospinal fluid; evoked potentials; magnetic resonance imaging; systematic review; CLINICALLY ISOLATED SYNDROMES; PREDICTS FUTURE ATTACKS; 1ST DEMYELINATING EVENT; ISOLATED OPTIC NEURITIS; LONG-TERM DISABILITY; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID; MRI CRITERIA; FOLLOW-UP; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; OLIGOCLONAL BANDS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01454.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been recently proposed and further updates are upcoming. This systematic literature review summarizes diagnostic studies in suspected MS to clarify the value of diagnostic tests. We included studies of at least 40 patients followed up for 2 years. All studies are limited by the fact that no gold standard to validate diagnostic tests is available. A second relapse is used as a surrogate in relapsing-remitting MS, but long follow-up of at least 5 years is necessary to detect all cases. Many studies showed selection bias, partly because of the vague definition of a clinically isolated syndrome. Based on these limitations, sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria was between 35% and 100%, and specificity was between 36% and 92%. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oligoclonal banding showed sensitivities between 69% and 91% with specificities between 59% and 94%. Combination studies of MRI and CSF indicate enhanced sensitivity (56-100%) and specificity (53-96%). Studies on evoked potentials did not justify conclusions about their value. A combination of simplified MRI criteria with CSF might be the best approach for an early MS diagnosis. However, the value of a very early diagnosis stays questionable as patients' benefit of new diagnostic criteria has never been addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 164
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of diagnostic tests for Legionnaires' disease: a systematic review
    Cristovam, Elisabete
    Almeida, Dejanira
    Caldeira, Daniel
    Ferreira, Joaquim J.
    Marques, Teresa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 66 (04) : 485 - 489
  • [2] The accuracy of diagnostic tests for adenoid hypertrophy A systematic review
    Major, Michael P.
    Saltaji, Humam
    El-Hakim, Hamdy
    Witmans, Manisha
    Major, Paul
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 145 (03): : 247 - 254
  • [3] A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of automated tests for cognitive impairment
    Aslam, Rabeea'h W.
    Bates, Vickie
    Dundar, Yenal
    Hounsome, Juliet
    Richardson, Marty
    Krishan, Ashma
    Dickson, Rumona
    Boland, Angela
    Fisher, Joanne
    Robinson, Louise
    Sikdar, Sudip
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 33 (04) : 561 - 575
  • [4] The diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease:: A systematic review
    Rostom, A
    Dubé, C
    Cranney, A
    Saloojee, N
    Sy, R
    Garritty, C
    Sampson, M
    Zhang, L
    Yazdi, F
    Mamaladze, V
    Pan, I
    Macneil, J
    Mack, D
    Patel, D
    Moher, D
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 128 (04) : S38 - S46
  • [5] Diagnostic accuracy of premanipulative vertebrobasilar insufficiency tests: A systematic review
    Hutting, Nathan
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    Vijverman, Veerle
    Keesenberg, Martin D. M.
    Dixon, Gillian
    Scholten-Peeters, Gwendolijne G. M.
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2013, 18 (03) : 177 - 182
  • [6] Accuracy of diagnostic tests for prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review
    Sufian S. Ahmad
    Ahmed Shaker
    Mo Saffarini
    Antonia F. Chen
    Michael T. Hirschmann
    Sandro Kohl
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 3064 - 3074
  • [7] Dynamic tests of ovarian reserve: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy
    Maheshwari, Abha
    Gibreel, Ahmed
    Bhattacharya, Siladitya
    Johnson, N. P.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2009, 18 (05) : 717 - 734
  • [8] Accuracy of diagnostic tests for prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review
    Ahmad, Sufian S.
    Shaker, Ahmed
    Saffarini, Mo
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Hirschmann, Michael T.
    Kohl, Sandro
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (10) : 3064 - 3074
  • [9] The diagnostic accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests for Ebola virus disease: a systematic review
    Dagens, Andrew B.
    Rojek, Amanda
    Sigfrid, Louise
    Pluddemann, Annette
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2023, 29 (02) : 171 - 181
  • [10] Quality assessment in systematic reviews comparing the diagnostic accuracy of multiple tests
    Leeflang, Mariska M. G.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 28 (05) : 629 - 630