Implant-supported fixed and removable prostheses in the fibular mandible

被引:5
|
作者
Nguyen, Truc Thi Hoang [1 ]
Eo, Mi Young [1 ]
Myoung, Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Myung-Joo [2 ]
Kim, Soung Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Res Inst, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Res Inst, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
关键词
Fibula free flap (FFF); Dental implant; Mandibular reconstruction; Implant-supported prosthesis; Marginal bone loss (MBL); FREE-FLAP RECONSTRUCTION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; REHABILITATION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s40729-020-00241-7
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background To restore the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients who underwent jaw resection and reconstruction surgery, dental rehabilitation is an essential procedure and also one of the most challenging for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Even though recent studies have reported the possibility and reliability of dental implant rehabilitation with the fibula free flap (FFF), clinical reports of long-term follow-up cases are scarce. We herein reported seven cases of FFF reconstruction and implant rehabilitation. We also discussed implant planning strategy and surgical techniques. Methods From 2012 to 2019, seven patients were treated with FFF reconstructive jaw surgery combined with dental implant installation and fabrication of implant-supported prostheses at Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea. Patient characteristics and FFF treatment results were collected. Records of dental implants were analyzed clinically and radiologically. Results Among the seven patients in this report, there were three males and four females, with an average age of 54.4 years. A total of 39 implants were placed in the fibular bone. The mean follow-up period after implant installation was 24 months. Five implants failed and were removed 3 months after installation. The implant success rate was 87.2%. Marginal bone loss at 12 months after loading was 0.23 +/- 0.18 mm on the mesial side and 0.25 +/- 0.26 mm on the distal side. Conclusion With the challenges present in FFF-reconstructed patients, an implant-supported prosthesis is a reliable option for stable and functional oral rehabilitation. The implant-supported prosthesis on the FFF has great results regarding restoration of function (mastication, swallowing, and speaking), appearance, and overall HRQoL. Collaboration between surgeons and prosthodontists is essential for a satisfying outcome.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implant-supported fixed and removable prostheses in the fibular mandible
    Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen
    Mi Young Eo
    Hoon Myoung
    Myung-Joo Kim
    Soung Min Kim
    [J]. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 6
  • [2] Stress Analysis of Implant-Supported Removable Partial Denture with Anterior Fixed Prostheses and Conventional Implant-Supported Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible
    Ozel, Gulsum Sayin
    Ozyilmaz, Ozgun Yusuf
    Inan, Ozgur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ORAL RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [3] Comparison of fixed implant-supported prostheses, removable implant-supported prostheses, and complete dentures: patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life
    Oh, Sung-Hee
    Kim, Younhee
    Park, Joo-Yeon
    Jung, Yea Ji
    Kim, Seong-Kyun
    Park, Sun-Young
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (02) : E31 - E37
  • [4] Removable dentures versus implant-supported prostheses in the elderly
    Bortolotti, L.
    [J]. DENTAL CADMOS, 2011, 79 (01) : 18 - 26
  • [5] WITHIN-SUBJECT COMPARISON OF MASTICATION WITH FIXED AND REMOVABLE IMPLANT-SUPPORTED MANDIBULAR PROSTHESES
    LUND, JP
    FEINE, JS
    MASKAWI, K
    DEGRANDMONT, P
    TACHE, R
    TANGUAY, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 233 - 233
  • [6] Implant-supported prostheses versus conventional permanent and removable dentures
    Koszuta, Agnieszka
    Szymanska, Jolanta
    [J]. CURRENT ISSUES IN PHARMACY AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 27 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [7] Digital Impressions for Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses
    Lee S.J.
    Lee J.D.
    [J]. Current Oral Health Reports, 2017, 4 (2) : 136 - 141
  • [8] IMPLANT-SUPPORTED FIXED DISTAL-EXTENSION PROSTHESES
    WATSON, RM
    DAVIS, DM
    ECKHARDT, P
    NEWMAN, P
    ROGERS, JO
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1994, 176 (09) : 351 - 355
  • [9] Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses:: A retrospective study
    Johansson, LÅ
    Ekfeldt, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2003, 16 (02) : 172 - 176
  • [10] Comparison of Treatment Outcomes in Partially Edentulous Patients with Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses and Removable Partial Dentures
    Nogawa, Toshifumi
    Takayama, Yoshiyuki
    Ishida, Keita
    Yokoyama, Atsuro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (06) : 1376 - 1383