Does an intrinsic work value orientation strengthen the impact of job resources? A perspective from the Job Demands-Resources Model

被引:70
|
作者
Van den Broeck, Anja [1 ]
Van Ruysseveldt, Joris [2 ]
Smulders, Peter [3 ]
De Witte, Hans [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Open Univ Netherlands, Fac Psychol, Heerlen, Netherlands
[3] TNO Qual Working Life, Hoofddorp, Netherlands
关键词
Emotional exhaustion; Extrinsic work values; Intrinsic work values; Job demands-resources model; Personal resources; Work engagement; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; GOAL CONTENTS; ENGAGEMENT; BURNOUT; MODERATORS; FIT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; WORKPLACE;
D O I
10.1080/13594321003669053
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Based on assumptions of the Job Demands-Resources model and the Person-Environment fit literature, the present research conceptualizes an intrinsic relative to an extrinsic work value orientation as a personal resource. We examine whether such an orientation may strengthen the relations of classical job resources (i.e., autonomy and learning opportunities) with well-being outcomes. The results in a large, representative sample of Dutch employees (N = 4009) show that a predominant intrinsic work orientation strengthened the negative association of learning opportunities with emotional exhaustion as well as the buffering role of autonomy for the health-impairing impact of workload. With respect to work engagement, a predominant intrinsic work orientation strengthened the positive association of autonomy, the expected boosting impact of workload on the stimulating association of autonomy, as well as the-rather unexpected-attenuating impact of workload on the positive association of learning opportunities with work engagement. Although not all hypotheses were confirmed, in general, results point at the importance and practical relevance of personal resources in the realm of the Job Demands-Resources model.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 609
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does equity mediate the effects of job demands and job resources on work outcomes? An extension of the job demands-resources model
    Hu, Qiao
    Schaufeli, Wilmar B.
    Tanis, Toon W.
    [J]. CAREER DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 18 (04) : 357 - 376
  • [2] Entrepreneurial orientation and the job demands-resources model
    Kattenbach, Ralph
    Fietze, Simon
    [J]. PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2018, 47 (03) : 745 - 764
  • [3] Work orientations in the job demands-resources model
    Demerouti, Evangelia
    Bakker, Arnold B.
    Fried, Yitzhak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 27 (5-6) : 557 - 575
  • [4] Spiritual resources in the job demands-resources model
    Bickerton, Grant
    Miner, Maureen
    Dowson, Martin
    Griffin, Barbara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SPIRITUALITY & RELIGION, 2014, 11 (03) : 245 - 268
  • [5] Workplace bullying: A perspective from the Job Demands-Resources model
    van den Broeck, Anja
    Baillien, Elfi
    De Witte, Hans
    [J]. SA JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 37 (02)
  • [6] The job demands-resources model of burnout
    Demerouti, E
    Bakker, AB
    Nachreiner, F
    Schaufeli, WB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) : 499 - 512
  • [7] APPLICATION OF JOB DEMANDS-RESOURCES MODEL IN RESEARCH ON RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN JOB SATISFACTION, JOB RESOURCES, INDIVIDUAL RESOURCES AND JOB DEMANDS
    Potocka, Adrianna
    Waszkowska, Malgorzata
    [J]. MEDYCYNA PRACY, 2013, 64 (02) : 217 - 225
  • [8] The Job Demands-Resources Model and Job Burnout: The Mediating Role of Personal Resources
    Huang, Jie
    Wang, Yansong
    You, Xuqun
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 35 (04) : 562 - 569
  • [9] When job resources function as a stress buffer: A resource allocation perspective of the job demands-resources model
    Bao, Haixu
    Liu, Cong
    Ma, Jie
    Feng, Jiawei
    He, Huiyuan
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2022, 192
  • [10] The Job Demands-Resources Model and Job Burnout: The Mediating Role of Personal Resources
    Jie Huang
    Yansong Wang
    Xuqun You
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2016, 35 : 562 - 569