Impact of clinical supervision of health professionals on organizational outcomes: a mixed methods systematic review protocol

被引:2
|
作者
Martin, Priya [1 ]
Lizarondo, Lucylynn [2 ]
Kumar, Saravana [3 ]
Snowdon, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Rural Clin Sch, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Joanna Briggs Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Sch Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Peninsula Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Clinical supervision; job satisfaction; organizational outcome; professional supervision; quality of work life; PATIENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00017
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this review is to develop an aggregated synthesis of qualitative and quantitative reviews to derive recommendations for policy and practice relevant to clinical supervision (CS). Introduction: Clinical supervision is a process where supervisors and supervisees engage in guided evaluation and reflection on current practice to enhance future practice. Recent studies have demonstrated the positive impact of CS on patient outcomes; however, the impact of CS on organizational outcomes is less clear. Therefore, this review will investigate organization outcomes and how health practitioners experience and view CS. Inclusion criteria: This review will consider quantitative and qualitative studies on health professional supervisees in nutrition and dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, psychology, podiatry, social work, speech pathology and exercise physiology in hospitals and community settings. The quantitative component will include studies on the effects of CS based on staff retention and recruitment, intent to stay, intent to leave, job satisfaction and quality of work life, burnout and absenteeism. The qualitative component will consider studies that explore health professional supervisees' experiences on CS related to organizational outcomes. Methods: CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, PEDro and Scopus will be searched for studies published in English, without a date limit. Both quantitative and qualitative studies will be screened for inclusion and critically appraised for methodological quality, and both types of data extracted using JBI tools for mixed methods systematic reviews. A convergent segregated approach to synthesis and integration will be used. The findings of each single method synthesis will be configured according to JBI methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 120
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review
    Martin, Priya
    Lizarondo, Lucylynn
    Kumar, Saravana
    Snowdon, David
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):
  • [2] Effective clinical supervision of allied health professionals: a mixed methods study
    David A. Snowdon
    Michelle Sargent
    Cylie M. Williams
    Stephen Maloney
    Kirsten Caspers
    Nicholas F. Taylor
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [3] Effective clinical supervision of allied health professionals: a mixed methods study
    Snowdon, David A.
    Sargent, Michelle
    Williams, Cylie M.
    Maloney, Stephen
    Caspers, Kirsten
    Taylor, Nicholas F.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [4] Clinical supervision frameworks for allied health professionals: a systematic and critical review
    Gardner, Marcus
    McKinstry, Carol
    Perrin, Byron
    [J]. INTERNET JOURNAL OF ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES AND PRACTICE, 2021, 19 (03):
  • [5] Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review
    Hoque, Dewan Md Emdadul
    Kumari, Varuni
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Romero, Lorena
    Evans, Sue M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (04):
  • [6] Outcomes and Impact of Training and Development in Health Management and Leadership in Relation to Competence in Role: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review Protocol
    Ayeleke, Reuben Olugbenga
    North, Nicola
    Wallis, Katharine Ann
    Liang, Zhanming
    Dunham, Annette
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 5 (12): : 715 - 720
  • [7] A systematic review of evidence relating to clinical supervision for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals
    Pollock, Alex
    Campbell, Pauline
    Deery, Ruth
    Fleming, Mick
    Rankin, Jean
    Sloan, Graham
    Cheyne, Helen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (08) : 1825 - 1837
  • [8] Delegation by Allied Health Professionals to Allied Health Assistants: a mixed methods systematic review
    Sarigiovannis, P.
    Jowett, S.
    Saunders, B.
    Corp, N.
    Bishop, A.
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2021, 112 : 16 - 30
  • [9] Clinical supervision of allied health professionals in country South Australia: A mixed methods pilot study
    Kumar, Saravana
    Osborne, Kate
    Lehmann, Tanya
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2015, 23 (05) : 265 - 271
  • [10] Impact of clinical supervision on the mental health nursing workforce: a scoping review protocol
    McDonough, Joshua Henry
    Rhodes, Kate
    Procter, Nicholas
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (03):