Psychological sequelae of medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation

被引:18
|
作者
Ashok, PW [1 ]
Hamoda, H [1 ]
Flett, GMM [1 ]
Kidd, A [1 ]
Fitzmaurice, A [1 ]
Templeton, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen Royal Infirm, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
medical abortion; surgical abortion; psychological sequelae; late first trimester;
D O I
10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00728.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Although not much research comparing the emotional distress following medical and surgical abortion is available, few studies have compared psychological sequelae following both methods of abortion early in the first trimester of pregnancy. The aim of this review was to assess the psychological sequelae and emotional distress following medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation. Methods Partially randomized patient preference trial in a Scottish Teaching Hospital was conducted. The hospital anxiety and depression scales were used to assess emotional distress. Anxiety levels were also assessed using visual analog scales while semantic differential rating scales were used to measure self-esteem. A total of 368 women were randomized, while 77 entered the preference cohort. Results There were no significant differences in hospital anxiety and depression scales scores for anxiety or depression between the groups. Visual analog scales showed higher anxiety levels in women randomized to surgery prior to abortion (P < 0.0001), while women randomized to surgical treatment were less anxious after abortion (P < 0.0001). Semantic differential rating scores showed a fall in self-esteem in the randomized medical group compared to those undergoing surgery (P = 0.02). Conclusions Medical abortion at 10-13 weeks is effective and does not increase psychological morbidity compared to surgical vacuum aspiration and hence should be made available to all women undergoing abortion at these gestations.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 766
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized comparison of medical abortion and surgical vacuum aspiration at 10-13 weeks gestation
    Ashok, PW
    Kidd, A
    Flett, GMM
    Fitzmaurice, A
    Graham, W
    Templeton, A
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (01) : 92 - 98
  • [2] Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation
    Ashok, PW
    Hamoda, H
    Flett, GMM
    Kidd, A
    Fitzmaurice, A
    Templeton, A
    CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 71 (02) : 143 - 148
  • [3] The prevalence of non-viable pregnancy at 10-13 weeks of gestation
    Pandya, PP
    Snijders, RJM
    Psara, N
    Hilbert, L
    Nicolaides, KH
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 7 (03) : 170 - 173
  • [4] COMPARISON OF CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND AMNIOCENTESIS FOR FETAL KARYOTYPING AT 10-13 WEEKS GESTATION
    NICOLAIDES, K
    BRIZOT, MD
    PATEL, F
    SNIJDERS, R
    LANCET, 1994, 344 (8920): : 435 - 439
  • [5] MEDICAL ABORTION AT OR AFTER 13 WEEKS GESTATION PROVIDED THROUGH TELEMEDICINE SERVICES
    Kapp, N.
    Andersen, K.
    Griffin, R.
    Handayani, A.
    Schellekens, M.
    Gomperts, R.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2020, 102 (04) : 284 - 284
  • [6] Surgical abortion prior to 7 weeks of gestation
    Lichtenberg, E. Steve
    Paul, Maureen
    CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 88 (01) : 7 - 17
  • [7] Medical abortion at 9-13 weeks' gestation: a review of 1076 consecutive cases
    Hamoda, H
    Ashok, PW
    Flett, GMM
    Templeton, A
    CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 71 (05) : 327 - 332
  • [8] A prospective comparative study on transabdominal chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis performed at 10-13 weeks' gestation
    Cederholm, M
    Axelsson, O
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1997, 17 (04) : 311 - 317
  • [9] Misoprostol dose and timing before surgical abortion at 13 to 16 weeks' gestation: a randomized trial
    Dean, G.
    Colarossi, L.
    Porsch, L.
    Balakumar, K.
    Dayananda, I.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2017, 96 (04) : 264 - 264
  • [10] Abortion Care Beyond 13 Weeks' Gestation: A Global Perspective
    Cohen, Megan A.
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Edelman, Alison
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 64 (03): : 460 - 474