Open compared with laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:62
|
作者
Athanasiou, C. D. [1 ]
Markides, G. A. [1 ]
Kotb, A. [1 ]
Jia, X. [1 ]
Gonsalves, S. [1 ]
Miskovic, D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Teaching Hosp, John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St James Univ Hosp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Biomed & Clin Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
CME/D3; extended lymphadenectomy techniques; colonic cancer; CENTRAL VASCULAR LIGATION; EXTENDED RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COLORECTAL SURGERY; D3; LYMPHADENECTOMY; OPEN COLECTOMY; TERM-OUTCOMES; RESECTION; MULTICENTER; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/codi.13385
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AimSeveral studies report improved survival in colon cancer with use of extended lymphadenectomy techniques (ELTs), such as D3 lymphadenectomy or complete mesocolic excision. The noninferiority of laparoscopic versus open techniques has already been established in D2 resections. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of open and laparoscopic approaches for ELTs in colon cancer. MethodMajor databases, including PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane library, were searched using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and relevant data were extracted. The Cochrane and Newcastle-Ottawa tools were used for critical appraisal and quality assessment. Meta-analysis with various subgroup analyses were undertaken, and clinical and statistical heterogeneity, along with publication bias, were also assessed. ResultsOne randomized and seven case-control trials were included. All studies were found to be of low methodological quality with some external validity issues. There was no difference in short-term mortality [OR=2.16 (95% CI: 0.73-6.41); P=0.16], anastomotic leakage, ileus or deep-sited infection/abscess. There was a trend for longer operative time [weighted mean difference (WMD)=-30.88 (95% CI: -62.38 to 0.61); P=0.05] and shorter length of hospital stay [WMD=2.29 (95% CI: -0.39 to 4.98); P=0.09] with the laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy had a lower wound-infection rate [OR=2.87 (95% CI: 1.38-5.98); P=0.005] compared with the relevant open group. No statistically significant difference was found in overall survival [hazard ratio (HR)=0.85 (95% CI: 0.69-1.06); P=0.15], disease-free survival, local recurrence and distant metastases. ConclusionBased on the current evidence, the laparoscopic technique appears to be at least as safe as the open technique when used in performing ELTs for colonic cancer, with similar morbidity and oncological outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:O224 / O235
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ionut Negoi
    Sorin Hostiuc
    Ruxandra Irina Negoi
    Mircea Beuran
    [J]. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2017, 9 (12) : 475 - 491
  • [2] Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Negoi, Ionut
    Hostiuc, Sorin
    Negoi, Ruxandra Irina
    Beuran, Mircea
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 9 (12) : 475 - 491
  • [3] Laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision: a systematic review by updated meta-analysis
    Gavriilidis, Paschalis
    Davies, R. Justin
    Biondi, Antonio
    Wheeler, James
    Testini, Mario
    Carcano, Giulio
    Di Saverio, Salomone
    [J]. UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2020, 72 (03) : 639 - 648
  • [4] Laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision: a systematic review by updated meta-analysis
    Paschalis Gavriilidis
    R. Justin Davies
    Antonio Biondi
    James Wheeler
    Mario Testini
    Giulio Carcano
    Salomone Di Saverio
    [J]. Updates in Surgery, 2020, 72 : 639 - 648
  • [5] Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus Noncomplete Mesocolic Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dai, Qiaoqiong
    Tu, Shiliang
    Dong, Quanjin
    Chen, Bingchen
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2021, 31 (01): : 96 - 103
  • [6] Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision versus noncomplete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Xiaochuan
    Lin, Dezheng
    Chen, Wenpei
    Liu, Wei
    Yu, Zhaoliang
    Cai, Zerong
    Hu, Jiancong
    [J]. EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA, 2022, 54 (04): : 189 - 194
  • [7] Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision versus noncomplete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaochuan Chen
    Dezheng Lin
    Wenpei Chen
    Wei Liu
    Zhaoliang Yu
    Zerong Cai
    Jiancong Hu
    [J]. European Surgery, 2022, 54 : 189 - 194
  • [8] Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymphadenectomy versus Conventional Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Diaz-Vico, Tamara
    Fernandez-Hevia, Maria
    Suarez-Sanchez, Aida
    Garcia-Gutierrez, Carmen
    Mihic-Gongora, Luka
    Fernandez-Martinez, Daniel
    alvarez-Perez, Jose Antonio
    Otero-Diez, Jorge Luis
    Granero-Trancon, Jose Electo
    Garcia-Florez, Luis Joaquin
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (13) : 8823 - 8837
  • [9] Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymphadenectomy versus Conventional Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tamara Díaz-Vico
    María Fernández-Hevia
    Aida Suárez-Sánchez
    Carmen García-Gutiérrez
    Luka Mihic-Góngora
    Daniel Fernández-Martínez
    José Antonio Álvarez-Pérez
    Jorge Luis Otero-Díez
    José Electo Granero-Trancón
    Luis Joaquín García-Flórez
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 8823 - 8837
  • [10] Complete mesocolic excision versus conventional surgery for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Crane, Jasmine
    Hamed, Mazin
    Borucki, Joseph P.
    El-Hadi, Ahmed
    Shaikh, Irshad
    Stearns, Adam T.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (07) : 1670 - 1686